Abstract
The number of software packages for kinetic modeling of biochemical networks continues to grow. Although most packages share a common core of functionality, the specific capabilities and user interfaces of different packages mean that choosing the best package for a given task is not trivial. We compare 12 software packages with respect to their functionality, reliability, efficiency, user-friendliness and compatibility. Although most programs performed reliably in all numerical tasks tested, SBML compatibility and the set-up of multicompartmentalization are problematic in many packages. For simple models, GEPASI seems the best choice for non-expert users. For large-scale models, environments such as Jarnac/JDesigner are preferable, because they allow modular implementation of models. Virtual Cell is the most versatile program and provides the simplest and clearest functionality for setting up multicompartmentalization.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hucka, M. et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 19, 524–531 (2003).
Cuellar, A.A. et al. An overview of CellML 1.1, a biological model description language. Simulation-Trans. Soc. Modeling Simul. Int. 79, 740–747 (2003).
Le Novere, N. et al. BioModels Database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D689–D691 (2006).
Sauro, H.M. et al. Next generation simulation tools: the Systems Biology Workbench and BioSPICE integration. OMICS 7, 355–372 (2003).
Hattne, J., Fange, D. & Elf, J. Stochastic reaction-diffusion simulation with MesoRD. Bioinformatics 21, 2923–2924 (2005).
Murray, J.D. Mathematical Biology: An Introduction (Springer, New York, 2004).
Savageau, M.A. Parameter sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating and comparing the performance of biochemical systems. Nature 229, 542–544 (1971).
Rohwer, J.M., Meadow, N.D., Roseman, S., Westerhoff, H.V. & Postma, P.W. Understanding glucose transport by the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:glycose phosphotransferase system on the basis of kinetic measurements in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34909–34921 (2000).
Funahashi, A., Tanimura, N., Morohashi, M. & Kitano, H. CellDesigner: a process diagram editor for gene-regulatory and biochemical networks. Biosilico 1, 156–162 (2003).
Dhar, P. et al. Cellware–a multi-algorithmic software for computational systems biology. Bioinformatics 20, 1319–1321 (2004).
Ramsey, S., Orrell, D. & Bolouri, H. Dizzy: stochastic simulation of large-scale genetic regulatory networks. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 3, 415–436 (2005).
You, L., Hoonlor, A. & Yin, J. Modeling biological systems using Dynetica–a simulator of dynamic networks. Bioinformatics 19, 435–436 (2003).
Mendes, P. Biochemistry by numbers: simulation of biochemical pathways with Gepasi 3. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 361–363 (1997).
Voit, E.O. & Ferreira, A. Analysis of Biochemical Systems: A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
King, R.B., Budd, R., Bassingthwaighte, J.B. & Kootsey, J.M. A simulation system for biological investigators. Proc. Summer Comput. Simul. Conf. 18, 386–389 (1986).
Kirkwood, T.B. et al. Towards an e-biology of ageing: integrating theory and data. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 243–249 (2003).
Slepchenko, B.M., Schaff, J.C., Macara, I. & Loew, L.M. Quantitative cell biology with the Virtual Cell. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 570–576 (2003).
Acknowledgements
R.A. acknowledges support by a Ramon y Cajal Investigator Award, from the Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia. A.S. and F.A. acknowledge fellowships BPD/9457/2002 and BPD/11487/2002, respectively, from FCT-Portugal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alves, R., Antunes, F. & Salvador, A. Tools for kinetic modeling of biochemical networks. Nat Biotechnol 24, 667–672 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0606-667
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0606-667
This article is cited by
-
Characteristics of mathematical modeling languages that facilitate model reuse in systems biology: a software engineering perspective
npj Systems Biology and Applications (2021)
-
Bayesian uncertainty analysis for complex systems biology models: emulation, global parameter searches and evaluation of gene functions
BMC Systems Biology (2018)
-
MiR-608 regulating the expression of ribonucleotide reductase M1 and cytidine deaminase is repressed through induced gemcitabine chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer cells
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2017)