The evidence gathered thus far—ultimately to be published in the Draft Risk Assessment on Animal Cloning—indicates that there are no unique risks associated with animal cloning.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. Animal Biotechnology: Science-Based Concerns (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2002).
Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A.E., McWhir, J., Kind, A.J. & Campbell, K.H. Nature 385, 810–813 (1997).
Prather, R.S. et al. Biol. Reprod. 37, 859–866 (1987).
Cibelli, J.B. et al. Science 280, 1256–1258 (1998).
Jones, P.A. & Takai, D. Science 293, 1068–1070 (2001).
Jaenisch, R. & Bird, A. Nat. Genet. 33 Suppl., 245–254 (2003).
Cezar, G.G. Cloning Stem Cells 5, 165–180 (2003).
Bourc'his, D. et al. Curr. Biol. 11, 1542–1546 (2001).
Dean, W. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 8, 13734–13738 (2001).
Kang, Y.K. et al. Nat. Genet. 28, 173–177 (2001).
Kang, Y.K. et al. FEBS Lett. 99, 55–58 (2001).
Kang, Y.K. et al. EMBO J. 21, 1092–1100 (2002).
Ohgane, J. et al. Genesis 30, 45–50 (2001).
Wilmut, I. Nat. Med. 8, 215–216 (2002).
Santos, F. et al. Curr. Biol. 13, 1116–1121 (2003).
Shi, W., Dirim, F., Wolf, E., Zakhartchenko, V. & Haaf, T. Biol. Reprod. 71, 340–347 (2004).
Chen, T. et al. Front. Biosci. 10, 3002–3008 (2005).
Yamazaki, Y. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 100, 12207–12212 (2003).
Chavatte-Palmer, P. et al. Biol. Reprod. 66, 1596–1603 (2002).
Surani, M.A. Nature 414, 122–128 (2001).
Yamazaki, Y. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11361–11366 (2005).
Avner, P. & Heard, E. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 59–67 (2001).
Heard, E. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 482–489 (2005).
Gauthier, M. et al. Cloning Stem Cells 3, 151–155 (2001).
Enright, B.P. et al. Biol. Reprod. 66, 291–296 (2002).
Pace, M.M. et al. Biol. Reprod. 67, 334–339 (2002).
Heyman, Y. et al. Cloning Stem Cells 6, 111–120 (2004).
Martin, M., Adams, C. & Wiseman, B. Theriogenology 62, 113–122 (2004).
Wells, D.N. Cloning Stem Cells 6, 101–110 (2004).
Shiga, K. et al. Theriogenology 64, 334–343 (2005).
Tecirlioglu, R.T. et al. Theriogenology 65 1783–1799 (2005).
Walker, S.C. et al. Theriogenology 67: 178–184 (2007)
Mir, B., Zaunbrecher, G., Archer, G.S., Friend, T.H. & Piedrahita, J.A. Cloning Stem Cells 7, 119–125 (2005).
Rudenko, L., Matheson, J.C., Adams, A.L., Dubbin, E.S. & Greenlees, K.J. Cloning Stem Cells 6, 79–93 (2004).
Hill, A.B. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 58, 295–300 (1965).
Tian, X.C. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6261–6266 (2005).
Walsh, M.K., Lucey, J.A., Govindasamy-Lucey, S., Pace, M.M. & Bishop, M.D. Cloning Stem Cells 5, 213–219 (2003).
International Food Information Council. IFIC Survey: Food Biotechnology Not A Top-Of-Mind Concern for American Consumers (2005). <http://www.ific.org/research/upload/2005BiotechSurvey.pdf>
Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. Public Sentiment about Genetically Modified Food (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, Washington, DC, 2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rudenko, L., Matheson, J. & Sundlof, S. Animal cloning and the FDA—the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny. Nat Biotechnol 25, 39–43 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0107-39
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0107-39
