Commentary | Published:

Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology

Nature Biotechnology volume 36, pages 805810 (2018) | Download Citation

Greater safeguards are needed to address the personal safety, security and privacy risks arising from increasing adoption of neurotechnology in the consumer realm.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Market Report on Pervasive Neurotechnology: A Groundbreaking Analysis of 10,000+ Patent Filings Transforming Medicine, Health, Entertainment and Business. (SharpBrains, San Francisco, USA, 2017). .

  2. 2.

    et al. in USENIX Security Symposium 143–158 (2012). .

  3. 3.

    in USENIX Enigma (Oakland, CA; 2017).

  4. 4.

    & Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7, 76 (2013).

  5. 5.

    & Cortex 94, 131–141 (2017).

  6. 6.

    & Sci. Eng. Ethics, (in press).

  7. 7.

    et al. Curr. Biol. 21, 1641–1646 (2011).

  8. 8.

    et al. Nature 555, 657–661 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Science 349, 384–385 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Anon. Symantec. Internet security threat report. (April 21, 2016).

  11. 11.

    Hastings Cent. Rep. 45, 36–37 (2015).

  12. 12.

    & Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 393–397 (2007).

  13. 13.

    & Ethics Inf. Technol. 18, 117–129 (2016).

  14. 14.

    et al. BMJ Innov. 1, 174–181 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Lacking regulation, many medical apps questionable at best. New England Center for Investigative Reporting 18 (2012).

  16. 16.

    & Hastings Cent. Rep. 34, 35–45 (2004).

  17. 17.

    Mind Wars: Brain Science and the Military in the Twenty-First Century (Bellevue Literary Press, 2012).

  18. 18.

    , & Neuron 97, 269–274 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 160, 1239–1308 (2012).

  20. 20.

    US Department of Health and Human Services. Summary of the HIPAA privacy rule. (Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 2003).

  21. 21.

    Food & Drug Administration. Mobile medical applications: guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. (Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, 2013).

  22. 22.

    , & Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 283 (2015).

  23. 23.

    National Institutes of Health. NIH Request for Information (RFI): Guidance for Opportunities in Neuroethics. NIH BRAIN Initiative (2016) .

  24. 24.

    & The Biggest Lie on the Internet: Ignoring the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service Policies of Social Networking Services. in The 44th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (2016). .

  25. 25.

    , , & IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 34, 44–51 (2015).

  26. 26.

    , & IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 34, 32–39 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 377–379 (2007).

  28. 28.

    , , , , PLoS One 9, e86733 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (KZS 20/17).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Marcello Ienca is at the Health Ethics & Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; and at the Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    • Marcello Ienca
  2. Pim Haselager is at the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

    • Pim Haselager
  3. Ezekiel J. Emanuel is at the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

    • Ezekiel J Emanuel

Authors

  1. Search for Marcello Ienca in:

  2. Search for Pim Haselager in:

  3. Search for Ezekiel J Emanuel in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Ienca.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4240

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing