Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News Feature
  • Published:

Better beings?

As the technology to create genetically modified babies moves closer to practice, what questions should we ask before such procedures are contemplated? Amber Dance investigates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A patchwork of laws and regulations for germline modification.

© iStockphoto

Figure 2: Acceptance of genome engineering.

References

  1. Ma, H. et al. Nature 548, 413–419 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Geurts, A.M. et al. Science 325, 433 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyce, N. Nature 414, 677 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liang, P. et al. Protein Cell 6, 363–372 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang, X. et al. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 33, 581–588 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang, L. et al. Mol. Genet. Genomics 292, 525–533 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fogarty, N.M.E., et al. Nature 550, 67–73 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Egli, D. et al. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/08/28/181255 (2017).

  9. Scott, D.A. & Zhang, F. Nat. Med. 23, 1095–1101 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lek, M. et al. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).

  12. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. International Summit on Human Gene Editing: A Global Discussion (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2015).

  13. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2017).

  14. Ormond, K.E., et al. Amer. J. Human Genet. 101, 167–176 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lanphier, E., et al. Nature 519, 410–411 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Egan, J.F.X. et al. Prenat. Diagn. 31, 389–394 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Graaf, G. et al. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38402 (2017).

  18. Albrecht, G.L. & Devlieger, P.J. Soc. Sci. Med. 48, 977–88 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheufele, D.A., et al. Science 357, 553–554 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cyranoski, D. Nature 548, 272–274 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishii, T., Brief Funct. Genomics 16, 46–56 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Konig, H., Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 502–506 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lander, E.S. N. Eng. J. Med. 373, 5–8 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jonsson, T. Nature 488, 96–99 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mercader, J.M. et al. Diabetes https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db17-0187 (2017).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dance, A. Better beings?. Nat Biotechnol 35, 1006–1011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3998

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3998

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing