Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

California voters and CIRM—will lightning strike twice?

An Erratum to this article was published on 06 July 2018

A Correction to this article was published on 06 March 2018

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

  • 22 February 2018

    In the version of this article initially published, the statement that CIRM's Transition Committee “considered requesting $5-billion (or a total of $10-billion) from the electorate” should have read the “Committee heard a presentation for another $5-billion ($10-billion with interest) citizen-sponsored proposition.” The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeFrancesco, L. California voters and CIRM—will lightning strike twice?. Nat Biotechnol 36, 126–127 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing