Chinese patent law may not be equipped to deal with the potential moral issues raised by gene-editing technology.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$259.00
only $21.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1
Webber, P. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 331–333 (2014).
- 2
Bosley, K.S. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 478–486 (2015).
- 3
Garneau, J.E. et al. Nature 468, 67–71 (2010).
- 4
Deltcheva, E. et al. Nature 471, 602–607 (2011).
- 5
Sapranauskas, R. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 9275–9282 (2011).
- 6
Jinek, M. et al. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
- 7
Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P. & Siksnys, V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2579–E2586 (2012).
- 8
Cong, L. et al. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
- 9
Mali, P. et al. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).
- 10
Liang, P. et al. Protein Cell 6, 363–372 (2015).
- 11
State Intellectual Property Office PRC. in Guidelines for Patent Examination Part II, Ch. 10, 9 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2010).
- 12
May, A.P. et al. US Patent No. 9,260,752 (2016).
- 13
Zhang, F. US Patent No. 8,697,359 (2014).
- 14
SIPO patent database search for patent applications and patents containing the term “CRISPR/Cas9” in the title and first pages (searched on 21 June 2015). http://www.pss-system.gov.cn/sipopublicsearch/portal/index.shtml
- 15
Zhang, Q. Strategy and Practice of Intellectual Property in the Fields of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology p.61 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2008).
- 16
Patent Law of the People's Republic of China, Article 25, Paragraph 2.
- 17
Patent Law of the People's Republic of China, Article 11, Paragraph 1.
- 18
Suzhou Tongshan Bio-Tech Co. Ltd. Chinese Patent application No. 201310610085.0 (2014).
- 19
Patent Law of the People's Republic of China, Article 5, Paragraph 1.
- 20
European Patent Office. European Patent Convention, 15th edn. (EPO, 2013).
- 21
European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of July 6, 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions (6 July 1998).
- 22
State Intellectual Property Office PRC. in Guidelines for Patent Examination Part II, Ch. 1, 3.1.1, paragraph 1 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2010).
- 23
Zhang, Q. Strategy and Practice of Intellectual Property in the Fields of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology p.26 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2008).
- 24
Legal Affairs Department of the State Intellectual Property Office PRC. Explication to the Newly-adapted Patent Law p.26 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2001).
- 25
State Intellectual Property Office PRC. in Guidelines for Patent Examination Part II, Ch. 1, 3.1.2, paragraph 1 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2010).
- 26
State Intellectual Property Office PRC. in Guidelines for Patent Examination Part II, Ch. 1, 3.1.2, paragraph 2 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2010).
- 27
Chen, X. Statement by the Representative of the People's Republic of China Mr. Chen Xu at the Ad Hoc Committee on the Convention Against the Reproductive Cloning of Human Beings http://www.china-un.org/eng/zghlhg/flsw/t28563.htm (26 February 2002).
- 28
State Intellectual Property Office PRC. in Guidelines for Patent Examination Part II, Ch. 10, 9.1.1.2 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2010).
- 29
State Intellectual Property Office PRC. in Guidelines for Patent Examination Part II, Ch. 1, 3.1.3 (Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2010).
- 30
Li, W. & Cai, L. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1001–1003 (2014).
- 31
World Intellectual Property Organization. in WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use Ch. 2, 17 http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/about-ip/en/iprm/pdf/ch2.pdf (WIPO, 2004).
- 32
Ministry of Science and Technology and Ministry of Health of the PRC. Ethical Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research http://www.most.gov.cn/fggw/zfwj/zfwj2003/200512/t20051214_54948.htm (MOST, 2003).
- 33
Ministry of Health of the PRC. Measures for the Ethical Review of Biomedical Research Involving the Human Body (for Trial Implementation) http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/mohbgt/pw10702/200804/18816.shtml (MOH, 2007).
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Table
Supplementary Table 1 (XLSX 34 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, Y. The morality and ethics governing CRISPR–Cas9 patents in China. Nat Biotechnol 34, 616–618 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3590
Published:
Issue Date:
Further reading
-
Moving genome edited crops forward from the laboratory bench to the kitchen table
Food Control (2021)
-
The application of the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing machinery in food and agricultural science: Current status, future perspectives, and associated challenges
Biotechnology Advances (2019)
-
Immunity to CRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a therapeutics
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine (2018)
-
The commercialization of genome-editing technologies
Critical Reviews in Biotechnology (2017)
-
Les débuts de CRISPR en thérapie génique
médecine/sciences (2016)