Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

Patenting pluripotence: the next battle for stem cell intellectual property

What will be the impact of induced pluripotent stem cell discoveries on the current stem cell patent landscape?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. USPTO Reexamination communication transmittal forms 90/008,102; 90/008,139 and 95/000,154 (mailed 30 March 2007).

  2. Takahashi, K. et al. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, J. et al. Science 318, 1917–1920 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. USPTO Communication 11/033,335 (mailed 13 December 2007).

  5. Williams, R. et al. US patent 5,166,065 (issued 24 November 1992).

  6. Hogan, B. US patent 5,453,357 (issued 26 September 1995; filed 8 October 1992).

  7. Hogan, B. US patent 5,690,926 (issued 25 November 1997; filed 25 March 1994).

  8. USPTO Control 95/000,154 (mailed 25 February 2008).

  9. USPTO Communication 90/088,102 (mailed 5 March 2008).

  10. Robertson E.J. in Teratocarcinoma Stem Cells, (eds. Silver, L.M. et al.) 647–683 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson E.J. (ed.) Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells, A Practical Approach 71–112 (IRL, Oxford; 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piedrahita J.A. et al. Theriogenology 34, 879–901 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shamblott, M.J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13726–13731 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 35 USC § 282.

  15. Plomer, A., Taymor, K. & Scott, C.T. Cell Stem Cell 2, 13–17 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 37 CFR §1.552; MPEP § 2258.

  17. Request for inter partes reexamination of '913 patent 2–3 <http://www.pubpat.org/assets/files/ warfstemcell/913Request.pdf>.

  18. Taymor, K.S., Scott, C.T. & Greely, H.T. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 411–413 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamanaka, S. WIPO patent WO/2007/069666 (published 21 June 2007; filed 6 December 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 101 USC § 102(e)(1).

  22. In re Marosi, 710 F.2d 798,802,218 USPQ 289,292 (Fed. Cir. 1983).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vrtovec, K., Scott, C. Patenting pluripotence: the next battle for stem cell intellectual property. Nat Biotechnol 26, 393–395 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0408-393

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0408-393

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing