Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Directing NGF's actions: it's a Rap

Epidermal growth factor and nerve growth factor (NGF) lead to significantly different temporal patterns of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase activation, and differential regulation of Ras and Rap1 have been implicated in mediating this temporal specificity. Now Sasagawa et al. derive a computational model that incorporates the known signalling interactions and identifies key points of regulation that control these processes.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: EGF and NGF lead to different kinetics of ERK activation.
Figure 2: The computational model takes into account many protein interactions, some of which are shown here.

References

  1. Vaudry, D., Stork, P. J., Lazarovici, P. & Eiden, L. E. Science 296, 1648–1649 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chao, M. V. Cell 68, 995–997 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall, C. J. Cell 80, 179–185 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Traverse, S., Gomez, N., Paterson, H., Marshall, C. & Cohen, P. Biochem. J. 288 (Pt 2), 351–355 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brightman, F. A. & Fell, D. A. FEBS Lett. 482, 169–174 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. York, R. D. et al. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 8069–8083 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kao, S., Jaiswal, R. K., Kolch, W. & Landreth, G. E. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18169–18177 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasagawa, S., Ozaki, Y., Fujita, K. & Kuroda, S. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 365–373 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoeberl, B., Eichler-Jonsson, C., Gilles, E. D. & Muller, G. Nature Biotechnol. 20, 370–375 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbalan-Garcia, S., Yang, S. -S., Degenhardt, K. R. & Bar-Sagi, D. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 5674–5682 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meakin, S. O., MacDonald, J. I., Gryz, E. A., Kubu, C. J. & Verdi, J. M. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9861–9870 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ichiba, T. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14376–14381 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jordan, J. D. et al. J. Biol. Chem. (2005).

  14. Wu, C., Lai, C. F. & Mobley, W. C. J. Neurosci. 21, 5406–5416 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohba, Y., Kurokawa, K. & Matsuda, M. EMBO J. 22, 859–869 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stork, P. Directing NGF's actions: it's a Rap. Nat Cell Biol 7, 338–339 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0405-338

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0405-338

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing