European agbiotech crisis?

To the editor

The ongoing political controversy surrounding plant biotechnology in Europe is having serious negative consequences not only for the industry, but also for the conduct of plant biology. Modern plant biology involves the routine creation of genetically altered lines that are grown up for scientific evaluation. The impact of many genes on plant phenotype can only be evaluated under field conditions that are difficult to duplicate in the laboratory. However, the lack of political support for agricultural biotechnology in Europe has strongly discouraged such studies, as opposed to merely inhibiting the development of new products. Here, we present an analysis of publicly available data that documents this disturbing trend (Table 1).

Table 1 The rise and fall of GM field trials within the EU

The dramatic fall in the number of applications for field trials since 1997 might be attributed to a decline in commercial interest in plant biotechnology. However, inspection of a subset of these data for trees only, yields a different conclusion. Approximately 80% of the applications for the release of genetically modified (GM) trees do not involve a commercial organization, and all seem remote from any deployment. Thus, the decline in applications for field trials appears to reflect a real impact on the conduct of research to evaluate biotic and abiotic environmental effects on trees. The negative effects of this trend on woody plant biology in Europe will continue to be felt for many years to come.

The chilly political climate for plant biotechnology has often been blamed for the loss of commercial interest in plants, and the declining confidence of scientists in this discipline. To this list must also be added circumscription of the actual scientific enterprise.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenning, T., Gershenzon, J. European agbiotech crisis?. Nat Biotechnol 21, 360 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0403-360

Download citation