Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Report
  • Published:

Discovering novel ligands for macromolecules using X-ray crystallographic screening

Abstract

The need to decrease the time scale for clinical compound discovery has led to innovations at several stages in the process, including genomics/proteomics for target identification, ultrahigh-throughput screening1 for lead identification, and structure-based drug design2 and combinatorial chemistry3 for lead optimization. A critical juncture in the process is the identification of a proper lead compound, because a poor choice may generate costly difficulties at later stages. Lead compounds are commonly identified from high-throughput screens of large compound libraries, derived from known substrates/inhibitors, or identified in computational prescreeusing X-ray crystal structures2,4,5,6. Structural information is often consulted to efficiently optimize leads, but under the current paradigm, such data require preidentification and confirmation of compound binding. Here, we describe a new X-ray crystallography–driven screening technique that combines the steps of lead identification, structural assessment, and optimization. The method is rapid, efficient, and high-throughput, and it results in detailed crystallographic structure information. The utility of the method is demonstrated in the discovery and optimization of a new orally available class of urokinase inhibitors for the treatment of cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Pictorial summary of the crystallographic screening method.
Figure 2: Pictorial summary of lead identification by crystallographic screening and optimization by structure-based drug design for the anticancer target urokinase.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sundberg, S. High-throughput and ultra-high-throughput screening: solution- and cell-based approaches. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11, 47–53 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Verlinde, C.L. & Hol, W.G. Structure-based drug design: progress, results and challenges. Structure 2, 577–87 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Salemme, F., Spurlino, J. & Bone, R. Serendipity meets precision: the integration of structure-based drug design and combinatorial chemistry for efficient drug discovery. Structure 15, 319–324 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuntz, I. Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery. Science 257, 1078–1082 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shuker, S.B., Hajduk, P.J., Meadows, R.P. & Fesik, S.W. Discovering high affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR. Science 274, 1531–1534 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fejzo, J. et al. The SHAPES strategy: an NMR-based approach for lead generation in drug discovery. Chem. Biol. 6, 755–769 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen, K.N. et al. An experimental approach to mapping the binding surfaces of crystalline proteins. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 2605–2611 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodford, P.J. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important molecules. J. Med. Chem. 28, 849–857 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caflish, A., Miranker, A. & Karplus, M. Multiple copy simultaneous search and construction of ligands in binding sites: application to inhibitors of HIV-1 aspartic proteinase. J. Med. Chem. 36, 2142–2167 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuntz, I.D., Meng, E.C. & Shoichet, B.K. Structure-based drug design. Accounts Chem. Res. 27, 117–123 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Verlinde, C., Rudenko, G. & Hol, W. In search of new lead compounds for trypanosomiasis drug desgin: a protein structure-based linked-fragment approach. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 6, 131–147 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng, X. et al. Using electrospray ionization FTICR mass spectrometry to study competitive binding of inhibitors to carbonic anhydrase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 8859–8860 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, M., Shapiro, M.J. & Wareing, J.R. Screening mixtures by affinity NMR. J. Org. Chem. 62, 8930–8931 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Muchmore, S. et al. Automated crystal mounting and data collection for protein crystallography. Structure, in press.

  15. Verlinde, C., Kim, H., Berstein, B., Mande, S. & Hol, W. Antitrypanosomiasis drug development based on structures of glycolytic enzymes. In Structure-based drug design (ed. Veerapandian, P.) 365–394 (Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, NY; 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reuning, U. et al. Multifunctional potential of the plasminogen activation system in tumor invasion and metastasis. Int. J. Oncol. 13, 896–906 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carmeliet, P. et al. Physiological consequences of loss of plasminogen activator gene function in mice. Nature 368, 419–24 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nienaber, V., Wang, J., Davidson, D. & Henkin, J. Re-engineering of human urokinase provides a system for structure-based drug design at high resolution and reveals a novel bindng sub-site. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 7239–7248 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nienaber, V. et al. Structure-directed discovery of potent non-peptidic inhibitors of human urokinase which access a novel binding sub-site. Structure 8, 553–563 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Menear, K. Progress towards the discovery of orally active thrombin inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem. 5, 457–468 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daylight chemical information systems, I. (Mission Viejo, CA,).

  22. Price, S. & Nagai, K. Protein engineering as a tool for crystallography. Cur. Opin. Biotechnol. 6, 425–430 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Berman, H.M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray dIffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brunger, A.T. X-PLOR version 3.1 manual. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT; 1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Meadows, S. Fesik, and S. Betz for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript; J. Wang for preparation of the urokinase protein; and S. Muchmore and T. Rockway for discussions on the technique.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicki L. Nienaber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nienaber, V., Richardson, P., Klighofer, V. et al. Discovering novel ligands for macromolecules using X-ray crystallographic screening. Nat Biotechnol 18, 1105–1108 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/80319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/80319

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing