Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

The CREATE Act: increasing costs associated with the biotech industry?

A new law intended to promote collaborative research may end up costing the biotech industry more and inhibiting innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Mowery, C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N. & Ziedonis, A.A. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. (Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shapiro, C. Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting, in Innovation Policy and the Economy (eds. Jeffe, A., Lerner, J. & Stern, S.) 119–150 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heller, M.A. & Eisenberg, R.S. Science 280, 698–701 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Research Council. Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research and Innovation. Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2006).

  5. Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement Act of 2004 (the CREATE Act), P.L. 108-453.

  6. Madey v. Duke University, 307 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2002), cert. denied 123 S. Ct. 2639 (2003).

  7. Walsh, J.P., Cohen, W.M. & Arora, A. Science 299, 1021 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report on technology transfer of federally funded R&D (May 15, 2003). <http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/pcast.html>

  9. Boettiger, S. & Bennett, A.B. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 320–323 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oddzon Products, Inc. v. Just Toys, Inc. et al., 122 F.3d 1396 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

  11. Thorne, L.W., Ergenzinger, E.R. & Spruill, W.M. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 901–902 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cukier, K.N. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 249–251 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views presented are those of the authors and do not represent the policy or opinion of the government of the United States or any of its agencies. The authors are grateful to Paul Lombardo and Jonathan Moreno for their comments and suggestions on this article. This work was supported by funds provided by the Dean of the University of Virginia School of Medicine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Author notes

  1. Ann E. Mills, Donna T. Chen and Patti M. Tereskerz are at the Program in Ethics and Policy in Health Care at the Center for Biomedical Ethics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800758, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA. amh2r@virginia.edu

    • John J Gillon Jr
Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, A., Chen, D., Gillon, J. et al. The CREATE Act: increasing costs associated with the biotech industry?. Nat Biotechnol 24, 785–786 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0706-785

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0706-785

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing