Perspective | Published:

Apomixis technology development—virgin births in farmers' fields?


Apomixis is the process of asexual reproduction through seed, in the absence of meiosis and fertilization, generating clonal progeny of maternal origin. Major benefits to agriculture could result from harnessing apomixis in crop plants. Although >400 apomictic plant species are known, apomixis is rare among crop plants, and the transfer of apomixis to crop varieties by conventional breeding has been largely unsuccessful. Because apomictic and sexual pathways are closely related, de novo engineering of apomixis might be achieved in sexually reproducing crops. Early consideration of issues relating to biosafety and intellectual property (IP) management can facilitate the acceptance and deployment of apomixis technology in agriculture.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Jaenisch, R. & Wilmut, I. Developmental biology. Don't clone humans! Science 291, 2552 (2001).

  2. 2

    Jefferson, R. Apomixis: a social revolution for agriculture? Biotechnol. Dev. Monitor 19, 14–16 (1994).

  3. 3

    Grossniklaus, U. From sexuality to apomixis: molecular and genetic approaches, in The Flowering of Apomixis: from Mechanisms to Genetic Engineering. (eds. Savidan, Y., Carman, J. & Dresselhaus, T.) 168–211 (CIMMYT, IRD, European Commission DG VI, Mexico, D.F., 2001).

  4. 4

    McMeniman, S. & Lubulwa, G. Project Development Assessment: An Economic Evaluation of the Potential Benefits of Integrating Apomixis into Hybrid Rice. Working papers, WP28, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR, Canberra, 1997).

  5. 5

    Redenbaugh, K. Synseeds: Applications of Synthetic Seeds to Crop Improvement. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993).

  6. 6

    Manganaris, G.A., Economou, A.S., Boubourakas, I.N. & Katis, N.A. Elimination of PPV and PNRSV through thermotherapy and meristem-tip culture in nectarine. Plant Cell Rep. 22, 195–200 (2003).

  7. 7

    Koltunow, A. & Grossniklaus, U. Apomixis: A developmental perspective. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 54, 547–574 (2003).

  8. 8

    Rose-Fricker, C.A., Fraser, M.L., Meyer, W.A. & Funk, C.R. Registration of 'Blackstone' Kentucky Bluegrass. Crop Sci. 42, 307–308 (2002).

  9. 9

    Reik, W. & Walter, J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 21–32 (2001).

  10. 10

    Spillane, C., Steimer, A. & Grossniklaus, U. Apomixis in agriculture: the quest for clonal seed. Sexual Plant Reproduction 14, 179–187 (2001).

  11. 11

    Baroux, C., Spillane, C. & Grossniklaus, U. Genomic imprinting during seed development. Adv. Genet. 46, 165–214 (2002).

  12. 12

    Alleman, M. & Doctor, J. Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications. Plant Mol. Biol. 43, 147–161 (2000).

  13. 13

    Quarin, C., Espinoza, F., Martinez, E., Pessino, S. & Bovo, O. A rise in ploidy level induces the expression of apomixis in Paspalum notatum. Sexual Plant Reproduction 13, 243–249 (2001).

  14. 14

    Mittelsten Scheid, O., Jakovleva, L., Afsar, K., Maluszynska, J. & Paszkowski, J. A change of ploidy can modify epigenetic silencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7114–7119 (1996).

  15. 15

    Daniell, H. Genetically modified food crops: current concerns and solutions for next generation crops. Biotechnol. Genetic Eng. Rev. 17, 327–352 (2000)

  16. 16

    Daniell, H. Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 581–586 (2002).

  17. 17

    van Dijk, P. & van Damme, J. Apomixis technology and the paradox of sex. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 81–84 (2000).

  18. 18

    Hurst, L. & Peck, J. Recent advances in understanding the evolution and maintenance of sex. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 46–52 (1996).

  19. 19

    Kondrashov, A.S. Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. J. Hered. 84, 372–387 (1993).

  20. 20

    Berthaud, J. Apomixis and the management of genetic diversity. in The Flowering of Apomixis: from Mechanisms to Genetic Engineering. (eds. Savidan, Y., Carman, J. & Dresselhaus, T.) 8–23 (CIMMYT, IRD, European Commission, Mexico, DF, 2001).

  21. 21

    Kondrashov, A.S. Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. II. Facultative apomixis and selfing. Genetics 111, 635–653 (1985).

  22. 22

    Dale, P., Clarke, B. & Fontes, E. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 567–574 (2002).

  23. 23

    Bierzychudek, P. Patterns in plant parthenogenesis. Experientia 41, 1255–1264 (1985).

  24. 24

    Chapman, H.M., Parh, D. & Oraguzie, N. Genetic structure and colonizing success of a clonal, weedy species, Pilosella officinarum (Asteraceae). Heredity 84, 401–409 (2000)

  25. 25

    Ellstrand, N.C. & Schierenbeck, K.A. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7043–7050 (2000).

  26. 26

    GRAIN Apomixis: the plant breeder's dream. Seedling 18 (2001).

  27. 27

    Holsinger, K.E. Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7037–7042 (2000).

  28. 28

    Wood, D. Ecological principles in agricultural policy: but which principles? Food Policy 23, 371–381 (1998).

  29. 29

    Smale, M. The Green Revolution and wheat genetic diversity: Some unfounded assumptions. World Development 25, 1257–1269 (1997).

  30. 30

    Spillane, C. Agricultural biotechnology and developing countries: proprietary knowledge and diffusion of benefits, in Biotechnology, Agriculture and Diffusion of Benefits. (ed. T. Swanson) 67–136 (Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, 2002).

  31. 31

    Spielman, M., Vinkenoog, R. & Scott, R.J. Genetic mechanisms of apomixis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 358, 1095–1103 (2003).

  32. 32

    Grossniklaus, U., Nogler, G.A. & van Dijk, P.J. How to avoid sex: the genetic control of gametophytic apomixis. Plant Cell 13, 1491–1498 (2001).

Download references

Author information

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence to Ueli Grossniklaus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Figure 1: Schematic of sexual and apomictic developmental pathways.

Bob Crimi

Figure 2: Seed abortion as a result of interploidy crosses.