Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Real-time measurement of protein–protein interactions at single-molecule resolution using a biological nanopore

Nature Biotechnology volume 37, pages 96–101 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are essential for many cellular processes. However, transient PPIs are difficult to measure at high throughput or in complex biological fluids using existing methods. We engineered a genetically encoded sensor for real-time sampling of transient PPIs at single-molecule resolution. Our sensor comprises a truncated outer membrane protein pore, a flexible tether, a protein receptor and a peptide adaptor. When a protein ligand present in solution binds to the receptor, reversible capture and release events of the receptor can be measured as current transitions between two open substates of the pore. Notably, the binding and release of the receptor by a protein ligand can be unambiguously discriminated in a complex sample containing fetal bovine serum. Our selective nanopore sensor could be applied for single-molecule protein detection, could form the basis for a nanoproteomics platform or might be adapted to build tools for protein profiling and biomarker discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Measuring high-affinity PPIs using a nanopore sensor.
Figure 2: Measuring low-affinity PPIs using a nanopore sensor.
Figure 3: Concurrent detection of weak and strong PPIs using a nanopore sensor.
Figure 4: Single-molecule protein detection and observation of transient PPIs using a nanopore sensor in FBS.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. Hayes, S., Malacrida, B., Kiely, M. & Kiely, P.A. Studying protein-protein interactions: progress, pitfalls and solutions. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 44, 994–1004 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo, J., Lee, T.S., Choi, B., Shon, M.J. & Yoon, T.Y. Observing extremely weak protein-protein interactions with conventional single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14238–14241 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Keersmaecker, H. et al. Mapping transient protein interactions at the nanoscale in living mammalian cells. ACS Nano 12, 9842–9854 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nogal, B., Bowman, C.A. & Ward, A.B. Time-course, negative-stain electron microscopy-based analysis for investigating protein-protein interactions at the single-molecule level. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 19400–19410 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez, L.C. Protein microarrays, biosensors, and cell-based methods for secretome-wide extracellular protein-protein interaction mapping. Methods 57, 448–458 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Douzi, B. Protein-protein interactions: surface plasmon resonance. Methods Mol. Biol. 1615, 257–275 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierce, M.M., Raman, C.S. & Nall, B.T. Isothermal titration calorimetry of protein-protein interactions. Methods 19, 213–221 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackmann, B. & Neher, E. Single-Channel Recording. Second edn. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, 1995).

  9. Wei, R., Gatterdam, V., Wieneke, R., Tampé, R. & Rant, U. Stochastic sensing of proteins with receptor-modified solid-state nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 257–263 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ying, Y.L., Yu, R.J., Hu, Y.X., Gao, R. & Long, Y.T. Single antibody-antigen interactions monitored via transient ionic current recording using nanopore sensors. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 53, 8620–8623 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weichbrodt, C. et al. Antibiotic translocation through porins studied in planar lipid bilayers using parallel platforms. Analyst 140, 4874–4881 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reiner, J.E. et al. Disease detection and management via single nanopore-based sensors. Chem. Rev. 112, 6431–6451 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deamer, D., Akeson, M. & Branton, D. Three decades of nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 518–524 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayub, M. & Bayley, H. Engineered transmembrane pores. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 34, 117–126 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burns, J.R., Seifert, A., Fertig, N. & Howorka, S. A biomimetic DNA-based channel for the ligand-controlled transport of charged molecular cargo across a biological membrane. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 152–156 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Howorka, S. Building membrane nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 619–630 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Movileanu, L., Howorka, S., Braha, O. & Bayley, H. Detecting protein analytes that modulate transmembrane movement of a polymer chain within a single protein pore. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1091–1095 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rotem, D., Jayasinghe, L., Salichou, M. & Bayley, H. Protein detection by nanopores equipped with aptamers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 2781–2787 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrington, L., Cheley, S., Alexander, L.T., Knapp, S. & Bayley, H. Stochastic detection of Pim protein kinases reveals electrostatically enhanced association of a peptide substrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E4417–E4426 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thakur, A.K., Larimi, M.G., Gooden, K. & Movileanu, L. Aberrantly large single-channel conductance of polyhistidine arm-containing protein nanopores. Biochemistry 56, 4895–4905 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Locher, K.P. et al. Transmembrane signaling across the ligand-gated FhuA receptor: crystal structures of free and ferrichrome-bound states reveal allosteric changes. Cell 95, 771–778 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schreiber, G. & Fersht, A.R. Interaction of barnase with its polypeptide inhibitor barstar studied by protein engineering. Biochemistry 32, 5145–5150 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schreiber, G. & Fersht, A.R. Energetics of protein-protein interactions: analysis of the barnase-barstar interface by single mutations and double mutant cycles. J. Mol. Biol. 248, 478–486 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deyev, S.M., Waibel, R., Lebedenko, E.N., Schubiger, A.P. & Plückthun, A. Design of multivalent complexes using the barnase*barstar module. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1486–1492 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kudlinzki, D., Schmitt, A., Christian, H. & Ficner, R. Structural analysis of the C-terminal domain of the spliceosomal helicase Prp22. Biol. Chem. 393, 1131–1140 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mohammad, M.M., Howard, K.R. & Movileanu, L. Redesign of a plugged beta-barrel membrane protein. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 8000–8013 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohammad, M.M. et al. Engineering a rigid protein tunnel for biomolecular detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 9521–9531 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Perkins, J.R., Diboun, I., Dessailly, B.H., Lees, J.G. & Orengo, C. Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. Structure 18, 1233–1243 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nivala, J., Mulroney, L., Li, G., Schreiber, J. & Akeson, M. Discrimination among protein variants using an unfoldase-coupled nanopore. ACS Nano 8, 12365–12375 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kennedy, E., Dong, Z., Tennant, C. & Timp, G. Reading the primary structure of a protein with 0.07 nm3 resolution using a subnanometre-diameter pore. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 968–976 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sze, J.Y.Y., Ivanov, A.P., Cass, A.E.G. & Edel, J.B. Single molecule multiplexed nanopore protein screening in human serum using aptamer modified DNA carriers. Nat. Commun. 8, 1552 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang, G., Willems, K., Soskine, M., Wloka, C. & Maglia, G. Electro-osmotic capture and ionic discrimination of peptide and protein biomarkers with FraC nanopores. Nat. Commun. 8, 935 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Restrepo-Pérez, L., Joo, C. & Dekker, C. Paving the way to single-molecule protein sequencing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 786–796 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Buckle, A.M., Schreiber, G. & Fersht, A.R. Protein-protein recognition: crystal structural analysis of a barnase-barstar complex at 2.0-A resolution. Biochemistry 33, 8878–8889 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Guillet, V., Lapthorn, A., Hartley, R.W. & Mauguen, Y. Recognition between a bacterial ribonuclease, barnase, and its natural inhibitor, barstar. Structure 1, 165–176 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McManus, O.B. & Magleby, K.L. Kinetic states and modes of single large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels in cultured rat skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 402, 79–120 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Loh for generosity in using his FPLC instrument in the very early stages of these studies and A. Matouschek (University of Texas at Austin) for his kindness in offering plasmids containing genes that encode Bn and Bs proteins, as well as M.L. Ghahari and M.M. Mohammad for their assistance in the very early stages of this project. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants GM088403 (L.M.) and GM129429 (L.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA

    Avinash Kumar Thakur & Liviu Movileanu

  2. Structural Biology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics Program, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA

    Avinash Kumar Thakur & Liviu Movileanu

  3. Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA

    Liviu Movileanu

Authors
  1. Avinash Kumar Thakur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liviu Movileanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.K.T. and L.M. designed research. A.K.T. performed research and analyzed data. A.K.T. and L.M. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liviu Movileanu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.K.T. and L.M. are named inventors on two provisional patent applications (US 62/720,190 and US 62/579,982) filed by Syracuse University on this work.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–14 and Supplementary Tables 1–8 (PDF 6811 kb)

Life Sciences Reporting Summary (PDF 131 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakur, A., Movileanu, L. Real-time measurement of protein–protein interactions at single-molecule resolution using a biological nanopore. Nat Biotechnol 37, 96–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4316

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4316

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research