Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Making the right calls in precision oncology

Expert curation at present remains the only reliable solution for interpretation of mutation information in the clinical practice of oncology.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The typical workflow of precision data processing.
Figure 2: Number of unique variants in selected biomarkers curated for NSCLC patients by N-of-One, as of November 14, 2017.
Figure 3: Three primary approaches are being taken to scale and interpret the vast amount of tumor genetic data generated: crowdsourcing, AI, and expert curation.

References

  1. 1

    Hyman, D.M., Taylor, B.S. & Baselga, J. Cell 168, 584–599 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Stover, D.G. & Wagle, N. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 17, 15 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Butler, T., Maravent, S., Boisselle, J., Valdes, J. & Fellner, C. P&T 40, 191–205 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Heymach, J. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 1020–1044 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Aitken, M., Kleinrock, M. & Kumar, S. Global Oncology Trends 2017. (IQVIA, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Sawyers, C. Nature 432, 294–297 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Trøst Jørgensen, J. & Hersom, M. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 103, 999–1008 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Nebot-Bral, L. et al. Eur. J. Cancer 84, 290–303 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Maley, C.C. et al. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 605–619 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Overman, M.J. et al. Lancet Oncol. 18, 1182–1191 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Chow, L.Q.M. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3838–3845 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Moore, T.J. & Furberg, C.D. JAMA Intern. Med. 174, 90–95 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Alper, B.S. et al. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 92, 429–437 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Singhal, A. et al. Database (Oxford) 2016, baw161 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Hirschman, L. et al. Database (Oxford) 2016, baw115 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Khare, R., Good, B.M., Leaman, R., Su, A.I. & Lu, Z. Brief. Bioinform. 17, 23–32, (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Burger, J.D. et al. Database (Oxford) 2014, bau094 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Dewdney, S.B. & Lachance, J. Front. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00268 (2017).

  19. 19

    Chakravarty, D. et al. JCO Precis. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.17.00011 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Griffith, M. et al. Nat. Genet. 49, 170–174 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Jensen, M.A., Ferretti, V., Grossman, R.L. & Staudt, L.M. Blood https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-03-735654 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Bohannon, J. Science 349, 252 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Guizzo, E. IEEE Spectrum (17 February, 2011).

  24. 24

    Johnston, C. ars Technica (16 February 2011).

  25. 25

    Castillo, M. Time (16 February 2011).

  26. 26

    Somashekhar, S. et al. Cancer Res. 77, Suppl. S6–S7 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Somashekhar, S.P. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, abstr 8527 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Kourou, K., Exarchos, T.P., Exarchos, K.P., Karamouzis, M.V. & Fotiadis, D.I. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13, 8–17 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Koyama, T. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, Abstract e12549 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Wrzeszczynski, K.O. et al. Neurol. Genet. 3, e164 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Ross, C. & Swetlitz, I. Stat News (5 September 2017).

  32. 32

    Freedman, D.H. MIT Technol. Rev. (27 June 2017).

  33. 33

    Cabitza, F., Rasoini, R. & Gensini, G.F. JAMA 318, 517–518 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Voosen, P. Science 357, 22–27 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Long, G.V. et al. Nat. Commun. 5, 5694 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Kerr, I.D. et al. J. Community Genet. 8, 87–95 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Li, M.M. et al. J. Mol. Diagn. 19, 4–23 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Blay, J.Y., Brahmi, M. & Ray-Coquard, I. Eur. J. Cancer 70, 83–86 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Sharma, P., Hu-Lieskovan, S., Wargo, J.A. & Ribas, A. Cell 168, 707–723 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Moran, S., Martinez-Cardús, A., Boussios, S. & Esteller, M. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14, 682–694. (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Wong, C.C., Qian, Y. & Yu, J. Oncogene 36, 3359–3374 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Widschwendter, M. et al. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 292–309 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristen Lalowski.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

K.D.B., K.L., and S.K.E. are employees of N-of-One.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bungartz, K., Lalowski, K. & Elkin, S. Making the right calls in precision oncology. Nat Biotechnol 36, 692–696 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4214

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing