Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Japan's novelty grace period solves the dilemma of 'publish and perish'

Recent changes to Japanese patent law will salvage patent rights for potentially lucrative university-based inventions.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2


  1. Arai, H. AcTeB Rev. 15–16 (2003).

  2. Cohen, W.M. et al. in Challenges to Research Universities (eds. Cohen, L.R. et al.) 188–189 (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whittaker, D.H. in Crisis and Innovation in Asian Technology (eds. Keller, W.W. & Samuels, R.J.) 78 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cyranoski, D. Nature 429, 216 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Okubo, Y. & Kobayashi, S. Japan, 203 in UNESCO Science Report 2005 (UNESCO, Paris, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Japan Overview—Japan Restructures to Develop a Startup-Based Industry in Ernst & Young, Beyond Borders Global Biotechnology Report 2005 (2005).

  7. University-related tech licensing groups earn 5.2 times more in FY04. Nihon Keizai Shimbun (May 24, 2005).

  8. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. White Paper On Science And Technology 2004, Figure 3-3-10 (2005).

  9. Section 30(1) and 30(3) of Tokkyo Ho [Patent Law], Law No. 121 of 1959, as amended.

  10. Straus, J. 20 IIC Studies: Studies In Indus. Prop. & Copyright L. 1, 3.

  11. 35 USC §102(b).

  12. Japanese Patent Office. WIPO Doc. GP/CE/I/3, No. 28 (September 2000).

  13. Japan Patent Office. Annual Report 2005 (2004).

  14. Tamura, K. Asahi Shimbun (November 11, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP) et al. Science and technology indicators: 2004—a systematic analysis of science and technology activities in Japan. Data Updated 2005 248, 251–253 (April 2005).

  16. Bowker J. & Lyons, W. Scotsman (December 9, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Profitless prosperity. The Economist 379, 63 (22 April, 2006).

  18. Wilan, K.H. Chasing biotech, state by state—winners and losers. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 175–179 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Industrial Cluster Study Group, Ministry of Economy, Trade & Industry. Industrial cluster study report. 1, 31 (May 2005).

  20. Kuwamoto, F. Bio-venture activity suggests industry shakeout ahead. Nihon Keizai Shimbun July 28, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fuyuno, I. Nature 441, 280 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuyuno, I. Nature 442, 237 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tessensohn, J., Yamamoto, S. Japan's novelty grace period solves the dilemma of 'publish and perish'. Nat Biotechnol 25, 55–57 (2007).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing