EU court casts new plant breeding techniques into regulatory limbo

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Purnhagen, K.P. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 573–575 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    European Union. Opinion of Advocate General Bobek. InfoCuria. (2018).

  3. 3

    European Union. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber). InfoCuria. (2018).

  4. 4

    Purnhagen, K. & Rebasti, E. Eur. J. Legal Stud. 1, 13–21 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Purnhagen, K. & Wesseler, J. in The Coexistence of Genetically Modified, Organic and Conventional Foods (eds. Kalaitzandonakes, N. et al.) 149–165 (Springer, New York, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Ahloowalia, B.S., Maluszynski, M. & Nichterlein, K. Euphytica 135, 187–204 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Shirasawa, K., Hirakawa, H., Nunome, T., Tabata, S. & Isobe, S. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 51–60 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    van der Wiel et al. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 11, 1–8 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Fernandez, O. et al. Metabolomics 12, 158 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Smart, R., Blum, M. & Wesseler, J. Ger. J. Agric. Econ. 64, 244–262 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai P Purnhagen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Purnhagen, K., Kok, E., Kleter, G. et al. EU court casts new plant breeding techniques into regulatory limbo. Nat Biotechnol 36, 799–800 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading