Article | Published:

Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data

Nature Biotechnology volume 34, pages 637645 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Recent single-cell analysis technologies offer an unprecedented opportunity to elucidate developmental pathways. Here we present Wishbone, an algorithm for positioning single cells along bifurcating developmental trajectories with high resolution. Wishbone uses multi-dimensional single-cell data, such as mass cytometry or RNA-Seq data, as input and orders cells according to their developmental progression, and it pinpoints bifurcation points by labeling each cell as pre-bifurcation or as one of two post-bifurcation cell fates. Using 30-channel mass cytometry data, we show that Wishbone accurately recovers the known stages of T-cell development in the mouse thymus, including the bifurcation point. We also apply the algorithm to mouse myeloid differentiation and demonstrate its generalization to additional lineages. A comparison of Wishbone to diffusion maps, SCUBA and Monocle shows that it outperforms these methods both in the accuracy of ordering cells and in the correct identification of branch points.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. 1.

    et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).

  2. 2.

    et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 332, 687–696 (2011).

  3. 3.

    et al. Single-cell trajectory detection uncovers progression and regulatory coordination in human B cell development. Cell 157, 714–725 (2014).

  4. 4.

    et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq with waterfall reveals molecular cascades underlying adult neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 17, 360–372 (2015).

  5. 5.

    et al. Bifurcation analysis of single-cell gene expression data reveals epigenetic landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5643–E5650 (2014).

  6. 6.

    et al. Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors. Cell 163, 1663–1677 (2015).

  7. 7.

    et al. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: diffusion maps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7426–7431 (2005).

  8. 8.

    & Mechanisms of T cell development and transformation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 539–562 (2011).

  9. 9.

    & Developmental gene networks: a triathlon on the course to T cell identity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 529–545 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Regulation of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor expression and CD4 versus CD8 lineage decisions. Adv. Immunol. 125, 1–40 (2015).

  11. 11.

    et al. Distinct functions for the transcription factors GATA-3 and ThPOK during intrathymic differentiation of CD4(+) T cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1122–1130 (2008).

  12. 12.

    & Signal integration and crosstalk during thymocyte migration and emigration. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 469–477 (2011).

  13. 13.

    et al. The transcriptional landscape of αβ T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 14, 619–632 (2013).

  14. 14.

    , , & CD69 cell surface expression identifies developing thymocytes which audition for T cell antigen receptor-mediated positive selection. Int. Immunol. 5, 1139–1150 (1993).

  15. 15.

    , & Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 788–801 (2008).

  16. 16.

    & The Immunological Genome Project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1091–1094 (2008).

  17. 17.

    & Transcription factors in myeloid development: balancing differentiation with transformation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 105–117 (2007).

  18. 18.

    et al. Revised map of the human progenitor hierarchy shows the origin of macrophages and dendritic cells in early lymphoid development. Nat. Immunol. 11, 585–593 (2010).

  19. 19.

    et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).

  20. 20.

    et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

  21. 21.

    et al. Computational analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-Sequencing data reveals hidden subpopulations of cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 155–160 (2015).

  22. 22.

    & Myeloperoxidase: a specific marker for myeloid cells in paraffin sections. Mod. Pathol. 4, 733–741 (1991).

  23. 23.

    , & GATA factor switching during erythroid differentiation. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 17, 163–168 (2010).

  24. 24.

    et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014).

  25. 25.

    , & Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data. Bioinformatics 31, 2989–2998 (2015).

  26. 26.

    et al. Decoding the regulatory network of early blood development from single-cell gene expression measurements. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 269–276 (2015).

  27. 27.

    , & Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 133–145 (2015).

  28. 28.

    et al. Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis. Cell 162, 184–197 (2015).

  29. 29.

    An Introduction to Modern Genetics (George Allen & Unwin, 1939).

  30. 30.

    et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).

  31. 31.

    & Global versus local methods in nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15, 721–728 (2003).

  32. 32.

    et al. viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 545–552 (2013).

  33. 33.

    , , , & Trajectories of cell-cycle progression from fixed cell populations. Nat. Methods 12, 951–954 (2015).

  34. 34.

    A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat. Comput. 17, 395–416 (2007).

  35. 35.

    , , & affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20, 307–315 (2004).

  36. 36.

    et al. Single-cell messenger RNA sequencing reveals rare intestinal cell types. Nature 525, 251–255 (2015).

  37. 37.

    , & Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank A. Bloemendal, Z. Good, N. Hacohen, S. Krishnaswamy, J. Levine and A.J. Carr for their helpful comments. M.D.T. is supported by an NSF graduate fellowship. This work was supported by NSF MCB-1149728, NIH DP1- HD084071, NIH R01CA164729 to D.P. D.P. holds a Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering. This work was also supported by David and Fela Shapell Family Foundation INCPM Fund, the WIS staff scientists grant from the Nissim Center, for the Development of Scientific Resources, and ISF 1184/15 to N.F.

Author information

Author notes

    • Manu Setty
    •  & Michelle D Tadmor

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

    • Manu Setty
    • , Michelle D Tadmor
    • , Pooja Kathail
    • , Kristy Choi
    •  & Dana Pe'er
  2. Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

    • Shlomit Reich-Zeliger
    •  & Nir Friedman
  3. Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

    • Omer Angel
  4. Biological Services Unit, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

    • Tomer Meir Salame
  5. Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

    • Sean Bendall

Authors

  1. Search for Manu Setty in:

  2. Search for Michelle D Tadmor in:

  3. Search for Shlomit Reich-Zeliger in:

  4. Search for Omer Angel in:

  5. Search for Tomer Meir Salame in:

  6. Search for Pooja Kathail in:

  7. Search for Kristy Choi in:

  8. Search for Sean Bendall in:

  9. Search for Nir Friedman in:

  10. Search for Dana Pe'er in:

Contributions

S.B. and D.P. conceived the study. M.S., M.D.T., O.A., and D.P. designed and developed Wishbone. M.S. and D.P. performed statistical analysis and comparison of Wishbone. S.R.-Z., T.M.S., and N.F. performed all bench experiments and data acquisition. M.S., S.R.-Z., N.F., and D.P. performed the biological analysis and interpretation. M.D.T., M.S., P.K., and K.C. programmed the software tools. M.S., S.R.-Z., N.F., and D.P. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana Pe'er.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figure 1–25 and Supplementary Notes 1–4

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

Zip files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Software

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3569

Further reading