Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ethical lessons from a tale of two genetically modified insects


Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Annotated timeline of proposed A. aegypti field trial.
Figure 2: Annotated timeline of proposed field trial of the moth Plutella xylostella.


  1. 1

    Winskill, P. et al. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0004156 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Oye, K.A. et al. Science 345, 626–628 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Resnik, D.B. Dev.World Bioeth. 14, 37–46 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Caplan, A.L. et al. EMBO Rep. e201541337 (2015).

  5. 5

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2016).

  6. 6

    World Health Organization/Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health. The Guidance Framework for Testing Genetically Modified Mosquitoes (WHO/TDR, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014)

  7. 7

    World Health Organization. Situation Report: Zika Virus, Microcephaly, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (20 January 2017).

  8. 8

    Zalucki, M.P. et al. J. Econ. Entomol. 105, 1115–1129 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Lopez, W. & Miller, J.R. J. Law Med. Ethics 30 Suppl, 135–138 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Murphy, E.A., Post, G.B., Buckley, B.T., Lippincott, R.L. & Robson, M.G. Annu. Rev. Public Health 33, 209–224 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Fernandez-Cornejo, J. et al. Pesticide Use in US Agriculture: 21 Selected Crops, 1960–2008 (USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, 2014).

  12. 12

    Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. Sci. Technol. Human Values 30, 251–290 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Enserink, M. Science 330, 1030–1031 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Subbaraman, N. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 9–11 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Florida Keys Mosquito Control District. Latest Information on the proposed Oxitec GM Mosquito Project.

  16. 16

    Shaw, D. Finger Lakes Times (1 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Biotechnology Regulatory Services. National Environmental Policy Act Decision and Finding of No Significant Impact (USDA, Washington, DC, 2014).

  18. 18

    Greenberg, M. et al. Risk Anal. 35, 1959–1968 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Van den Brink, P.J. et al. Mar. Freshw. Res. 67, 429–439 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Adalja, A. et al. PLoS Curr. (2016).

  21. 21

    Hatfield, K. GEN: Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News (13 June 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Quinn, S.C. Am. J. Public Health 94, 918–922 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Cohen, J. in Political Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century (eds. Cahn, S.M. & Talisse, R.B.) 217–235 (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn P Neuhaus.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neuhaus, C., Caplan, A. Ethical lessons from a tale of two genetically modified insects. Nat Biotechnol 35, 713–716 (2017).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing