Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Molecular evolution of antibody cross-reactivity for two subtypes of type A botulinum neurotoxin

Abstract

Broadening antibody specificity without compromising affinity should facilitate detection and neutralization of toxin and viral subtypes. We used yeast display and a co-selection strategy to increase cross-reactivity of a single chain (sc) Fv antibody to botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A). Starting with a scFv that binds the BoNT/A1 subtype with high affinity (136 pM) and the BoNT/A2 subtype with low affinity (109 nM), we increased its affinity for BoNT/A2 1,250-fold, to 87 pM, while maintaining high-affinity binding to BoNT/A1 (115 pM). To find the molecular basis for improved cross-reactivity, we determined the X-ray co-crystal structures of wild-type and cross-reactive antibodies complexed to BoNT/A1 at resolutions up to 2.6 Å, and measured the thermodynamic contribution of BoNT/A1 and A2 amino acids to wild-type and cross-reactive antibody binding. The results show how an antibody can be engineered to bind two different antigens despite structural differences in the antigen-antibody interface and may provide a general strategy for tuning antibody specificity and cross-reactivity.

Main

Botulism is caused by botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) and is characterized by flaccid paralysis, which if not immediately fatal requires prolonged hospitalization in an intensive care unit. Naturally occurring botulism results from ingestion of contaminated food, anaerobic wound infections or gastrointestinal tract colonization by clostridial bacteria1. BoNTs are also classified by the Centers for Disease Control as one of the six highest-risk threat agents for bioterrorism (the 'Category A agents'), owing to their extreme potency and lethality2,3,4.

Treatment of botulism in adults requires use of antitoxin5 generated from immunized horses, which is associated with a high incidence of side effects, including serum sickness and anaphylactic shock6. As an alternative, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are under development7,8. Development of a mAb-based antitoxin for botulism is complicated by two factors. First, single mAbs, regardless of affinity, have not neutralized toxin with a potency that would allow practical development; however combinations of two to three mAbs neutralize BoNT with high potency8. Second, there exist multiple subtypes for each of the seven toxin serotypes, which differ from each other by up to 35% at the amino acid level. These subtype sequence differences affect mAb binding and neutralization9. For example, the amino acid sequences of BoNT subtype A2 (BoNT/A2 (ref. 10)) and BoNT subtype A1 (BoNT/A1 (ref. 11)) differ by 10% (ref. 9). As a result, only three of six mAbs bind both toxin subtypes with high affinity9. The humanized affinity-matured mAb AR2 binds BoNT/A1 with very high affinity (KD = 6.8 × 10−12 M) and exhibits the highest level of in vivo neutralization we have observed for a single mAb12. Unfortunately, AR2 IgG binds BoNT/A2 with more than a 29,000-fold lower affinity than BoNT/A1, and as a result has minimal neutralizing activity for BoNT/A2 (ref. 9).

To overcome these challenges, we used yeast display, antibody gene diversity libraries, and a dual-selection strategy to increase antibody affinity for BoNT/A2 more than 1,000-fold while maintaining high affinity binding to BoNT/A1. Measurement of the thermodynamics of antibody binding to BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 and solution of the X-ray co-crystal structure of antibodies complexed to toxin reveal the basis for increased cross-reactivity and suggest a general route to broadening antibody specificity.

Results

Improving the cross-reactivity of AR2 for BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2

A gene diversity library was used to increase the affinity of the previously created AR2 scFv12 for BoNT/A2 while maintaining high-affinity binding to BoNT/A1. An AR2 scFv–based yeast display library was generated by using a spiked oligonucleotide to introduce mutations into the heavy-chain variable region (VH) antigen-binding loop H1 (Table 1)13,14. Loop amino acids were selected for mutagenesis based on solvent accessibility as determined by modeling. In H1, the loop residues begin in the framework region (as classified by Kabat13) and extend into complementarity determining region 1 (CDR1).

Table 1 Sequences, affinity and binding kinetics of wild-type and cross-reactive antibodies to BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2

For selection of a cross-reactive scFv, the induced library was initially flow sorted after staining with BoNT/A1. The next four rounds of sorting were done with decreasing concentrations of BoNT/A2. After five rounds of sorting, the gene encoding the ScFv was amplified from individual colonies, revealing the presence of one unique sequence, CR1 (Table 1). Compared to AR2, CR1 had three amino acid substitutions in H1 and a single amino acid substitution in H2 (P61S) (Table 1). The affinity of yeast-displayed CR1 scFv for BoNT/A1 was essentially unchanged compared to AR2 (1.36 × 10−10 M versus 1.25 × 10−10 M, respectively), whereas its affinity for BoNT/A2 increased 272-fold, from 1.09 × 10−7 M to 4.0 × 10−10 M (Table 1). Mutation of the P61S mutation in the H2 of CR1 back to P61 resulted in no change in affinity for BoNT/A1 and a less than two-fold reduction in affinity for BoNT/A2, indicating that the increase in cross-reactivity was due almost exclusively to the H1 mutations.

Evolution of CR1 to increase cross-reactivity for BoNT/A1 and A2

To further improve the affinity of the CR1 scFv for BoNT/A2 while maintaining high-affinity binding to BoNT/A1, we generated three additional yeast display libraries based on the sequence of CR1. These libraries were generated by using spiked oligonucleotides to introduce mutations into the H2, H3 or L1 antigen-binding loops (Table 1). For selection of cross-reactive scFv, the induced libraries were stained with BoNT/A1 for the first and fourth rounds of sorting and stained with BoNT/A2 for the second and third rounds of sorting. For subsequent sorting rounds, yeast were simultaneously incubated with BoNT/A2 holotoxin and the receptor binding domain (HC) of BoNT/A1 using a labeling strategy that provided independent sortable signals for BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 binding (Fig. 1). To select yeast displaying scFv with the highest-affinity binding to both BoNT/A subtypes, yeast with the highest mean fluorescence intensity for binding to BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 were separately gated and only yeast present in both gates sorted by intersecting the two gates (Fig. 1c).

Figure 1: Use of flow cytometry to select for yeast-displayed scFv binding both BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2.
figure 1

Representative dot plots showing the method for selection of cross-reactive yeast-displayed scFv. (a,b) For the first through fourth rounds of sorting (second and third rounds shown here), yeast were stained with decreasing concentrations of either BoNT/A1 or BoNT/A2 (labeled as described in the text to generate fluorescence in the APC channel) and SV5-488 (FITC channel) to quantify the scFv display level. Yeast with the highest mean fluorescence intensity for BoNT/A binding were gated and sorted (gate P2). APC, allophycocyanin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate. (c) For the fifth and later rounds of sorting, yeast were labeled with BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 toxins in a manner permitting independent quantification of the extent of BoNT/A1 binding (PE channel) and BoNT/A2 binding (APC channel). Yeast with the highest mean fluorescence intensity for BoNT/A1 binding (gate P3) and BoNT/A2 binding (gate P2) were gated, the gates intersected and only yeast in both gates sorted. PE, phycoerythrin.

After six rounds of sorting, the gene encoding the scFv was amplified from individual colonies for each of the three libraries. Overall, it proved difficult to further increase the affinity of CR1 for BoNT/A2 while maintaining high-affinity binding to BoNT/A1. The only scFv identified with higher affinity for BoNT/A2 and no reduction in affinity for BoNT/A1 had wild-type CDRs and mutations in the framework regions, owing to PCR errors. CR1.1 had a single mutation located outside of H2, V37I, and an 50% improvement in affinity for BoNT/A1 and a fourfold increase in affinity for BoNT/A2 (Table 1). CR1.2 had a single substitution VH E6Q that resulted in an 50% improvement in affinity for BoNT/A1 and a twofold increase in affinity for BoNT/A2. The VH V37I mutation of clone CR1.1 was combined with the VH E6Q mutation of clone CR1.2 to yield the double mutant CR2, which had a 4.5-fold increase in affinity for BoNT/A2 and no change in affinity for BoNT/A1 (Table 1).

Using the co-crystal structure of CR1-BoNT/A1 (see below), nine mutants of CR1 were also generated to either increase hydrogen bonding or van der Waals interaction at the periphery of the interface, increase surface complementarity at the center of the interface or increase hydrophobic interactions. None of these mutations increased cross-reactivity, and most decreased affinity for BoNT/A2 (Supplementary Table 1 online). These results illustrate the challenge in increasing antibody cross-reactivity, even with a co-crystal structure, and highlight the combined power of the diversity library and selection approaches used here.

Overall, the evolution of AR2 to CR2 resulted in a scFv that had the same affinity for BoNT/A1 but whose affinity for BoNT/A2 increased 1,250-fold, from 1.09 × 10−7 to 8.7 × 10−11 M. This narrowed the relative affinities for BoNT/A2:BoNT/A1 from 800-fold for AR2 to no difference for CR2. The six mutations in AR2 accounting for this increase in cross-reactivity are all located in the VH domain, with three mutations in solvent-accessible residues of the VH H1.

Affinities of IgG constructed from scFv

To determine whether changes in affinity observed for the scFvs were recapitulated in the IgGs, we converted CR1 and CR2 scFv to IgG. As with the scFv, CR1 and CR2 IgG showed substantially increased affinity for BoNT/A2 compared to the parental AR2 (116-fold and 693-fold, respectively, for IgG compared to 272-fold and 1,252-fold, respectively, for the scFv), while maintaining high-affinity binding to BoNT/A1 (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1 online). As the KDs of both AR2 and CR2 IgG for BoNT/A1 were 10- to 20-fold higher than the scFv KDs, but the IgG and scFv KDs for BoNT/A2 were comparable, the relative IgG affinity for BoNT/A1 versus BoNT/A2 decreased from 29,000-fold to 29-fold (a 1,000-fold narrowing of relative affinities) compared to 801-fold to 0.76-fold for the scFv (a 1,054-fold narrowing of relative affinities). Thus, although the absolute differences in relative KD were different between the IgG and scFv format, the relative increase in affinity for BoNT/A2 versus BoNT/A1 was translatable from the scFv format to the IgG. The differences in absolute KD between scFv and IgG may reflect differences in scFv stability compared to IgG (usually higher for IgG), the fact that scFvs were displayed on yeast and the IgG were in solution, or differences in techniques used to measure the KD. The difference does not appear to be due to valency, as the KDs of CR1 Fab and IgG for BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 are comparable when measured by the same technique (CR1 Fab KD = 5.0 × 10−12 M and 2.0 × 10−9 M for BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2, respectively).

Structural and functional epitope of AR2 and CR1

To understand the molecular basis of engineered cross-reactivity, we crystallized BoNT/A1 holotoxin in complex with the CR1 and AR2 Fabs. Both Fabs bind to identical regions on the BoNT/A1 binding domain, at the interface between the N-terminal lectin subdomain (HCN) and the C-terminal trefoil subdomain (HCC) (Fig. 2). The BoNT/A1-CR1 structure has a discontinuous epitope that is predominantly composed of the β23-β24, β25-β26, β27-β28 and β35-β36 loops of the lectin subdomain, but also includes the C terminus of the trefoil (Fig. 2a,b and Table 2). The buried interface surface area of CR1 is 1,126 Å2, with nearly an equal contribution being made by the CR1 heavy (588 Å2) and light (538 Å2) chains. Compared with the structure of the uncomplexed BoNT/A1, the trefoil subdomain is displaced 7.5 Å after antibody binding, and several BoNT loops are repositioned to enable optimal binding to CR1 residues.

Figure 2: Overview and specific interactions of the CR1-BoNT/A1 co-crystal.
figure 2

(a) Overall view of BoNT/A1 (yellow) in complex with the CR1 Fab with its light and heavy chains in magenta and green, respectively. (b) Overview of the CR1-BoNT/A1 interface, with the antigen contacting loops (H1, H2, H3, L1, L2 and L3) and toxin β-strands indicated. (c) Detailed view of contacts between CR1 Fab and BoNT/A1. A cartoon representation of BoNT/A1 is shown with carbons (yellow), nitrogens (blue) and oxygens (red). Amino acid contacts are indicated by magenta (VL), green (VH) and black (BoNT/A) numbering. VL, variable light chain; VH, variable heavy chain.

Table 2 Direct contacts between CR1 Fab and BoNT/A1 and the energetics of AR2 and CR1 binding to BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2

Interactions of the CR1 light chain with BoNT/A1 are found in all three of the antigen-binding loops (L1–L3), but are primarily restricted to L1 and L3. L1 binds the β35-β36 loop of BoNT/A1; key interactions include strong hydrogen bonding between Y32 of CR1 and the side chains of D1062 and R1065 of BoNT/A1 and pi-stacking interactions of F36 of CR1 with H1064. L3 binds via G95 and N96 also forms a hydrogen bond with H1064 of BoNT/A1, whereas E97 interacts with S955 in the β27-β28 loop of BoNT/A1. Only a single contact is found in L2 with the C terminus of the trefoil domain via S71 of CR1 with R1294 of BoNT/A1 (Fig. 2b,c and Table 2).

Interactions of the CR1 heavy chain with BoNT/A1 are also found in all three loops (H1–H3). The H1 of CR1 has a variety of side-chain and main-chain interactions, with Y31 and Y33 forming hydrogen bonds to S902 and N918 of BoNT/A1 (Fig. 2b,c and Table 2). The dominant contribution of the CR1 heavy chain in BoNT/A1 binding is from CDR H2 of CR1. In H2, the D53 side-chain hydrogen bonds with the amide nitrogens of E920 and S921 of the β25-β26 loop of BoNT/A1, whereas the E920 side chain interacts with S52 and S56 of CR1. The H2 also interacts with the β27-β28 loop of BoNT/A1 with hydrogen bonds between T58 and Y57 of CR1 with K1056, D1058, G1059 and R1061 of BoNT/A1 (Fig. 2b,c and Table 2). In addition, the H3 of CR1 contributes to the binding with a hydrogen bond between D102 of CR1 with the H1064 of BoNT/A1 and van der Waals contacts between Y101 of CR1 with F917, L919 and T1063 of BoNT/A1.

To determine the functional epitopes of AR2 and CR1, BoNT/A1 HC was displayed on the surface of yeast. A 'BoNT/A2' HC was also displayed on yeast by mutating all seven BoNT/A1 amino acids in the structural epitope, as well as three nearby residues, K903, Q915 and K923, to the BoNT/A2 residue. The affinity of AR2 and CR1 Fab for yeast-displayed BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 HC was comparable to the solution KD of their respective IgG for BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 (CR1 Fab KD = 43 pM and 2.5 nM for BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 yeast displayed; 2.5 pM and 1.73 nM for IgG in solution: AR2 Fab KD = 73 pM and 100 nM for BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 yeast displayed; 6.8 pM and 201 nM for IgG in solution). Each amino acid side chain in the structural epitope of BoNT/A1 or BoNT/A2 was truncated by mutation to alanine, the KD of the yeast-displayed alanine mutant measured for CR1 and AR2 Fab, and the values used to determine the ΔΔG.

The functional epitopes of AR2 and CR1 for BoNT/A1 were virtually identical (Table 2) and were smaller than the structural epitope, with only seven toxin side chains having energetically important interactions with the antibodies (N918, L919, E920, F953, D1062, T1063 and H1064). The most energetically important interaction is with H1064; truncation of the H1064 side chain to alanine reduces affinity of AR2 and CR1 for BoNT/A1 by more than 200,000-fold (Table 2).

Structural and functional basis of antibody cross-reactivity

The identification of the BoNT/A epitope provides a means to understand the basis of engineered antibody cross-reactivity. BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 differ by seven amino acids in the structural epitope (Fig. 3a,b and Table 2). Only two of these amino acids, T1063 and H1064 in the β35-β36, have an energetically important role in antibody binding to BoNT/A1 (Figs. 3, 4 and Table 2). In the BoNT/A2 subtype, these residues are mutated to proline and arginine, respectively. A remarkable feature regarding CR1 cross-reactivity is that residue H1064 is deeply buried in the interface of the CR1 L3 and H3, forming intimate interactions with L1, L3 and H3 CDRs of CR1 (Fig. 3b (iii). Truncation of the H1064 side chain to alanine reduces the binding affinity of AR2 and CR1 for BoNT/A1 more than 200,000-fold to >10 μM. Modeling analysis, however, indicates that the H1064R mutation in BoNT/A2 would not perturb the interactions seen in the BoNT/A1 CR1 complex, as the arginine could also pi-stack with F36 and interact with D102 of H3 of CR1 (Fig. 3b (iv). This is supported by the fact that inserting the mutation H1064R into the BoNT/A1 HC reduces its affinity for AR2 and CR1 only 41- and 188-fold, respectively, whereas inserting the mutation H1064A reduces its affinity for AR2 and CR1 >1,000 and >200,000 fold, respectively. Thus, although the toxin has an amino acid substitution in the most energetically important residue in the center of the combining site, the difference can be accommodated without entirely losing antibody binding.

Figure 3: Location of interactions that differ between CR1 and BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 and affect differential BoNT/A binding.
figure 3

(a) Location of CR1-BoNT/A1 contact residues and residues differing between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2. The alignment of BoNT/A1 and A2 subtypes shows strict sequence conservation in white letters on red background, and strong sequence conservation in red letters. The residues composing the CR1 epitope of the HCN lectin (residues 874–1094) and HCC trefoil (residues 1095–1295) subdomains are indicated with red triangles, energetically important residues are shown with black triangles. Disulfide bonds are indicated using green numbers. The secondary structure elements of the BoNT/A1 binding domain structure are labeled α (α-helix), β (β-strand) and TT (turn). (b) Structural location of differences between BoNT/A1 and A2 and impact on CR1 interactions. (i,ii) Surface representations of BoNT/A1 (yellow) in complex with CR1 (VL in magenta and VH in green) showing patches of sequence variability between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 subtypes in slate blue. (iii,iv) Close-up view of sequence variability between T1063 and H0164 of BoNT/A1 (yellow, iii) and modeled P1063 and R0164 of BoNT/A2 (cyan, iv) in complex with CR1 (VL in magenta and VH in green). (v,vi) Surface representations of BoNT/A1 (yellow) with BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 sequence differences in slate blue. Key differences between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 that are functionally important for binding (high ΔΔG values) are shown in dark blue (1063 and 1064). Functionally important BoNT/A residues (high ΔΔG values) that do not differ between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 are shown in red. Panel v shows CR1 with its light and heavy chains in magenta and green, respectively, with its H1 loop in tan. Panel vi is looking down onto the CR1 epitope of BoNT/A1 with CR1 removed. (c) Details of the interaction between AR2 and CR1 and BoNT/A1 and A2 at the H1 loop. Close-up view of the H1 loop showing sequence and structural differences between BoNT/A1 (yellow) and BoNT/A2 (cyan), in complex with the CR1 (green) and AR2 (orange) Fabs. The BoNT/A2-CR1 and BoNT/A2-AR2 structures are modeled.

Figure 4: Energetics of binding of BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 to AR2 and CR1.
figure 4

The energetic contribution to binding of each BoNT/A1 or BoNT/A2 amino acid side chain in or near the structural epitope to AR2 and CR1 was determined as described in the text and as shown in Table 2. The calculated ΔΔG are color coded from red to blue as shown. Amino acids contributing the greatest energy to binding are red, those with no effect are white and those whose truncation to alanine increases binding affinity are blue.

The engineered increase in affinity of CR1 for BoNT/A2 must result from the amino acid differences between the AR2 and CR1 H1 loops: S30K, D31Y and H32D (Fig. 3c). In this region, it must be possible to change the amino acid side chains of AR2 without losing binding affinity for BoNT/A1 in a way that picks up new binding energy for BoNT/A2. The H1 mutations interact with toxin residues that differ between BoNT/A1 and A2, S902D and K903R. A single interaction is observed in this region between Y31 of the CR1 H1 and S902 of BoNT/A1. The structure of AR2-BoNT/A1 reveals that the D31 of AR2 does not form this hydrogen bond with S902 of BoNT/A1. For either CR1 or AR2, this interaction does not contribute to the energetics of binding (Fig. 4 and Table 2). As a result, it is possible to mutate these residues in AR2 without losing binding affinity for BoNT/A1. In BoNT/A2, the hydrogen bond between CR1 Y31 and D902 of BoNT/A2 is maintained, although this interaction still does not appear to be energetically important (Fig. 4 and Table 2). In the BoNT/A2-AR2 complex, however, D31 of AR2 would likely electrostatically clash with D902 of BoNT/A2 (Fig. 3c), contributing to a reduction in affinity for BoNT/A2. This is supported by the fact that the mutation D902A increases the affinity of AR2 for BoNT/A2 HC (Table 2, negative ΔΔG of 0.49). In addition, in the CR1-BoNT/A2 interaction, an energetically important interaction appears between CR1 H1 and BoNT/A2 R903 that does not exist for AR2-BoNT/A2 (Fig. 4 and Table 2, ΔΔG = +1.01 for CR1 and R903A versus ΔΔG = −0.02 for AR2 and R903A). The structural basis for this interaction obtained from our modeling suggests that R903 of BoNT/A2 could form a salt bridge with D53 of CR1, as well as forming additional hydrogen bonding interactions with S921 of BoNT/A2 (Fig. 3c). The D31 of AR2 and D902 of BoNT/A2, however, would likely prevent this interaction in the AR2-BoNT/A2 complex as they are precariously close to the aliphatic end of R903 of BoNT/A2. This unfavorable interaction would be expected to result in an alternate conformation of R903. To summarize, AR2 H1 residues can be mutated without loss of affinity for BoNT/A1 as they do not make energetically important contacts with BoNT/A1. In CR1, mutation of these residues eliminates an electrostatics clash between AR2 and BoNT/A2 and generates a new energetic interaction with R903.

Discussion

The affinity of CR2 scFv for BoNT/A2 was increased 1,250-fold while maintaining high affinity binding for wild-type BoNT/A1. The increase in cross-reactivity of CR2 equals the largest increases in affinity reported for protein-binding antibodies of a single specificity using any technique15,16. The range over which the increase in affinity for BoNT/A2 occurs (109 nM–87 pM) improves the affinity from a clinically useless value to one that would be considered high affinity for a therapeutic antibody. Only mutations in H1 and in the framework region led to considerable increases in cross-reactivity, even though mutations were introduced into four primary antigen-binding loops (H1, H2, H3 and L1). Although the increase in cross-reactivity was achieved without a crystal structure, the combination of functional studies with the co-crystal structure of CR1-BoNT/A1 and AR2-BoNT/A1 illustrates the basis for increasing cross-reactivity. Antibody amino acids tolerating mutations played no energetic role in binding to wild-type BoNT/A1; mutating these antibody amino acids led to no loss of binding to wild-type BoNT/A1, eliminated energetically unfavorable interactions with BoNT/A2, and established new energetically favorable interactions with BoNT/A2. This can occur only in interface areas where there are differences in antigen sequence yet no energetically important interactions between antibody and wild-type antigen. This situation may be present only in a focal region of contact between antibody and antigen and may explain why mutating amino acids in other loops, or using structure-guided mutagenesis, did not increase cross-reactivity. The mechanism for enhanced cross-reactivity described here is also different, and perhaps more specific than polyreactivity owing to conformational diversity of the antibody-combining site17 or multiple binding modes18.

Introducing mutations specifically into antigen-binding loops, as done here, has theoretical advantages over random mutagenesis. First, it allows a thorough, controlled and systematic diversification of the antibody toxin interface and permits more straightforward combination of mutations to achieve additivity15,16. Second, mutations are introduced into one of the regions of the antibody (CDRs) where mutations are naturally introduced19,20. Whereas somatic mutation also introduces mutations into the framework regions, the location of mutations is not random21. Random mutation may generate substitutions outside of these regions that could destabilize the antibody or increase immunogenicity22. Despite these theoretical advantages, however, CR2 resulted from mutations randomly introduced into CR1 during the PCR process. Thus there is probably a role for using random mutagenesis in a systematic approach to increasing cross-reactivity. Modeling the framework mutations of CR2 into the co-crystal structure, however, provided no insight into the mechanism by which these mutations increased cross-reactivity. In other studies, framework mutations increased affinity indirectly by affecting the equilibrium adopted among different conformational forms of the antibody23 or by precisely positioning contact residue side chains for optimal electrostatic, hydrogen bonding or van der Waals interactions24.

There are reports in which protein engineering approaches have been used to change the specificity of antibodies to haptens; however, most of these efforts have sought to narrow rather than broaden specificity25,26,27,28. Where increases in affinity for related antigens have been reported, there were considerable decreases in affinity for the cognate antigen29. Despite this, there is a therapeutic and diagnostic need for broadening antibody cross-reactivity. In the case of botulism, the existence of multiple subtypes requires antibodies with broad cross-reactivity for diagnosis and treatment9. In viral diseases, such as HIV, SARS and hepatitis B, naturally occurring mutants can cause false negative results in diagnostic immunoassays30. This work shows that dramatic increases in cross-reactivity of protein-binding antibodies can be achieved and suggests a general approach to accomplish this. In the absence of a co-crystal structure, diversity should be widely introduced to assure mutagenesis of antibody regions unimportant for wild-type antigen binding and which interact with residues that differ between antigens. Use of a highly discriminative co-selection strategy, as employed here using yeast display, is essential to assure isolation of the most cross-reactive antibodies.

The increase in cross-reactivity obtained in this study results in a more than 100-fold increase in BoNT/A2 neutralization when CR2 is combined with the human BoNT/A antibodies RAZ1 and 2G11, compared to the combination with the parental AR2 mAb (T. Smith & J.D.M., unpublished data). As a result, the antibody generated from this study, CR2, is being manufactured along with RAZ1 and 2G11 for use as an antibody combination to treat botulism. Although formal toxicology studies have not yet been performed on the mAb combination, all three mAbs are human or humanized. Thus they should have substantially fewer side effects than equine antitoxin6. With the growing number of BoNT subtypes being discovered that have been primarily created by nature, or could be created through genetic engineering, it is critical that immune system technologies be adapted to target multiple subtypes at one time. The strategy demonstrated here provides a route for broadening the cross-reactivity of such mAbs. This approach will have substantial importance for generation of detection and therapeutic antibodies to BoNT as well as other antigens involved in disease processes.

Methods

Oligonucleotides.

Oligonucleotides for plasmid preparation for cloning site-directed mutagenic repertoires:

H2 for SphI: 5′-GTGGTGGTGGTTCTGCTAGCGGGGCCATGGCAT GGCATGCACCTACTATTCAGACAGTGTGGAGG-3′

H3 for SphI: 5′-GTGGTGGTGGTTCTGCTAGCGGGGCCATGGCAT GGCATGCGCTATGGACTACTGGGGCCAAGGC-3′

L1 for SphI: 5′-GTGGTGGTGGTTCTGCTAGCGGGGCCATGGCAT GGCATGCGGCCATAGTTTTATGCAGTGGTACC-3′

Spiked oligonucleotides for mutant library construction (synthesized by Biosource International). Spiked oligonucleotides were designed to retain either 25% or 50% wild-type amino acid at each of the five randomized amino acid positions, depending on wild-type codon usage.

H1 Rev: 5′-CTG GCG AAC CCA ATA CAT GTA 542 543 534 521 524 GAA TCC AGA G-3′

H2 Rev: 5′-TCG CCC CTC CAC ACT GTC TGA ATA GTA GGT 521 542 544 544 524-3′

H3 Rev: 5′-CAG GGT GCC TTG GCC CCA GTA GTC CAT AGC 524 524 521 542 521-3′

L1 Rev: 5′-CTG CTG GTA CCA CTG CAT AAA ACT ATG GCC 521 542 524 514 542-3′

where

1 = 70%A+10%T+10%G+10%C

2 = 70%T+10%A+10%G+10%C

3 = 70%G+10%T+10%A+10%C

4 = 70%C+10%T+10%G+10%A

5 = 50%G+50%C

Oligos to amplify scFv from expression vector pYD2 (ref. 12)

pYD For: 5′-AGT AAC GTT TGT CAG TAA TTG C-3′

pYD Rev: 5′-GTC GAT TTT GTT ACA TCT ACA C-3′

Gap 5′: 5′-TTAAGCTTCTGCAGGCTAGTG-3′

Gap 3′: 5′-GAGACCGAGGAGAGGGTTAGG-3′

Oligonucleotides for generation of IgG from scFv

C25 VH5′: 5′-GTACCAACGCGTGTCTTGTCCCAGGTCCAGCTGCAGGAGTCT-3′

CR2 VH5′: 5′-GTACCAACGCGTGTCTTGTCCCAGGTCCAGCTGCAGCAGTCT-3′

A2B4 VH3′: 5′-GTCTCCTGAGCTAGCTGAGGAGACGGTGACCAGGGT-3′

Oligos for construction of yeast-displayed BoNT/A HC

HC For: 5′-ATATAAACACCATGGCCACCTCCATCCTGAACCTGCGC-3′

HC Rev: 5′- TAGTATATATGCGGCCGCCAGCGGACGTTCACCCCAACC-3′

Cell lines, media, toxins and antibodies.

Yeast strain EBY100 (GAL1-AGA1::URA3 ura3-52 trp1 leu2Δ1 his3Δ200 pep4::HIS2 prb1Δ1.6R can1 GAL) was maintained in YPD (1% wt/vol yeast extract, 2% wt/vol peptone, 2% wt/vol dextrose) medium. EBY100 transfected with pYD2 was selected on selective growth dextrose casamino acids (SD-CAA) medium (0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.7% wt/vol yeast nitrogen base, 0.006% wt/vol Leucine, 2% wt/vol dextrose, 0.5% casamino acids). ScFv yeast surface display was induced by transferring yeast cultures from SD-CAA to selective growth galactose casamino acids (SG-CAA) medium (0.1M sodium phosphate, 0.7% wt/vol yeast nitrogen base, 0.006% wt/vol Leucine, 2% wt/vol galactose, 0.5% casamino acids) and grown at 20 °C for 48 h as described previously12. Bacteria strains Escherichia coli DH5α, (K12, Δ(lac-pro), supE, thi, hsdD5/F′ traD36, proA+B+, lacIq, lacZΔM15) and TOP10 (F mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) Φ80lacZΔM15 ΔlacX74 recA1 araD139 Δ(ara-leu)7697 galU galK rpsL (StrR) endA1 nupG) were used for cloning and preparation of plasmid DNA. Pure BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 were purchased from Metabiologics. Recombinant purified BoNT/A binding domain (HC) was prepared as previously described31. B4 (ref. 9) and SV5 (ref. 12) antibodies were purified from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and hybridoma supernatants, respectively, using Protein G and directly labeled with Alexa-488, using a kit provided by the manufacturer (Molecular Probes). For flow cytometry, purified IgGs 7C1 (ref. 9), 3D12 (ref. 8), B4 (ref. 9), S25 (ref. 8), and BoNT/A subtypes A1 and A2 were directly labeled with Alexa-647 using a kit provided by the manufacturer (Molecular Probes).

Creation of a library of H1 mutants of AR2 scFv.

A spiked oligonucleotide (H1Rev) was used to introduce mutations into five amino acids located in the H1 loop of the AR2 scFv as previously described (Table 1)12. The oligonucleotide was designed to have a bias for 25% or 50% wild-type amino acid at each position, depending on codon usage. Library size was 2.0 × 105 transformants, with 27% of the unselected library expressing scFv as determined by staining with SV5 antibody and 3.65% binding BoNT/A1.

Construction of pYD vectors for creating H2, H3 or L1 mutant libraries of CR1.

Primers H2ForSphI, H3ForSphI or L1ForSphI and Gap 3′ were designed to clone different segments of the 3′ end of AR2 or CR1 scFv32 into pYD2 (ref. 12) by PCR and add a 5′ SphI restriction site. CR1 scFv cloned into pYD2 was used as the template for 30 cycles of PCR with 50 °C annealing temperature using Pfu polymerase. The pYD2 vector was digested with Nco1 and NotI. Vector and one of the three PCR products were gel purified and mixed together to transform yeast EBY100 by gap repair12. The presence of the correct insert in each of the three resulting vectors (pYDH2, pYDH3 or pYDL1) was confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. Plasmid DNA was extracted from yeast containing each of the three plasmids and was used to transform E. coli. One Shot TOP10 chemically competent cells, following the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). Each of the three plasmids was purified from TOP10 for use in library construction.

Creation of libraries of H2, H3 or L1 mutants of CR1.

Libraries of site-directed mutants were constructed using parsimonious mutagenesis as previously described15,33. Briefly, partially degenerate primers (H2Rev, H3Rev and L1Rev) were designed to introduce mutations into five amino acids located in either the H2, H3 or L1 antigen-binding loops of the scFv (see Table 1)13,34. The oligonucleotides were designed to have a bias for 25% or 50% wild-type amino acid at each position, depending on codon usage. The degenerate primers and the primer Gap 5′ were used to amplify by PCR the corresponding 5′ end of the CR1 scFv gene in pYD2, and the three PCR products were gel purified. The remainder of the scFv gene was already cloned into pYD2 (pYD2H, pYD3H and pYD1L), as described above. Gel purified scFv gene repertoires (5 μg) were combined with the appropriate vector DNA (pYD2H, pYD3H or pYD1L, 10 μg digested with Nco1 and Sph1) and the DNA mixtures used to transform EBY100 using gap repair35. Library sizes were 3.4, 3.6 and 4.7 × 108 and expression frequencies and BoNT/A1 binding frequencies were 51%/8.9%, 53%/21.8% and 62%/7% for the unselected H2, H3 and L1 libraries, respectively.

Selection of mutant scFv libraries.

For library selection, an amount of yeast at least ten times larger than the library size, or the sort output from the previous round, was washed and resuspended in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, 1% BSA) to which the desired concentration of pure BoNT/A was added. Selections were generally performed after allowing the reaction mixture to come to equilibrium. The volume for incubation of yeast with toxin was chosen to ensure that toxin was in at least a fivefold excess over the number of scFvs (assuming 5 × 105 scFv/yeast36). Incubation times were chosen to ensure that the reaction had come to at least 90% of equilibrium, using the formula:

where t = time, Θ = fraction of equilibrium desired (in this case 0.9), kon = association rate constant, koff = dissociation rate constant and C = antigen concentration. For the calculation, the association and dissociation rate constants for AR2 IgG binding to BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 were used. For co-incubations with BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 the result giving the longer incubation time was used.

For selection of cross-reactive antibodies binding both BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2, BoNT/A concentrations for the five rounds of sorting the AR2 mutant library were 10 nM BoNT/A1, 20 nM BoNT/A2, 2 nM BoNT/A2, 1 nM BoNT/A2 and 0.4 nM BoNT/A2. For selection of CR1 mutant libraries, toxin concentrations for the six rounds of selection were: 1 nM BoNT/A1, 0.4 nM BoNT/A2, 0.1 nM BoNT/A2, 0.05 nM BoNT/A2, 0.025 nM BoNT/A1 HC plus 0.025 nM BoNT/A2 and for the final round of sorting 0.0075 nM BoNT/A1 HC plus 0.01 nM BoNT/A2. After incubation with toxin, cells were washed with ice-cold FACS buffer and resuspended in a 1:200 dilution of secondary antibodies as follows: (i) for BoNT/A1 or BoNT/A2 staining, 3D12-647 was added to detect toxin binding and SV5-488 was added to quantify scFv expression; (ii) for BoNT/A2 plus BoNT/A1 HC staining, mAb B4 (binds BoNT/A1 HC) followed by goat anti-human IgG-PE (R-Phycoerythrin F(ab′)2 from Jackson ImmunoReasearch) was used to detect BoNT/A1 binding, mAb 7C1-647 (binds BoNT/A LC, not HC) was added to detect BoNT/A2 binding, and SV5-488 was added to quantify scFv expression. Cells were incubated for 30 min with secondary antibodies at 4 °C, washed once with FACS buffer, resuspended in 0.2–2 ml of FACS buffer and sorted on a FACSAria (Becton-Dickinson). Typically 0.1% to 1% of yeast exhibiting both scFv expression and toxin binding were gated for collection from the single-toxin stains. For the dual-toxin stains, the brightest population for BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 binding was gated, the gates intersected and only yeast in both gates collected. Collected cells were grown in SD-CAA medium and used for the next round of sorting after induction in SG-CAA medium.

Measurement of yeast-displayed scFv affinity for BoNT/A.

Quantitative equilibrium binding was determined using yeast-displayed scFv and flow cytometry as described previously37. In general, six to eight different concentrations of pure BoNT/A were used spanning a range of concentrations from ten times above to ten times below the KD. Incubation volumes and number of yeast stained were chosen to keep the number of antigen molecules in fivefold excess above the number of scFv, assuming 5.0 × 105 scFv/yeast. Incubation times were chosen based on anticipated times to equilibrium calculated using approximations of the anticipated association rate constant (kon) and dissociation rate constant (koff) (see above). For the higher affinity scFv, this was as long as 18–24 h. Binding of BoNT/A to yeast-displayed scFv was detected using a 1:200 dilution of 1 mg/ml mAb binding a nonoverlapping BoNT/A epitope (3D12) labeled with Alexa-647. To measure the antibody-toxin affinity constant (KD) within the surface display context, only the scFv displaying yeast (SV5 binding) were included in the analysis by co-staining with SV5-Alexa-488. Each KD was determined in triplicate, three separate inductions and measurements.

Generation of IgG from scFv.

IgGs were generated from the genes encoding CR1 and CR2 scFv as previously described8. Briefly, genes encoding scFv VH were amplified using PCR from their respective pYD2 vectors with the primer pairs C25 VH5′ and A2B4 VH3′ for CR1 and CR2. The VH genes from CR1 and CR2 were digested with MluI and NheI and ligated into N5KG1containing the AR2 light chain variable region gene. Clones containing the correct VH were identified by DNA sequencing and vector DNA was used to transfect CHO DG44 cells by electroporation. Stable cell lines were established by selection in G418 and expanded into 1-liter spinner flasks. Supernatant containing IgG was collected, concentrated by ultrafiltration and purified on Protein G (Pharmacia). IgG purity was assessed by native and denaturing SDS-PAGE and concentration determined by absorbance at 280 nm. Yields after purification were 20, 25 and 50 mg/l of culture supernatant at a cell density of 5 × 105/ml for AR2, CR1 and CR2, respectively.

Measurement of solution phase affinity at equilibrium.

Equilibrium binding studies were conducted at 23 °C using a KinExA 3000 flow fluorimeter to quantify the free BoNT/A at equilibrium using varying concentrations of antibody. Studies of reaction mixtures were performed in PBS, pH 7.4, with 1 mg/ml BSA and 0.02% sodium azide as a preservative. Antibody was serially diluted into a constant concentration of BoNT/A sufficient to produce a reasonable signal, where the antibody concentration was varied from less than 0.1 to greater than tenfold above the value of the apparent KD. The BoNT/A concentrations were no more than fourfold above the KD to ensure a KD controlled experiment. Samples were allowed to reach equilibrium for as long as 2 d, then each of the 12 dilutions were passed over a flow cell with a 4-mm column of Azlactone beads (Sapidyne Instruments) covalently coated with the corresponding antibody to capture the free BoNT/A. Passing an Alexa-647–labeled BoNT/A antibody binding a nonoverlapping epitope over the beads produced a signal relative to the amount of free BoNT/A bound to the beads. All data points were run in duplicate and sample volume varied from 4 to 25 ml depending on antibody affinity. The equilibrium titration data were fit to a 1:1 reversible binding model using KinExA Pro Software (Version 1.0.2; Sapidyne Instruments) to determine the KD38.

Measurement of solution phase kinetics.

The kon of all antibody/antigen complexes was measured using the following 'direct method'. Antibody and BoNT/A were mixed together, then 1–2 ml of solution was passed over a freshly packed flow cell with antibody-coated beads39. Passing an Alexa-647–labeled BoNT/A antibody binding a nonoverlapping epitope over the beads produced a signal relative to the amount of free BoNT/A bound to the beads. No fewer than ten samples were sequentially analyzed, with the time between samples 500 s. The exponential decrease in the concentration of free BoNT/A as a function of time was fit to a standard bimolecular rate equation using the KinExA Pro Software to determine the kon. The koff was calculated from the product of kon × KD38.

Protein expression and purification for X-ray crystallography.

Fab fragments were prepared from purified IgG using immobilized papain (Pierce Biotechnology). Briefly, IgG was concentrated to 12 mg/ml in 20 mM phosphate, 10 mM EDTA pH 7.0, then added to an equal volume of immobilized papain resin (washed with 20 mM phosphate, 10 mM EDTA, 20 mM cysteine pH 7.0) and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. The immobilized papain was removed by centrifugation at 2,000g, and the digest supernatant was dialyzed against 10 mM MES pH 5.6. The Fab fragment was separated from undigested IgG and FC fragments by cation exchange chromatography (HiTrap High Performance Sulfopropyl column, GE Healthcare) using a salt gradient. The purified Fab was then dialyzed against PBS and stored at 4 °C.

The ammonium sulfate–precipitated BoNT/A1 was collected by centrifugation at 16,000g and dissolved in 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 and 50 mM NaCl, as previously described40. A 1:1.2 molar ratio of BoNT/A1 and CR1 Fab was mixed to form the BoNT/A1-CR1 complex followed by a final gel-filtration chromatography step. The protein complex was then concentrated to 7 mg/ml by centrifugal ultrafiltration.

Crystallization and data collection.

The BoNT/A1-CR1 complex was crystallized by the nanodroplet vapor diffusion method at a temperature of 297 K by mixing 100 nl of 7 mg/ml BoNT/A1-CR1 solution (10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl) with 100 nl of the reservoir solution containing 8% PEG 20000, 8% PEG 550 MME, 200 mM calcium acetate and 100 mM sodium acetate at pH 5.5. Plate-shaped crystals were transferred to mother liquor solutions of increasing concentrations of PEG 550 MME (up to 20%) before harvesting and flash freezing in liquid nitrogen.

Diffraction data were collected at a wavelength of 1.000 Å at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL) on beam line 11-1 and at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) on beam line GM-CAT. The SSRL data set was collected at 100 K using an ADSC q310 CCD detector, whereas APS data set used a MARmosaic 300 detector. Data were integrated, reduced and scaled using HKL2000 (ref. 41). The BoNT/A1-CR1 crystal was indexed in the orthorhombic space group P212121 at a resolution of 2.6 Å, whereas the BoNT/A1-AR2 indexed as P21 at a resolution of 3.8 Å data statistics are summarized in Supplementary Table 2 online.

Structure determination and refinement.

The BoNT/A1-CR1 structure was determined by molecular replacement using the BoNT/A1 structure (PDB code 3BTA40) and the parent Fab structure HuC25 (S. LaPorte, R. Stroud and J.D.M., unpublished data) with 99% identity to CR1 as the search models with the program MolRep42. The BoNT/A1-CR1 model was manually built with Coot43. Structure refinement was performed using REFMAC544. The progress of the model refinement was monitored by cross-validation Rfree, which was computed from a randomly assigned test set comprising 5% of the data. Refinement statistics are summarized in Supplementary Table 2 online. No electron density was observed for residues 433-452 and 623-626 of BoNT/A1. Analysis of the stereochemical quality of the model was accomplished using Molprobity45 and the AutoDepInputTool (http://deposit.pdb.org/adit/). The BoNT/A1-AR2 structure was solved using the BoNT/A1-CR1 structure as a search model. Figures were prepared with PYMOL (DeLano Scientific). Atomic coordinates and experimental structure factors of BoNT/A1-CR1 BoNT/A1-AR2 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with the accession numbers 2NYY and 2NZ9 respectively. Residue numbering of BoNT/A1 and A2 were assigned as found in GenBank under the accession numbers AF488749 and X73423.

Sequence alignment and structural analysis.

Amino acid sequences of BoNT/A subtypes A1 and A2 were aligned using Clustal W46. A gap opening penalty of 10 and gap extension penalty of 0.2 were used with the Gonnet matrix. The alignment figure was prepared with the Clustal W alignment using ESPript using DSSP secondary structure assignments47. Structure superpositions and root-mean square deviation (r.m.s. deviation) calculations were carried out using the program TOP48. Hydrogen bonding, salt bridges and van der Waals contacts were identified with the program CONTACTS44. Buried surface areas were calculated with NOC (http://noc.ibp.ac.cn/index.htm) with a 1.4 Å probe radius and standard van der Waals radii. The S902E, K903R, T1063P and H1064R changes found in BoNT/A2 were modeled by PYMOL.

Construction of yeast-displayed BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 HC domains.

Primers HCFor and HCRev were designed to amplify a synthetic BoNT/A1 HC gene fragment by PCR49, adding the restriction sites NcoI and NotI to the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively. The PCR product and pYD2 were digested with NcoI and NotI, ligated and the ligation mixture used to transform EBY100. Clones containing the correct insert were confirmed by DNA sequencing to yield pYD2/BoNT/A1 HC. A BoNT/A2 HC was constructed by mutating all seven BoNT/A1 HC amino acids in the structural epitope of CR1-BoNT/A1 (S902D, F917I, N954S, S955K, S957N, T1063P and H1064R) as well as three nearby residues, K903R, Q915K and K923T, to their BoNT/A2 counterparts. This approach was chosen, rather than changing all 45 amino acids that differ between BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 HC, to minimize the probability that the BoNT/A2 HC might not display on yeast well and to simplify construction. Construction of the BoNT/A2 HC was accomplished using PCR to introduce the BoNT/A2 residues into the relevant BoNT/A1 HC gene fragment and a combination of gap repair and restriction digestion to combine the gene fragments. Clones containing the correct insert were confirmed by DNA sequencing to yield pYD2/BoNT/A2 HC.

Construction of yeast-displayed BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 HC alanine mutants.

Genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin HC fragments in pYD2 with a single alanine substitution were constructed by using PCR and gap repair as described above for creation of BoNT/A2 HC. Insertion of the correct alanine mutation was confirmed by resequencing the entire BoNT/A HC gene. After induction, mutant BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 HC had display levels resulting in at least a 1.5 log shift when stained with SV5-Alexa-488, comparable to the levels of wild-type BoNT/A HC display.

Measurement of the affinity of CR1 and AR2 Fab fragments for yeast-displayed BoNT/A HC mutants.

The dissociation equilibrium constants (KD) of AR2 and CR1 Fab fragments for wild-type and alanine mutants of yeast-displayed BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 HC were measured by flow cytometry on a LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). First, EBY100 yeast cultures harboring the pYD2/HC wild type or the pYD2/HC alanine mutant plasmids were grown and induced as described above for yeast-displayed scFv. Aliquots of 1 × 105 induced yeast cells (0.005 OD600 ml−1) were washed in FACS buffer and incubated with dilutions (ranging from 15 μM to 16 pM) of AR2 or CR1 Fab fragments such that the KD would be spanned by at least fivefold, where possible. Incubation volumes were chosen to ensure that a tenfold molar excess of the antibody (ligand) over the displayed moiety (HC) would be maintained. For this purpose, it was assumed that 105 HC copies were displayed on the yeast surface. Incubation with AR2 or CR1 Fab was allowed to proceed for 4 h at 23 °C. Cells were then washed in FACS buffer and resuspended in allophycocyanin-conjugated Fab-specific goat-anti-human F(ab)′2 at 1:200 dilution in FACS buffer. To accurately determine the KD of AR2 and CR1 Fab fragments within the surface display context, we included only HC displaying yeast in the analysis by staining with SV5 (Alexa-488) mAb50.

Calculation of the change in free energy of binding of BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 alanine mutants.

For each BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 HC alanine mutation, the change of free energy (ΔΔGmut-wt) between the BoNT/A1 HC alanine (Ala) mutant relative to that of the wild type or between the BoNT/A2 HC Ala mutant relative to that of the wild-type (wt) BoNT/A2 HC was calculated using the following standard formula and using the previously measured KD constants:

Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Biotechnology website.

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control. Botulism in the United States, 1899–1998. Handbook for Epidemiologists, Clinicians, and Laboratory Workers (US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, Georgia, 1998). 〈http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/botulism/index.asp〉.

  2. Arnon, S.S. et al. Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285, 1059–1070 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. United States Security Council. Tenth report of the executive committee of the special commission established by the secretary-general pursuant to paragraph 9 (b) (I) of security council resolution 687 (1991) and paragraph 3 of resolution 699 (1991) on the activities of the Special Commission Council. (United Nations Security Council, New York, 1995) 〈http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/s/s1995-1038.htm〉.

  4. Bozheyeva, G., Kunakbayev, Y. & Yeleukenov, D . Former Soviet Biological Weapons Facilities in Kazakhstan: Past, Present, and Future (Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, California, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Franz, D.R., Pitt, L.M., Clayton, M.A., Hanes, M.A. & Rose, K.J . Efficacy of prophylactic and therapeutic administration of antitoxin for inhalation botulism in Botulinum and Tetanus Neurotoxins: Neurotransmission and Biomedical Aspects (ed. B.R. DasGupta) 473–476, (Plenum Press, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black, R.E. & Gunn, R.A. Hypersensitivity reactions associated with botulinal antitoxin. Am. J. Med. 69, 567–570 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amersdorfer, P. et al. Genetic and immunological comparison of anti-botulinum type A antibodies from immune and non-immune human phage libraries. Vaccine 20, 1640–1648 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nowakowski, A. et al. Potent neutralization of botulinum neurotoxin by recombinant oligoclonal antibody. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11346–11350 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, T.J. et al. Sequence variation within botulinum neurotoxin serotypes impacts antibody binding and neutralization. Infect. Immun. 73, 5450–5457 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Willems, A., East, A.K., Lawson, P.A. & Collins, M.D. Sequence of the gene coding for the neurotoxin of Clostridium botulinum type A associated with infant botulism: comparison with other clostridial neurotoxins. Res. Microbiol. 144, 547–556 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson, D.E. et al. The complete amino acid sequence of the Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin, deduced by nucleotide sequence analysis of the encoding gene. Eur. J. Biochem. 189, 73–81 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Razai, A. et al. Molecular evolution of antibody affinity for sensitive detection of botulinum neurotoxin type A. J. Mol. Biol. 351, 158–169 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chothia, C. et al. Structural repertoire of the human VH segments. J. Mol. Biol. 227, 799–817 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, T.T. & Kabat, E.A. An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity. J. Exp. Med. 132, 211–250 (1970).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schier, R. et al. Isolation of picomolar affinity anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv by molecular evolution of the complementarity determining regions in the center of the antibody binding site. J. Mol. Biol. 263, 551–567 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, W-P. et al. CDR walking mutagenesis for the affinity maturation of a potent human anti-HIV-1 antibody into the picomolar range. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 392–403 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. James, L.C., Roversi, P. & Tawfik, D.S. Antibody multispecificity mediated by conformational diversity. Science 299, 1362–1367 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sethi, D.K., Agarwal, A., Manivel, V., Rao, K.V. & Salunke, D.M. Differential epitope positioning within the germline antibody paratope enhances promiscuity in the primary immune response. Immunity 24, 429–438 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Betz, A.G., Rada, C., Pannell, R., Milstein, C. & Neuberger, M.S. Passenger transgenes reveal intrinsic specificity of the antibody hypermutation mechanism: clustering, polarity, and specific hot spots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2385–2388 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner, S.D., Milstein, C. & Neuberger, M.S. Codon bias targets mutation. Nature 376, 732 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cumbers, S.J. et al. Generation and iterative affinity maturation of antibodies in vitro using hypermutating B-cell lines. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 1129–1134 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ewert, S., Honegger, A. & Pluckthun, A. Stability improvement of antibodies for extracellular and intracellular applications: CDR grafting to stable frameworks and structure-based framework engineering. Methods 34, 184–199 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foote, J. & Milstein, C. Conformational isomerism and the diversity of antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10370–10374 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mian, I.S., Bradwell, A.R. & Olson, A.J. Structure, function and properties of antibody binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 217, 133–151 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dubreuil, O. et al. Fine tuning of the specificity of an anti-progesterone antibody by first and second sphere residue engineering. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 24880–24887 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Korpimaki, T. et al. Engineering of a broad specificity antibody for simultaneous detection of 13 sulfonamides at the maximum residue level. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 40–47 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krykbaev, R.A., Tsantili, P., Jeffrey, P.D. & Margolies, M.N. Modifying specificity of antidigoxin antibodies using insertional mutagenesis. Protein Sci. 11, 2899–2908 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miyazaki, C. et al. Changes in the specificity of antibodies by site-specific mutagenesis followed by random mutagenesis. Protein Eng. 12, 407–415 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Werther, W.A. et al. Humanization of an anti-lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA)-1 monoclonal antibody and reengineering of the humanized antibody for binding to rhesus LFA-1. J. Immunol. 157, 4986–4995 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Coleman, P.F. Detecting hepatitis B surface antigen mutants. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12, 198–203 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Byrne, M.P., Smith, T.J., Montgomery, V.A. & Smith, L.A. Purification, potency, and efficacy of the botulinum neurotoxin type A binding domain from Pichia pastoris as a recombinant vaccine candidate. Infect. Immun. 66, 4817–4822 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Poul, M-A., Becerril, B., Nielsen, U.B., Morrison, P. & Marks, J.D. Selection of internalizing human antibodies from phage libraries. J. Mol. Biol. 301, 1149–1161 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schier, R. et al. Identification of functional and structural amino-acid residues by parsimonious mutagenesis. Gene 169, 147–155 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tomlinson, I.M., Cox, J.P., Gherardi, E., Lesk, A.M. & Chothia, C. The structural repertoire of the human Vk domain. EMBO J. 14, 4628–4638 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Orr-Weaver, T.L. & Szostak, J.W. Yeast recombination: the association between double-strand gap repair and crossing-over. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 4417–4421 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Boder, E.T. & Wittrup, K.D. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 15, 553–557 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Boder, E.T., Midelfort, K.S. & Wittrup, K.D. Directed evolution of antibody fragments with monovalent femtomolar antigen-binding affinity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10701–10705 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Drake, A.W., Myszka, D.G. & Klakamp, S.L. Characterizing high-affinity antigen/antibody complexes by kinetic- and equilibrium-based methods. Anal. Biochem. 328, 35–43 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Blake, R.C., II, Pavlov, A.R. & Blake, D.A. Automated kinetic exclusion assays to quantify protein binding interactions in homogeneous solution. Anal. Biochem. 272, 123–134 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lacy, D.B., Tepp, W., Cohen, A.C., DasGupta, B.R. & Stevens, R.C. Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 898–902 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Meth. Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. MOLREP: an automated program for molecular replacement. J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 1022–1025 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. D60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Collaborative Computational Project Number 4 The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. D50, 760–763 (1994).

  45. Davis, I.W., Murray, L.W., Richardson, J.S. & Richardson, D.C. MolProbity: structure validation and all-atom contact analysis for nucleic acids and their complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W615–W619 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. Clustal-W—improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gouet, P., Courcelle, E., Stuart, D.I. & Metoz, F. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 15, 305–308 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lu, G.G. TOP: a new method for protein structure comparisons and similarity searches. J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 176–183 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Clayton, M.A., Clayton, J.M., Brown, D.R. & Middlebrook, J.L. Protective vaccination with a recombinant fragment of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin serotype A expressed from a synthetic gene in Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 63, 2738–2742 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. VanAntwerp, J.J. & Wittrup, K.D. Fine affinity discrimination by yeast surface display and flow cytometry. Biotechnol. Prog. 16, 31–37 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank William H. Tepp and Eric A. Johnson for providing botulinum neurotoxin. This work was partially supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) R21 grant AI53389-01 (J.D.M.), NIAID cooperative agreement U01 AI056493 (J.D.M.), Department of Defense contract DAMD17-03-C-0076 (J.D.M.), UC MEXUS-CONACYT Faculty Visit Fellowship (C.G.-R.) and Pacific Southwest Regional Center of Excellence grant U54 AI065359 (R.C.S.). N5KG1 was a gift of Mitch Reff, (Biogen IDEC Inc.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D Marks.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Patent applications have been submitted by the Regents of the University of California with inventors including J.D.M., C.G., A.R., J.L. and I.G.

R.C.S. is a consultant for Allergan Inc.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Binding of AR2 and CR1 IgG to BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2 in solution.

Supplementary Table 1

Impact of structurally designed CR1 mutations on binding to BoNT/A1 and BoNT/A2.

Supplementary Table 2

Data on the CR1-BoNT/A1 co-crystal structure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia-Rodriguez, C., Levy, R., Arndt, J. et al. Molecular evolution of antibody cross-reactivity for two subtypes of type A botulinum neurotoxin. Nat Biotechnol 25, 107–116 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1269

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing