Greater safeguards are needed to address the personal safety, security and privacy risks arising from increasing adoption of neurotechnology in the consumer realm.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Impact of neural cyberattacks on a realistic neuronal topology from the primary visual cortex of mice
Wireless Networks Open Access 25 January 2024
-
Neuroadaptive Technology and the Self: a Postphenomenological Perspective
Philosophy & Technology Open Access 26 April 2023
-
How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation
Science and Engineering Ethics Open Access 02 February 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Fernandez A., Sriraman, N., Gurewitz, B. & Oullier, O. Market Report on Pervasive Neurotechnology: A Groundbreaking Analysis of 10,000+ Patent Filings Transforming Medicine, Health, Entertainment and Business. (SharpBrains, San Francisco, USA, 2017). https://doi.org/sharpbrains.com/pervasive-neurotechnology/.
Martinovic, I. et al. in USENIX Security Symposium 143–158 (2012). https://doi.org/www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity12/technical-sessions/presentation/martinovic.
Bonaci, T. in USENIX Enigma (Oakland, CA; 2017). https://doi.org/www.usenix.org/conference/enigma2017
Davis, N.J. & van Koningsbruggen, M.G. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7, 76 (2013).
Medina, J. & Cason, S. Cortex 94, 131–141 (2017).
Mecacci, G. & Haselager, P. Sci. Eng. Ethics, (in press).
Nishimoto, S. et al. Curr. Biol. 21, 1641–1646 (2011).
Boto, E. et al. Nature 555, 657–661 (2018).
Charo, R.A. Science 349, 384–385 (2015).
Anon. Symantec. Internet security threat report. (April 21, 2016). https://doi.org/www.symantec.com/content/dam/symantec/docs/reports/istr-21-2016-en.pdf
Green, R.M. Hastings Cent. Rep. 45, 36–37 (2015).
Eaton, M.L. & Illes, J. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 393–397 (2007).
Ienca, M. & Haselager, P. Ethics Inf. Technol. 18, 117–129 (2016).
Mobasheri, M.H. et al. BMJ Innov. 1, 174–181 (2015).
Sharp, R. Lacking regulation, many medical apps questionable at best. New England Center for Investigative Reporting 18 (2012). https://doi.org/necir.org/2012/11/18/medical-apps
Farah, M.J. & Wolpe, P.R. Hastings Cent. Rep. 34, 35–45 (2004).
Moreno, J.D. Mind Wars: Brain Science and the Military in the Twenty-First Century (Bellevue Literary Press, 2012).
Ienca, M., Jotterand, F. & Elger, B.S. Neuron 97, 269–274 (2018).
Farahany, N.A. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 160, 1239–1308 (2012).
US Department of Health and Human Services. Summary of the HIPAA privacy rule. (Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 2003).
Food & Drug Administration. Mobile medical applications: guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. (Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, 2013).
Steinhubl, S.R., Muse, E.D. & Topol, E.J. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 283 (2015).
National Institutes of Health. NIH Request for Information (RFI): Guidance for Opportunities in Neuroethics. NIH BRAIN Initiative (2016) https://doi.org/grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-MH-16-014.html.
Obar, J.A. & Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. The Biggest Lie on the Internet: Ignoring the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service Policies of Social Networking Services. in The 44th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (2016). https://doi.org/ssrn.com/abstract=2757465.
Bonaci, T., Herron, J., Matlack, C. & Chizeck, H.J. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 34, 44–51 (2015).
Bonaci, T., Calo, R. & Chizeck, H.J. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 34, 32–39 (2015).
Baker, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 377–379 (2007).
Stopczynski A, Stahlhut C, Larsen JE, Petersen MK, Hansen LK. PLoS One 9, e86733 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (KZS 20/17).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ienca, M., Haselager, P. & Emanuel, E. Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 36, 805–810 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4240
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4240
This article is cited by
-
Harmful uses of patentable neurotechnology: a new regulatory approach
EMBO Reports (2024)
-
Impact of neural cyberattacks on a realistic neuronal topology from the primary visual cortex of mice
Wireless Networks (2024)
-
Rationales and Approaches to Protecting Brain Data: a Scoping Review
Neuroethics (2024)
-
Advocating for neurodata privacy and neurotechnology regulation
Nature Protocols (2023)
-
How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation
Science and Engineering Ethics (2023)