Article | Published:

Approaching Hungarian Biotechnology

Bio/Technologyvolume 10pages14291432 (1992) | Download Citation


Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Anderson, C. 1992 Hungarian science confronts its past. Nature 335: 669–670.

  2. 2

    Take-off. 1992 The contribution of Hungary. January. pp. 41–43.

  3. 3

    Hungarian Chamber of Commerce. 1991 Investor's Guide to Hungary—1991. Foreign Investment Promotion Services of the HCC, Budapest, p. 30.

  4. 4

    Morocz, S., Donn, G., Nemeth, J. and Dudits, D. 1990 An improved system for the obtention of fertile regenerants via maize protoplasts isolated from a highly embryonic suspension culture. Theor Appl Genet. 80: 721–726.

  5. 5

    Fari, M., Turi, Z., Cillig, F. and Banki-Peredi, A. 1990 Comparative studies on in vitro regeneration of seedling explants in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L). Acta Horticulturae 290: 131–134.

  6. 6

    Dibner, M.D. and Burrill, G.S. 1988 Commercial biotechnology in Hungary: beyond small potatoes. Trends in Biotechnology 6: 180–184.

  7. 7

    Rimmington, A. 1989 Biotech in the Eastern Bloc. Bio/Technology 7: 133–136.

  8. 8

    Foreign Technology. 1991 Hungarian science faces an uncertain future. Volume 91, Number 20. pp. 2–3.

  9. 9

    The U.S.Agency for International Development is an exception, as applicants send their proposals directly to the U.S. headquarters of AID.

Download references

Author information


  1. assistant professor of management at the University of the Pacific, School of Business and Public Administration in Stockton, CA

    • Cynthia K. Wagner
  2. Program Manager of the U.S. Hungarian Science & Technology Joint Fund in Budapest, Hungary

    • Dora Groo


  1. Search for Cynthia K. Wagner in:

  2. Search for Dora Groo in:

About this article

Publication history

Issue Date