Revisiting the Warnock rule

An Erratum to this article was published on 08 December 2017

This article has been updated

Is it time to reassess the 14-day rule for human embryo research?

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 10 November 2017

    In the version of this article initially published, J.E. Lunshof's affiliation was given as “Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA”; the affiliation should have included her main affiliation at the University of Groningen and read, “Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands, and Department of Genetics, Church laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.” In addition, “Divinity School, University of Chicago,” should be “University of Chicago Divinity School.” The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. 1

    Warnock, M. et al. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, UK, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Shahbazi, M.N. Self-organization of the human embryo in the absence of maternal tissues. Nat. Cell. Biol. 18, 700–708 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Deglincerti, A. et al. Self-organization of the in vitro attached human embryo. Nature 533, 251–254 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Bedzhov, I. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Self-organizing properties of mouse pluripotent cells initiate morphogenesis upon implantation. Cell 156, 1032–1044 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Bedzhov, I., Leung, C.Y., Bialecka, M. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. In vitro culture of mouse blastocysts beyond the implantation stages. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2732–2739 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Partridge, E. et al. An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb. Nat. Commun. 8, 15112 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Human Embryo Culture http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Human-Embryo-Culture-web-FINAL.pdf (Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2017).

  8. 8

    Harrison, S.E., Sozen, B., Christodoulou, N., Kyprianou, C. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Assembly of embryonic and extraembryonic stem cells to mimic embryogenesis in vitro. Science 356, https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1810 (2017).

  9. 9

    Hammond-Browning, N. Ethics, embryos, and evidence: a look back at Warnock. Med. Law Rev. 23, 588–619 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Cavaliere, G. A 14-limit for bioethics: the debate over human embryo research. BMC Med. Eth. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0198-5 (2017).

  11. 11

    Warnock, M. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology. Milbank Mem. Fund Q. Health Soc. 63, 504–522 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurlbut, J., Hyun, I., Levine, A. et al. Revisiting the Warnock rule. Nat Biotechnol 35, 1029–1042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4015

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing