Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Results by direction of change in economic performance (GM – conventional).


  1. James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2009—The First Fourteen Years, 1996 to 2009 (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca, New York, USA, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sahai, S. & Rahman, S. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 26 July 2003, 3139–3141.

  3. Herring, R.J. Int. J. Mul. Res. Approaches 2, 145–159 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marra, M. & Piggott, N. in Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy (eds. Just, R.E., Alston, J.M. & Zilberman, D.) 145–178 (Springer Science and Business Media, New York, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Alston, J.M., Hyde, J., Marra, M. & Mitchell, P.D. AgBioForum 5, 71–84 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Qaim, M. & Traxler, G. Agric. Econ. 32, 73–86 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marra, M.C., Piggott, N.E. & Carlson, G.A. The Net Benefits, Including Convenience, of Roundup Ready Soybean: Results From a National Survey. Technical Bulletin 2004–3 (NSF Center for IPM, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fawcett, R. & Towery, D. Conservation Tillage and Plant Biotechnology: How New Technologies Can Improve the Environment By Reducing the Need to Plow (Conservation Tillage Information Center, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Givens, W.A. et al. Weed Technol. 23, 150–155 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Trigo, E.J. & Cap, E.J. Ten Years of Genetically Modified Crops in Argentine Agriculture (ArgenBio, Buenos Aires, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Qaim, M. & de Janvry, A. Environ. Dev. Econ. 10, 179–200 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bennett, R., Ismael, Y., Morse, S. & Shankar, B. J. Agric. Sci. 142, 665–674 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, J., Hu, R., Fan, C., Pray, C.E. & Rozelle, S. AgBioForum 5, 153–166 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Z. et al. Agric. Sci. China 8, 101–105 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bennett, R. et al. J. Dev. Stud. 42, 662–677 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wossink, A. & Denaux, Z.S. Agric. Syst. 90, 312–328 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cattaneo, M.G. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7571–7576 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ismael, Y., Bennett, R. & Morse, S. AgBioForum 5, 1–5 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pray, C., Ma, D., Huang, J. & Qiao, D. World Dev. 29, 813–825 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zambrano, P., Fonseca, L.A., Cardona, I. & Magalhaes, E. in Biotechnology and Agricultural Development: Transgenic Cotton, Rural Institutions and Resource-Poor Farmers (ed. Tripp, R.) 168–199 (Routledge, London, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., Naik, G. & Zilberman, D. Rev. Agr. Econ. 28, 48–58 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morse, S., Bennett, R. & Ismael, Y. AgBioForum 10, 44–50 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Traxler, G., Godoy-Avila, S., Falck-Zepeda, J. & De Jesus Espinoza-Arellano, J. in The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective (ed. Kalaitzandonakes, N.) 183–202 (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet E Carpenter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

This research was supported by CropLife International.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Tables 1,2,3 (PDF 143 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpenter, J. Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops. Nat Biotechnol 28, 319–321 (2010).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing