Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Managing disputes in the life sciences

Life sciences company decision-makers can effectively manage disputes using appropriate dispute resolution techniques without resorting to expensive, complex, and uncertain litigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Langbein, J.H. Yale Law J. 122, 522–572 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Middlemiss, S. & Balfour, L. Patent litigation in the Unified Patent Court: overview. Thomson Reuters Practical Law (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elmer, M.C. & Gramenopoulos, C.G. Global Patent Litigation: How and Where to Win, 2nd Ed. (Bloomberg BNA, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barry, C., Arad, R., Ansell, L., Cartier, M. & Lee, H. 2016 Patent Litigation Study (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cremers, K. et al. Eur. J. Law Econ. 44, 1–44 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Trade Organization. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Art. 32 (WTO, April 15, 1994).

  7. Mabuchi Motor KK's Patents v. Johnson Electric R.P.C. 5 (1996).

  8. Document Security System, Inc. v. European Central Bank Case T-295/05 (2005).

  9. Novartis v. Johnson & Johnson EWCA Civ. 1039 (2010).

  10. AGA Medical Corp. v Occlutech Case No. X ZR 16/09 (2010–11).

  11. Hatter, J.P., Jr. Indiana Int. Comp. Law Rev. 5, 461 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Directive 2004/48/EC, the Directive on the enforcement of IPRs, known as the Harmonisation Directive.

  13. Gilbert, P. et al. The Unified Patent Court and the Unitary Patent: latest developments. Thomson Reuters Practical Law (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abbott, R. Whittier Law Rev. 35, 341–348 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riskin, L.L. Notre Dame Law Rev. 79, 1–53 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schonewille, M. & Lack, J. in The Variegated Landscape of Mediation: a Comparative Study of Mediation Regulation and Practices in Europe and the World (Schonewille, M. & Schonewille, F., eds.) 14–44 (Eleven International Publishing, The Netherlands, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lack, J. in Business, Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures (Ingen-Housz, A., ed.) 339–379 (Kluwer Law International, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lurie, P.M. & Lack, J. Dispute Resolution Int. 8, 167–177 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lurie, P.M. & Lack, J. The seven principles of guided choice dispute resolution processes. Who's Who Legal (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See

  21. American Arbitration Association ICDR. B2B Dispute Resolution Impact Report. 2015 Key Statistics. (2015).

  22. International Chamber of Commerce. 2016 ICC Dispute Resolution Statistics (2017).

  23. Law no. 62/2011 of 12 December 2011.

  24. The Global Pound Conference. Cumulated Data Results March 2016–September 2017 (International Mediation Institute, 2017).

  25. See

  26. See

  27. Lack, J. The growing need for ADR in IP disputes. Intellect. Property 19–22 (December 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958).

  29. Stipanowich, T.J. & Lamare, J.R. Harv. Negot. Law Rev. 19, 1–68 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alexander, N. A convention on the enforcement of iMSAs...and a new model law. Kluwer Mediation Blog (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Folberg, J. & Taylor, A. Mediation: a Comprehensive Guide to Resolving Conflicts without Litigation (Jossey-Bass, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sherkow, J.S. & Abbott, R. Br. Med. Bull. 126, 37–45 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Abbott.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors are all panelists on the World Intellectual Property Organization's List of Mediators and Arbitrators, in addition to other national and international dispute resolution services providers, specializing in intellectual property and technology-based disputes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbott, R., Lack, J. & Perkins, D. Managing disputes in the life sciences. Nat Biotechnol 36, 697–700 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing