Companies with a significant intellectual property stake in China should put in place an effective protection and enforcement strategy against local and overseas competitors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Obstacles and opportunities in Chinese pharmaceutical innovation
Globalization and Health Open Access 24 March 2017
-
Contract Research Organizations (CROs) in China: integrating Chinese research and development capabilities for global drug innovation
Globalization and Health Open Access 19 November 2014
-
Public funding and private investment for R&D: a survey in China’s pharmaceutical industry
Health Research Policy and Systems Open Access 13 June 2014
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Yidong, G. Science 309, 735 (2005).
Yuanjia, H. et al. J. Med. Mark. 7, 295–300 (2007).
Jia H. Chinese manufacturers vie for piece of outsourcing pie. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1337 (2007).
Chem. Eng. News, May 19, 2008, citing Darrell Abernethy of US Pharmacopeia (USP).
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The Paris Convention, Madrid Agreement for the International Registration of Marks, the Berne Convention, the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), WIPO Copyright Treaty, WIPO Performance and Phonograms Treaty and the World Trade Organization.
Art. 25 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
Guo, J. & Xin, H. Science 314, 1232–1235 (2006).
According to statistics from the Supreme People's Court of China.
Art. 11 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
Art. 63(2)–(4), supra.
Rule 48 of Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court Concerning Several Issues on Application of Law to Trials of Civil Disputes over Patent Infringement (Discussion Draft, 10/27–29/2003).
Section 35 USC 271(e)(1). See Merck KGaA vs. Integra Life Sciences, 545 US 193 (2005); 496 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2007) and Proveris Scientific Corp v. InnovaSystems, Inc., No. 2007-1428 (Fed. Cir., 2008).
EU Directives 2001/82/EC Articles 13(1)–13(7) and 2001/83/EC and Articles 10(1)–10(5).
Art. 63 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
Art. 63(1), supra.
Art. 56, supra. See also, Rule 78, Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2001).
Rule 78 of Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2001).
Rule 81, supra.
For example, Art. 58 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
Rule 82 of Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2001).
Art. 62 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
Art. 57, supra.
Rule 63 of Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court Concerning Several Issues on Application of Law to Trials of Civil Disputes over Patent Infringement (Discussion Draft, 10/27–29/2003).
Tonghua Antaike Biological Engineering Co., Ltd. v. Lily France S.A.A., 2006, People's Republic of China Beijing Municipal No. 1 Intermediate People's Court, Judgment No. 7493.
Hengrui v. Aventis Pharma S.A., 2006, Shanghai Higher People's Court, People's Republic of China, Final Judgment No. 112.
Art. 61 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
Art. 60, supra.
Rule 21 of Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Relating to Application of Law to Adjudication of Cases of Patent Disputes (2001).
Art. 45 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
Art. 46, supra.
Id.
Rule 64 of Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2001).
Art. 22 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
Id.
Id.
Art. 26, supra.
Art. 33, supra.
Rule 25 of Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2001).
Art. 47 of Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (2000).
The SFDA was as a restructured agency from its predecessor, China State Drug Administration, which was established in 1998 from the merger of the Ministry of Health's Department of Drug Administration with the State Pharmaceutical Administration of China.
Approved by the State Council and promulgated by the State Medicine Administration in December, 1992, and became effective as of Jan. 1, 1993.
Art. 1 of Regulations on Administrative Protection for Pharmaceuticals (1993).
Art. 3, supra.
Art. 5, supra.
Art. 11, supra.
Art. 13, supra.
Art. 19, supra.
Art. 15, supra.
Art. 66, Provisions for Drug Registration (SFDA Order No. 28, 2007).
Art. 71 and Art. 69, supra.
Art. 20, supra.
Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98–417, 1984 Stat. 1538 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 21 & 35 USC). Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community Code Relating to Medicinal Products for Human Use.
Legislative activities in the US regarding biosimilars include “Pathway for Biosimilars Act” (H.R. 5629); “Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2007” (S. 1695); “Patient Protection and Innovative Biologic Medicines Act of 2007” (H.R. 1956); and “Access to Life-Saving Medicine Act” (H.R. 1038).
Art. 18 of Provisions for Drug Registration (SFDA Order No. 28, 2007).
Art. 12, supra.
According to SIPO, the third major reform to China's Patent Law is expected to go into effect in early 2009. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/yw/2008/200807/t20080731_413639.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The content of this article is not to be attributed to the authors' current, past or future clients or employers, nor should it be viewed or regarded as legal advice to anyone.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Deng, M. Enforcing pharmaceutical and biotech patent rights in China. Nat Biotechnol 26, 1235–1240 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1108-1235
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1108-1235
This article is cited by
-
Obstacles and opportunities in Chinese pharmaceutical innovation
Globalization and Health (2017)
-
Public funding and private investment for R&D: a survey in China’s pharmaceutical industry
Health Research Policy and Systems (2014)
-
Contract Research Organizations (CROs) in China: integrating Chinese research and development capabilities for global drug innovation
Globalization and Health (2014)
-
Emergence of biopharmaceutical innovators in China, India, Brazil, and South Africa as global competitors and collaborators
Health Research Policy and Systems (2012)