Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Response to GM soybeans—revisiting a controversial format

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Eldridge, A.C. & Kwolek, W.F. J. Ag. Food. Chem. 31, 394–396 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. <>

  3. Brake, D.G. & Evenson, D.P. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42, 29–36 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Padgette, S. et al. J. Nutr. 126, 702–716 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mebrahtu, T., Mohamed, A.I., Wang, C.Y. & Andebrhan, T. Plant Foods for Human Nutr. 59, 55–61 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Teshima, R. et al. J. Food Hyg. Soc. Japan. 41, 188–193 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu, Y., Li, D., Wang, F., Yin, J. & Jin, H. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 58, 295–310 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malatesta, M. et al. Cell Struct. Funct. 27, 173–180 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malatesta, M. et al. Eur. J. Histochem., 47, 385–388 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vecchio, L., Cisterna, B., Malatesta, M., Martin, T.E. & Biggiogera, B. Eur. J. Histochem. 48, 449–453 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

V.M. notes he is the chariman of CropGen (London), an information service directed at informing the UK public about agricultural biotechnology, which receives limited support from the biotech industry but acts entirely independently ( V.G. was employed for eight years by the Biotechnology Industry Organization in the past and now works as a consultant with some industry clients, none of which are involved in transgenic soy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Response to GM soybeans—revisiting a controversial format. Nat Biotechnol 25, 1356–1358 (2007).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing