Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Rationalizing governance of genetically modified products in developing countries

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. International Symposium on the role of agricultural biotechnologies in sustainable food systems and nutrition (Rome) (2016).

  2. Adenle, A.A. et al. (eds.) Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing Countries. Risk Analysis and Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2017).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Statistical Yearbook Part 4, 312–352 (FAO, Rome 2012). (2012).

  4. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. (2016).

  5. Andrzejczak, K. in Economic Integrations Competition and Cooperation (eds. Kandzija, V. & Kumar A.) 777–796 (CEMAFI International, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISAAA. Crop Biotech Update (2017).

  7. Adenle, A.A. et al. Food Policy 43, 159–166 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramessar, K., Capell, T., Twyman, R.M., Quemada, H. & Christou, P. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 975–978 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston, S. et al. Internationally Funded Training in Biotechnology and Biosafety: Is it Bridging the Biotech Divide? (Yokohama: United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abbott, A. Nature 528, 319–320 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016).

  12. United Kingdom House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee. Advanced Genetic Techniques for Crop Improvement: Regulation, Risk and Precaution. Fifth Report of Session 2014–15 (2015).

  13. Atanassov, A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 551–552 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brandolini, G.V. Terminal Evaluation Report: Support for Implementation of the National Biosafety Framework for Mauritius (GFL-2328–2716–4952). Prepared for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya (UNEP, Paris, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The themes discussed here are based on those presented in reference 2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ademola A Adenle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adenle, A., Morris, E., Murphy, D. et al. Rationalizing governance of genetically modified products in developing countries. Nat Biotechnol 36, 137–139 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research