Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

ELSI and bioterrorism countermeasures?

To the editor:

As outlined in a news item in your March issue (Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 256–267, 2004), the United States' proposed appropriations of billions of dollars for bioterror preparedness in 2005 and, presumably, beyond, constitute a scientific and sociopolitical endeavor unprecedented in scope. The only other undertaking that has approached this magnitude as “a major federal R&D priority” in recent history was the Human Genome Project (HGP). In contrast to the present initiative, however, it was recognized immediately that the HGP had ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) that needed to be the focus of concerted research efforts. With laudable foresight and responsibility, 3%–5% of the annual HGP budget was earmarked for ELSI research from the outset of the project. This begs a very important question: shouldn't a portion of the bioterror preparedness budget be similarly allocated to ELSI research?

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, S. ELSI and bioterrorism countermeasures?. Nat Biotechnol 22, 656 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0604-656a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0604-656a

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing