Current regulatory regimes for genetically engineered crops fail to use a scientifically defensible approach or tailor the degree of regulatory review to the level of actual hazard or risk. We describe a rational way forward.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
National Research Council (NRC). Field Testing Genetically Modified Organisms: Framework for Decisions (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1989).
Barton, J., Crandon, J., Kennedy, D. & Miller, H. A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions. Nat. Biotechnol. 15, 845–848 (1997).
James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49 (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA), Ithaca, New York, USA, 2015)
Ricroch, A. & Hénard-Damave, M.-C. Next biotech plants: new traits, crops, developers and technologies for addressing global challenges. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 10.3109/07388551.2015.1004521 (2015).
Jones, W. in GMO Answers Blog https://gmoanswers.com/experts/wendelyn-jones (9 January 2015), accessed 26 February 2016.
UNIDO/UNEP/WHO/FAO. Section II–C-1, General Principles. in Voluntary Code of Conduct for the Release of Organisms into the Environment (1991).
WHO/FAO. Codex Alimentarius, Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology edn. 2 (CAC/GL 44–2003).
NRC. Introduction of Recombinant DNA-Engineered Organisms into the Environment: Key Issues (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1987).
OSTP. Exercise of federal oversight within scope of statutory authority: planned introductions of biotechnology products into the environment; Announcement of policy. Fed. Regist. 57, 6753–6762 (1992).
United Kingdom Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (ACRE). Towards an evidence-based regulatory system for GMOs http://www.defra.gov.uk/acre/files/Report-1.pdf (2013).
ACRE. Why a modern understanding of genomes demonstrates the need for a new regulatory system for GMOs. http://www.defra.gov.uk/acre/files/Report-2.pdf (2013).
ACRE. Towards a more effective approach to environmental risk assessment of GM crops under current EU legislation http://www.defra.gov.uk/acre/files/Report-3.pdf (2013).
Schnell, J. et al. A comparative analysis of insertional effects in genetically engineered plants: considerations for pre-market assessments. Transgenic Res. 24, 1–17 (2015).
Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F. & Rosellini, D. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 34, 77–88 (2014).
European Union. EUR 24473: A Decade of EU-Funded GMO Research 2001–2010 (Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2010).
Van Eenennaam, A.L. & Young, A.E. Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 4255–4278 (2014).
OSTP. Improving transparency and ensuring continued safety in biotechnology. White House blog (2 July 2015).
Matsuoka, Y. Evolution of polyploid triticum wheats under cultivation: the role of domestication, natural hybridization and allopolyploid speciation in their diversification. Plant Cell Physiol. 52, 750–764 (2011).
Hancock, J. Plant Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species (CABI Publishing, 2004).
Jones, S.S., Murray, T.D. & Allan, R.E. The use of alien genes for development of disease resistance in wheat. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 33, 429–443 (1995).
Ahloowalia, B.S., Maluszynski, M. & Nichterlein, K. Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135, 187–204 (2004).
IAEA/MVD. Joint FAO/IAEA Mutant Variety Database http://mvgs.iaea.org/AboutMutantVarieties.aspx, accessed 10 August 2015.
Goodman, R.M., Hauptli, H., Crossway, A. & Knauf, V.C. Gene transfer in crop improvement. Science 236, 48–54 (1987).
Young, N.D. & Tanksley, S.D. RFLP analysis of the size of chromosomal segments retained around the Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77, 353–359 (1989).
Hajjar, R. & Hodgkin, T. The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: A survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156, 1–13 (2007).
Steiner, H.Y. et al. Evaluating the potential for adverse interactions within genetically modified breeding stacks. Plant Physiol. 161, 1587–1594 (2013).
Committee on Scientific Evaluation of the Introduction of Genetically Modified Microorganisms and Plants into the Environment, NRC. Field Testing Genetically Engineered Organisms: Framework for Decisions (National Academies Press, 1989).
National Biotechnology Policy Board. 1992 National Biotechnology Policy Board Report (National Institutes of Health). Biotechnol. Law Rep. 12, 127–182 (1992).
OECD. Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Improving the Quality of Government Regulation, including the OECD Reference Checklist for Regulatory Decision Making (OECD, Paris, 1995).
OECD. Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and Governance (OECD, Paris, 2012).
WTO. Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. Annex 1A, Multilateral Agreement on Trade in Goods: Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (WTO, Geneva, 1994). https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/15-sps.pdf
OSTP. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; announcement of policy; notice for public comment. Fed. Regist. 51, 23302–23350 (1986).
EPA. Regulations under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act for Plant-Incorporated Protectants (Formerly Plant-Pesticides). Fed. Regist. 66, 37772–37817 (2001).
Ames, B.N., Profet, M. & Gold, L.S. Dietary pesticides (99.99% all natural). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7777–7781 (1990).
EPA. Pesticides import enforcement: Pioneer Hi-Bred https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014–07/documents/pioneer-cafo.pdf (2013). https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/pesticides-imports-enforcement-pioneer
EPA. Pioneer Hi-Bred fined for illegally importing genetically modified corn seed. Pesticide Import Watch Newslett. 14, 3 (2014).
Bock, R. The give-and-take of DNA: horizontal gene transfer in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 11–22 (2010).
Staginnus, C. & Richert-Pöggeler, K.R. Endogenous pararetroviruses: two-faced travelers in the plant genome. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 485–491 (2006).
Pollack, A. By “editing” plant genes companies avoid regulation. New York Times B2 (2 January 2015).
Camacho, A., Van Deynze, A., Chi-Ham, C. & Bennett, A.B. Genetically engineered crops that fly under the US regulatory radar. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1087–1091 (2014).
Price, W.D. & Underhill, L. Application of laws, policies, and guidance from the United States and Canada to the regulation of food and feed derived from genetically modified crops: interpretation of composition data. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 8349–8355 (2013).
Van Haver, E. et al. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46, S2–S70 (2008).
GRACE. Conclusions and Recommendations on Animal Feeding Trials and Alternative Approaches and on the Use of Systematic Reviews on Evidence Maps for GMO Impact Assessment http://www.grace-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/GRACE_Conclusions%20&Recommendations.pdf (2015).
Kessler, D.A., Taylor, M.R., Maryanski, J.H., Flamm, E.L. & Kahl, K.S. The safety of foods developed by biotechnology. Science 256, 1747–1749 (1992).
Mumm, R.H. A look at product development with genetically modified crops: examples from maize. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 8254–8259 (2013).
Privalle, L.S., Gillikin, N. & Wandelt, C. Bringing a transgenic crop to market: where compositional analysis fits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 8260–8266 (2013).
Weber, N. et al. Crop genome plasticity and its relevance to food and feed safety of genetically engineered breeding stacks. Plant Physiol. 160, 1842–1853 (2012).
Anonymous. Genetically modified mush. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 2 (2006).
Lee, R.Y. et al. Genetically modified a-amylase inhibitor peas are not specifically allergenic in mice. PLoS One 8, e52972 (2013).
Bradford, K.J., Van Deynze, A., Gutterson, N., Parrott, W. & Strauss, S.H. Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 439–444 (2005).
Animal Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/petitions_table_pending.html (2015), accessed 5 July 2015.
USDA-APHIS Biotechnology Regulatory Services. Request to Extend Nonregulated Status from a Previous Determination: Extension Guidance for Developers http://www.aphis.usda.gov (22 February 2016).
FDA. Statement of policy—foods derived from new plant varieties. Fed. Regist. 57, 22984–23006 (1992).
Liu, W., Yuan, J.S. & Stewart, C.N. Jr. Advanced genetic tools for plant biotechnology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 781–793 (2013).
CDC. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories edn. 5 http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety/publications/bmbl5/BMBL.pdf (2009).
Wolt, J.D. et al. Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Res. 19, 425–436 (2010).
Taheripour, F., Mahaffey, H. & Tyner, W. Evaluation of economic, land use, and land use emission impacts of substituting non-GMO crops for GMO in the U.S. AgBioForum (in the press).
Office of the Gene Regulator (OGTR), Australia. Risk Analysis Framework http://www.ogtr.gov.au (2009), accessed 15 August 2009.
OECD. Guiding Principles for Regulatory Quality and Performance (OECD, Paris, 2005).
Goodman, R.E., Panda, R. & Ariyarathna, H. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 8317–8332 (2013).
Delaney, B. et al. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of biotechnology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46, S71–S97 (2008).
Hammond, B., Kough, J., Herouet-Guicheney, C. & Jez, J.M. ILSI International Food Biotechnology Committee Task Force on Use of Mammalian Toxicology Studies in Safety Assessment of GM Foods. Toxicological evaluation of proteins introduced into food crops. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 43 (Suppl. 2), 25–42 (2013).
Kuiper, H.A., Kleter, G.A., Noteborn, H.P. & Kok, E.J. Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J. 27, 503–528 (2001).
Cellini, F. et al. Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42, 1089–1125 (2004).
Shewry, P.R. et al. Natural variation in grain composition of wheat and related cereals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 8295–8303 (2013).
Brune, P.D., Culler, A.H., Ridley, W.P. & Walker, K. Safety of GM crops: compositional analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 8243–8247 (2013).
König, A. et al. Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42, 1047–1088 (2004).
Bartholomaeus, A., Parrott, W., Bondy, G. & Walker, K. ILSI International Food Biotechnology Committee Task Force on Use of Mammalian Toxicology Studies in Safety Assessment of GM Foods. The use of whole food animal studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: limitations and recommendations. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 43 (Suppl. 2), 1–24 (2013).
NRC Committee on Scientific Evaluation of the Introduction of Genetically Modified Microorganisms and Plants into the Environment. Field Testing Genetically Engineered Organisms: Framework for Decisions (NRC, Washington, DC, 1989).
Parrott, W. et al. Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 48, 1773–1790 (2010).
Weber, N. et al. Evaluating the potential for adverse interactions within genetically engineered breeding stacks. Plant Physiol. 161, 1587–1594 (2013).
McDougall, P. The Cost and Time Involved in the Discovery, Development and Authorisation of a New Plant Biotechnology Derived Trait http://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf_files/Getting-a-Biotech-Crop-to-Market-Phillips-McDougall-Study.pdf (2011).
Newell-McGloughlin, M. Nutritionally improved agricultural crops. Plant Physiol. 147, 939–953 (2008).
Murray, J.D. & Maga, E.A. A new paradigm for regulating genetically engineered animals that are used as food. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3410–3413 (2016).
Clinton, W. Executive Order no. 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review. Fed. Regist. 58, 51735 (1993).
OSTP. Principles for regulation and oversight of emerging technologies: memorandum for heads of executive departments and agencies (OSTP, 11 March 2011).
Sasu, M., Ferrari, M.J. & Stephenson, A.G. Interrelationships among a virus-resistant transgene, herbivory, and a bacterial disease in a wild cucurbita. Intl. J. Plant Sci. 171, 1048–1058 (2010).
Snow, A.A. et al. A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecol. Appl. 13, 279–286 (2003).
Burke, J.M. & Rieseberg, L.H. Fitness effects of transgenic disease resistance in sunflowers. Science 300, 1250 (2003).
Miller, H.I. & Conko, G. The Frankenfood Myth (Praeger Publishers, Westport, Connecticut, USA, 2004).
Biopesticides Registration Action Document Proposed Decision: Coat Protein Gene of Plum Pox Virus. PC Code 006354 (EPA, 7 May 2010).
D.K. is a retired law professor who has represented clients and served as an expert witness in matters relating to agricultural biotechnology. G.C. is at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which has received non-directed contributions from Monsanto, Syngenta, and the Biotechnology Innovation Organization. W.P. performs public-sector-funded research with genetically modified crops and has done public outreach under the auspices of the ILSI International Food Biotechnology Committee and CropLife International. H.M. has been an expert consultant in litigation involving agribusiness companies
Editor's note: This article has been peer-reviewed.
About this article
Cite this article
Conko, G., Kershen, D., Miller, H. et al. A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms. Nat Biotechnol 34, 493–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3568
The ISME Journal (2021)
Ethics, Policy & Environment (2021)
Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene (2021)
Agricultural & Environmental Letters (2020)