Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

Workplace programs to protect trade secrets

Nature Biotechnology volume 21, pages 201–203 (2003)Cite this article

Trade secret protection programs can be effective in preventing the loss of valuable company information and intellectual property assets, if appropriately implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Frith, S. Scientist's passport held in possible biotech theft. Costra Costa Times June 5 (2002).

  2. Pair is charged with stealing trade secrets. J. Commerce September 9 (1997), p. 4A.

  3. Niiler, E. Biotech spies arrested in Harvard case. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 761–761 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lafferty, S. Justices parse 'claim' in state's trade secrets law. The Recorder November 22 (2002), p. 1.

  5. 18 USCA §§ 1831–1839 (West 1999).

  6. 35 USCA §§ 101, 102, and 103 (West 1994).

  7. 17 USC § 102.

  8. 15 USCA § 1127 (West 1994).

  9. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (ULA) § 1 (West Supp. 2002), and as adopted, e.g., by California. Cal. Civ. Code § 3426.1 (Deerings 2002). Trade secrets are governed by state law.

  10. Eagle Comtronics v. Pico, 453 NYS 2d 470 (4th Dept.), appeal denied, 58 NYS 2d 601 (1982).

  11. Trademark Off. Soc'y 371 (2002) (providing cost/benefit analysis of patent versus trade secret protection).

  12. Pub. L. No. 100-568, 102 Stat. 2853 (1989).

  13. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Co., 227 USPQ 18 (D. Del. 1985), cert. denied, 510 US 908 (1993).

  14. 950 F.Supp. 1348, 1364 (S.D. Ohio 1997).

  15. 155 F.3d 189 (3rd Cir. 1998).

  16. United States v. Martin, 228 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2000).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of associate Huong Nguyen and summer associate Ruby Wayne.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. senior associate, Bingham McCutchen LLP, 1900 University Avenue, East Palo Alto, 94303, CA

    Kerry Medd

  2. partner at Bingham McCutchen LLP, 1900 University Avenue, East Palo Alto, 94303, CA

    Antoinette Konski

Authors
  1. Kerry Medd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antoinette Konski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medd, K., Konski, A. Workplace programs to protect trade secrets. Nat Biotechnol 21, 201–203 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0203-201

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0203-201

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing