Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Material transfer agreements: open science vs. proprietary claims

For academia and industry, MTAs are the means to widely differing ends.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Barton J.H. & Siebeck W.E. Material transfer agreements in genetic resources exchange: the case of the international agricultural research centers. Issues in Genetic Resources No. 1 (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Streitz W.D. et al. Material transfer agreements: a win-win for academia and industry. Annual meeting of the AUTM (AUTM, Northbrook, 2003).

  3. 3

    Council of Governmental Relations. Material Transfer in Academia (COGR, Washington, 1997).

  4. 4

    Whitaker, J.S. The prior art effect of material transfer agreements. J. Assoc. Univ. Technol. Managers VI, 1–10 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The author would like to thank Jean Gilbert for helpful comments on drafts of this article.

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodriguez, V. Material transfer agreements: open science vs. proprietary claims. Nat Biotechnol 23, 489–491 (2005).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing