Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Report
  • Published:

β-Lactamase protein fragment complementation assays as in vivo and in vitro sensors of protein–protein interactions

Abstract

We have previously described a strategy for detecting protein–protein interactions based on protein interaction–assisted folding of rationally designed fragments of enzymes. We call this strategy the protein fragment complementation assay (PCA)1,2,3,4,5. Here we describe PCAs based on the enzyme TEM-1 β-lactamase (EC: 3.5.2.6), which include simple colorimetric in vitro assays using the cephalosporin nitrocefin and assays in intact cells using the fluorescent substrate CCF2/AM (ref. 6). Constitutive protein–protein interactions of the GCN4 leucine zippers and of apoptotic proteins Bcl2 and Bad, and the homodimerization of Smad3, were tested in an in vitro assay using cell lysates. With the same in vitro assay, we also demonstrate interactions of protein kinase PKB with substrate Bad. The in vitro assay is facile and amenable to high-throughput modes of screening with signal-to-background ratios in the range of 10:1 to 250:1, which is superior to other PCAs developed to date. Furthermore, we show that the in vitro assay can be used for quantitative analysis of a small molecule–induced protein interaction, the rapamycin-induced interaction of FKBP and yeast FRB (the FKBP-rapamycin binding domain of TOR (target of rapamycin)). The assay reproduces the known dissociation constant and number of sites for this interaction. The combination of in vitro colorimetric and in vivo fluorescence assays of β-lactamase in mammalian cells suggests a wide variety of sensitive and high-throughput large-scale applications, including in vitro protein array analysis of protein–protein or enzyme–protein interactions and in vivo applications such as clonal selection for cells expressing interacting protein partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The β-lactamase PCA strategy.
Figure 2: Validation of the chosen fragmentation site.
Figure 3: In vitro and in vivo protein–protein interaction studies using the TEM-1 β-lactamase PCA.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pelletier, J.N., Arndt, K.M., Pluckthun, A. & Michnick, S.W. An in vivo library-versus-library selection of optimized protein–protein interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 683–690 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Remy, I. & Michnick, S.W. Clonal selection and in vivo quantitation of protein interactions with protein-fragment complementation assays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5394–5299 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Remy, I., Wilson, I.A. & Michnick, S.W. Erythropoietin receptor activation by a ligand-induced conformation change. Science 283, 990–993 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Remy, I. & Michnick, S.W. Visualization of biochemical networks in living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 7678–7683 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Subramaniam, R., Desveaux, D., Spickler, C., Michnick, S.W. & Brisson, N. Direct visualization of protein interactions in plant cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 769–772 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zlokarnik, G. et al. Quantitation of transcription and clonal selection of single living cells with β-lactamase as reporter. Science 279, 84–88 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Michnick, S.W., Remy, I., Campbell-Valois, F.X., Vallee-Belisle, A. & Pelletier, J.N. Detection of protein–protein interactions by protein fragment complementation strategies. Methods Enzymol. 328, 208–230 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelletier, J.N., Campbell-Valois, F.X. & Michnick, S.W. Oligomerization domain-directed reassembly of active dihydrofolate reductase from rationally designed fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12141–12146 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matagne, A., Lamotte-Brasseur, J. & Frere, J.M. Catalytic properties of class A β-lactamases: efficiency and diversity. Biochem. J. 330, 581–598 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Philippon, A., Dusart, J., Joris, B. & Frere, J.M. The diversity, structure and regulation of β-lactamases. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 54, 341–346 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hallet, B., Sherratt, D.J. & Hayes, F. Pentapeptide scanning mutagenesis: random insertion of a variable five amino acid cassette in a target protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 1866–1867 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pieper, U., Hayakawa, K., Li, Z. & Herzberg, O. Circularly permuted β-lactamase from Staphylococcus aureus PC1. Biochemistry 36, 8767–8774 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, W. & Palzkill, T. A natural polymorphism in β-lactamase is a global suppressor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8801–8806 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sideraki, V., Huang, W., Palzkill, T. & Gilbert, H.F. A secondary drug resistance mutation of TEM-1 β-lactamase that suppresses misfolding and aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 283–288 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sattler, M. et al. Structure of Bcl-xL-Bak peptide complex: recognition between regulators of apoptosis. Science 275, 983–986 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, J., Zheng, X.F., Brown, E.J. & Schreiber, S.L. Identification of an 11-kDa FKBP12-rapamycin-binding domain within the 289-kDa FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein and characterization of a critical serine residue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 4947–4951 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyawaki, A. & Tsien, R.Y. Monitoring protein conformations and interactions by fluorescence resonance energy transfer between mutants of green fluorescent protein. Methods Enzymol. 327, 472–500 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rossi, F., Charlton, C.A. & Blau, H.M. Monitoring protein–protein interactions in intact eukaryotic cells by β-galactosidase complementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8405–8410 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whitney, M. et al. A genome-wide functional assay of signal transduction in living mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 1329–1333 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maveyraud, L., Pratt, R.F. & Samama, J.P. Crystal structure of an acylation transition-state analog of the TEM-1 β-lactamase. Mechanistic implications for class A β-lactamases. Biochemistry 37, 2622–2628 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to F.-X. C.-Valois for valuable insights and suggestions, Ingrid Remy, Annie Montmarquette, and Galia Ghaddar for protein fusion constructs, and Claudia Jomphe for aid with microscopic imaging experiments. We thank Roger Tsien (University of California at San Diego) for supplying us with CCF2/AM. This research was supported by the Burroughs-Wellcome Fund (BWF) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP82008 to S.W.M.; MOP4959 to L.-E. T.). A.G. is a recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche. S.W.M. is a Medical Research Council of Canada Scientist and holds a Canada Research Chair. L.-E. T. is a EJLB Foundation Scholar and a Michael Smith Scholar of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen W. Michnick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galarneau, A., Primeau, M., Trudeau, LE. et al. β-Lactamase protein fragment complementation assays as in vivo and in vitro sensors of protein–protein interactions. Nat Biotechnol 20, 619–622 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0602-619

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0602-619

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing