Correspondence | Published:

The European Union Court's Advocate General's Opinion and new plant breeding techniques

Nature Biotechnology volume 36, pages 573575 (2018) | Download Citation

Subjects

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Viruses 7, 4254–4281 (2015).

  2. 2.

    & Plant J. 78, 742–752 (2014).

  3. 3.

    , , & Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 11, 1–8 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Commission expects clarity on GM scope from court ruling on plant breeding techniques. (EURACTIV, 19 January 2018). (accessed 21 March 2018).

  5. 5.

    EUR-Lex. EU Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Official Journal L 106, 17/04/2001, 0001–0039, 2018). (accessed 1 February 2018).

  6. 6.

    New plant-breeding techniques. Applicability of GM rules. (European Parliamentary Research Service, European Union, 2016). (accessed March 21, 2018).

  7. 7.

    EUR-Lex. Opinion of Advocate General Bobek, provisional text. (InfoCuria, 18 January 2018). (delivered on 18 January 2018).

  8. 8.

    EUR-Lex. Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Official Journal L 268, 18/10/2003, 0001–0023). (accessed 12 February 2018).

  9. 9.

    , & Cambridge J. Comp. Int. Law 5, 82–112 (2016).

  10. 10.

    & GM Crops Food 6, 253–265 (2015).

  11. 11.

    EC. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Transparency and Sustainability of the EU Risk Assessment in the Food Chain (European Commission, 2018).

  12. 12.

    BVL. Opinion on the Legal Classification of New Plant Breeding Techniques, in Particular ODM and CRISPR-Cas9 (German Federal Ministry for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin; 2017).

  13. 13.

    in Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation (eds. Purnhagen, K. & Rott, P.) 315–342 (Springer, New York; 2014)

  14. 14.

    , & AJAE 88, 1193–1199 (2006).

  15. 15.

    , & GJAE 64, 244–262 (2015).

  16. 16.

    et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 18–19 (2018).

  17. 17.

    & Kyklos 61, 447–465 (2008).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Law and Governance Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    • Kai P Purnhagen
    •  & Hanna Schebesta
  2. RIKILT Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    • Esther Kok
    •  & Gijs Kleter
  3. Plant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    • Richard G F Visser
  4. Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    • Justus Wesseler

Authors

  1. Search for Kai P Purnhagen in:

  2. Search for Esther Kok in:

  3. Search for Gijs Kleter in:

  4. Search for Hanna Schebesta in:

  5. Search for Richard G F Visser in:

  6. Search for Justus Wesseler in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai P Purnhagen.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4174

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing