Perspective | Published:

Quality cell therapy manufacturing by design

Nature Biotechnology volume 34, pages 393400 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Transplantation of live cells as therapeutic agents is poised to offer new treatment options for a wide range of acute and chronic diseases. However, the biological complexity of cells has hampered the translation of laboratory-scale experiments into industrial processes for reliable, cost-effective manufacturing of cell-based therapies. We argue here that a solution to this challenge is to design cell manufacturing processes according to quality-by-design (QbD) principles. QbD integrates scientific knowledge and risk analysis into manufacturing process development and is already being adopted by the biopharmaceutical industry. Many opportunities to incorporate QbD into cell therapy manufacturing exist, although further technology development is required for full implementation. Linking measurable molecular and cellular characteristics of a cell population to final product quality through QbD is a crucial step in realizing the potential for cell therapies to transform healthcare.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & The systematic production of cells for cell therapies. Cell Stem Cell 3, 369–381 (2008).

  2. 2.

    US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Q8(R2) pharmaceutical development. (International Conference on Harmonization, 2009).

  3. 3.

    & Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 26–34 (2009).

  4. 4.

    Alliance for Regenerative Medicine. Annual Data Report on Gene and Cellular Therapies and the Regenerative Medicine Sector. (2015).

  5. 5.

    et al. Meeting report: applied biopharmaceutics and quality by design for dissolution/release specification setting: product quality for patient benefit. AAPS J. 12, 465–472 (2010).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Advances in umbilical cord blood manipulation-from niche to bedside. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 12, 163–174 (2015).

  7. 7.

    et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8, 315–317 (2006).

  8. 8.

    , , , & ; MSC Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT). Immunological characterization of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells—The International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) working proposal. Cytotherapy 15, 1054–1061 (2013).

  9. 9.

    et al. Manufacturing validation of biologically functional T cells targeted to CD19 antigen for autologous adoptive cell therapy. J. Immunother. 32, 169–180 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Potency assay development for cellular therapy products: an ISCT review of the requirements and experiences in the industry. Cytotherapy 15, 9–19 (2013).

  11. 11.

    et al. Efficient generation and cryopreservation of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Regen. Med. 6, 53–66 (2011).

  12. 12.

    et al. Myoblasts transplanted into rat infarcted myocardium are functionally isolated from their host. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7808–7811 (2003).

  13. 13.

    et al. Teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells: evaluation of essential parameters for future safety studies. Stem Cell Res. 2, 198–210 (2009).

  14. 14.

    et al. Distinct metabolic flow enables large-scale purification of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cell Stem Cell 12, 127–137 (2012).

  15. 15.

    et al. Selective elimination of human pluripotent stem cells by an oleate synthesis inhibitor discovered in a high-throughput screen. Cell Stem Cell 12, 167–179 (2013).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Human mesenchymal stem cells self-renew and differentiate according to a deterministic hierarchy. PLoS One 4, e6498 (2009).

  17. 17.

    et al. Managing particulates in cellular therapy. Cytotherapy 14, 1032–1040 (2012).

  18. 18.

    The United States Pharmacopeia and The National Formulary. Ancillary Materials for Cell, Gene, and Tissue-Engineered Products. USP 29 General Chapter <1043> NF 24 (USP, 2006).

  19. 19.

    , & Standards for ancillary materials used in cell- and tissue-based therapies. Bioprocess Int. 11, 12–22 (2013).

  20. 20.

    et al. Investigations into the metabolism of two-dimensional colony and suspended microcarrier cultures of human embryonic stem cells in serum-free media. Stem Cells Dev. 19, 1781–1792 (2010).

  21. 21.

    et al. Rapid expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells by automated control of inhibitory feedback signaling. Cell Stem Cell 10, 218–229 (2012).

  22. 22.

    et al. Controlling expansion and cardiomyogenic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells in scalable suspension culture. Stem Cell Reports 3, 1132–1146 (2014).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Real-time monitoring and control of soluble signaling factors enables enhanced progenitor cell outputs from human cord blood stem cell cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111, 1258–1264 (2013).

  24. 24.

    et al. High-throughput fingerprinting of human pluripotent stem cell fate responses and lineage bias. Nat. Methods 10, 1225–1231 (2013).

  25. 25.

    , & Adoptive cellular therapy: a race to the finish line. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 280ps7 (2015).

  26. 26.

    , & Application of process quality engineering techniques to improve the understanding of the in vitro processing of stem cells for therapeutic use. J. Biotechnol. 136, 148–155 (2008).

  27. 27.

    , , , & Factorial experimental design for the culture of human embryonic stem cells as aggregates in stirred suspension bioreactors reveals the potential for interaction effects between bioprocess parameters. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 20, 76–89 (2013).

  28. 28.

    et al. Application of response surface methodology to maximize the productivity of scalable automated human embryonic stem cell manufacture. Regen. Med. 8, 39–48 (2013).

  29. 29.

    , & Expansion of hematopoietic progenitor cell populations in stirred suspension bioreactors of normal human bone marrow cells. Biotechnology (NY) 12, 909–914 (1994).

  30. 30.

    , & Ex vivo expansion of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 117, 6083–6090 (2011).

  31. 31.

    , & Conditions controlling the proliferation of haemopoietic stem cells in vitro. J. Cell. Physiol. 91, 335–344 (1977).

  32. 32.

    , & Short-term exposure of umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor early in culture improves ex vivo expansion of neutrophils. Cytotherapy 13, 366–377 (2011).

  33. 33.

    et al. Expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells on microcarriers. Biotechnol. Lett. 33, 2325–2335 (2011).

  34. 34.

    , , & Improving efficiency of human pluripotent stem cell differentiation platforms using an integrated experimental and computational approach. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 110, 3024–3037 (2013).

  35. 35.

    , & An 'omics approach towards CHO cell engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 110, 1255–1271 (2013).

  36. 36.

    et al. Influence of threonine metabolism on S-adenosylmethionine and histone methylation. Science 339, 222–226 (2013).

  37. 37.

    et al. Dependence of mouse embryonic stem cells on threonine catabolism. Science 325, 435–439 (2009).

  38. 38.

    et al. Metabolic profiling and flux analysis of MEL-2 human embryonic stem cells during exponential growth at physiological and atmospheric oxygen concentrations. PLoS One 9, e112757 (2014).

  39. 39.

    et al. PERT: a method for expression deconvolution of human blood samples from varied microenvironmental and developmental conditions. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002838 (2012).

  40. 40.

    , , , & Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency. Science 344, 1156–1160 (2014).

  41. 41.

    US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. PAT: a Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Development, Manufacturing and Quality Assurance. (Pharmaceutical CGMPs, 2004).

  42. 42.

    et al. Multifactorial optimization of gammaretroviral gene transfer into human T lymphocytes for clinical application. Hum. Gene Ther. 18, 1253–1260 (2007).

  43. 43.

    , & Blood stem cell products: toward sustainable benchmarks for clinical translation. BioEssays 35, 201–210 (2013).

  44. 44.

    et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology 142, 46–54.e42 (2012).

  45. 45.

    Health Canada. Summary basis of decision for Prochymal. (2012).

  46. 46.

    et al. Transforming the promise of pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes to a therapy: challenges and solutions for clinical trials. Can. J. Cardiol. 30, 1335–1349 (2014).

  47. 47.

    , , , & MSC-based product characterization for clinical trials: an FDA perspective. Cell Stem Cell 14, 141–145 (2014).

  48. 48.

    , , , & A novel automated bioreactor for scalable process optimisation of haematopoietic stem cell culture. J. Biotechnol. 161, 387–390 (2012).

  49. 49.

    & Human pluripotent stem cell process parameter optimization in a small scale suspension bioreactor. BMC Proceedings 9 (Suppl 9), O10 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the P.Z. laboratory as well as D. Baksh, M. Curtis, E. Csaszar, J. Lebkowski, A. Lipsitz and R. Preti for constructive comments and apologize to colleagues whose research we were unable to cite due to space constraints. F. Agbanyo, chief of Blood, Cells, Tissues and Organs Division, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada, Government of Canada is gratefully acknowledged for her careful review and suggested revisions of this manuscript. For clarity, the perspectives expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent the opinion of Health Canada. Y.Y.L. is supported by an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship, and P.W.Z. is supported as the Canada Research Chair in Stem Cell Bioengineering.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    • Yonatan Y Lipsitz
    •  & Peter W Zandstra
  2. Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    • Nicholas E Timmins
    •  & Peter W Zandstra
  3. The Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    • Peter W Zandstra
  4. Medicine by Design: A Canada First Research Excellence Fund Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    • Peter W Zandstra

Authors

  1. Search for Yonatan Y Lipsitz in:

  2. Search for Nicholas E Timmins in:

  3. Search for Peter W Zandstra in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter W Zandstra.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3525

Further reading