Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The new fundamentalism

Nature Biotechnology volume 23, pages 415–416 (2005)Cite this article

Poles apart

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Five Year Freeze Campaign. Why a Five Year Freeze? http://www.fiveyearfreeze.org/indexb.htm

  2. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. Global Status of Biotech Crops in 2004. ISAAA Briefs No. 32-2004. (Manila, 2005). http://www.isaaa.org/kc/bin/ESummary/index.htm

  3. Conway, G. in 'GMOs—Ecological Dimensions (eds. van Emden, H.F. & Gray, A) in press (Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, UK, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karplus, V. International Herald Tribune, 8 October (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Potrykus, I. Plant Physiol. 125, 1160–1161 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucca, P., Richard, R. & Potrykus, I. J. Am. Coll. Nutrition 21, 184S–190S (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giddings, G., Allison, G., Brooks, D. & Carter, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1151–1155 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, J.K., Drake, P.M. & Christou, P. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 794–805 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peterson, R. & Arntzen, C. Trends Biotechnol. 22, 64–66 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, H.-X. & Blumwald, E. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 765–768 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The Use of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries (Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, UK, 2004).

  12. Bates, S.L., Zhao, J.-Z., Roush, R.T. & Shelton, A.M. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 57–62 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Losey, J.E., Rayor, L.S. & Carter, M.E. Nature 399, 214 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trewavas, A.J. & Leaver, C. EMBO Reports 2, 455–459 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shelton, A.M. & Sears, M.K. The Plant 27, 483–488 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Crichton, M. Speech to the Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, 15 September, 2003.

  17. House of Lords Select Committee on European Communities. 2nd Report: EC Regulation of Genetic Modification in Agriculture, Evidence Q1107 (House of Lords, UK, 1999).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Dick Taverne is chair of the charity Sense About Science, founded to promote the evidencebased approach to scientific issues. He is a member of the UK House of Lords and has developed a special interest in science and the environment. He recently published “The March of Unreason—Science, Democracy and the New Fundamentalism.”

Authors
  1. Dick Taverne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taverne, D. The new fundamentalism. Nat Biotechnol 23, 415–416 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0405-415

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0405-415

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing