Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The European Union Court's Advocate General's Opinion and new plant breeding techniques


Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Lucht, J.M. Viruses 7, 4254–4281 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Hartung, F. & Schiemann, J. Plant J. 78, 742–752 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    van de Wiel, C.C.M., Schaart, J.G., Lotz, L.A.P. & Smulders, M.J.M. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 11, 1–8 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Michalopoulos, S. Commission expects clarity on GM scope from court ruling on plant breeding techniques. (EURACTIV, 19 January 2018). (accessed 21 March 2018).

  5. 5

    EUR-Lex. EU Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Official Journal L 106, 17/04/2001, 0001–0039, 2018). (accessed 1 February 2018).

  6. 6

    Laaninen, T. New plant-breeding techniques. Applicability of GM rules. (European Parliamentary Research Service, European Union, 2016). (accessed March 21, 2018).

  7. 7

    EUR-Lex. Opinion of Advocate General Bobek, provisional text. (InfoCuria, 18 January 2018). (delivered on 18 January 2018).

  8. 8

    EUR-Lex. Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Official Journal L 268, 18/10/2003, 0001–0023). (accessed 12 February 2018).

  9. 9

    Arrebola, C., Maurício, A.J. & Portilla, H.J. Cambridge J. Comp. Int. Law 5, 82–112 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Whelan, A.I. & Lema, M.A. GM Crops Food 6, 253–265 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    EC. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Transparency and Sustainability of the EU Risk Assessment in the Food Chain (European Commission, 2018).

  12. 12

    BVL. Opinion on the Legal Classification of New Plant Breeding Techniques, in Particular ODM and CRISPR-Cas9 (German Federal Ministry for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin; 2017).

  13. 13

    Purnhagen, K. in Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation (eds. Purnhagen, K. & Rott, P.) 315–342 (Springer, New York; 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Beckmann, V., Soregaroli, C. & Wesseler, J. AJAE 88, 1193–1199 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Smart, R., Blum, M. & Wesseler, J. GJAE 64, 244–262 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Eriksson, D. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 18–19 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Kerber, W. & van den Bergh, R. Kyklos 61, 447–465 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai P Purnhagen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Purnhagen, K., Kok, E., Kleter, G. et al. The European Union Court's Advocate General's Opinion and new plant breeding techniques. Nat Biotechnol 36, 573–575 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing