Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas-mediated genome editing relies on guide RNAs that direct site-specific DNA cleavage facilitated by the Cas endonuclease. Here we report that chemical alterations to synthesized single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) enhance genome editing efficiency in human primary T cells and CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Co-delivering chemically modified sgRNAs with Cas9 mRNA or protein is an efficient RNA- or ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-based delivery method for the CRISPR-Cas system, without the toxicity associated with DNA delivery. This approach is a simple and effective way to streamline the development of genome editing with the potential to accelerate a wide array of biotechnological and therapeutic applications of the CRISPR-Cas technology.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Synthesized and chemically modified sgRNAs facilitate high frequencies of indels and HR in the human cell line K562.
Figure 2: Chemically modified sgRNAs facilitate high frequencies of gene disruption in stimulated primary human T cells and CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs).

References

  1. 1

    Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).

  2. 2

    Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).

  3. 3

    Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR-Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).

  4. 4

    Hsu, P.D., Lander, E.S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262–1278 (2014).

  5. 5

    Hendel, A., Fine, E.J., Bao, G. & Porteus, M.H. Quantifying on- and off-target genome editing. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 132–140 (2015).

  6. 6

    Dellinger, D.J. et al. Streamlined process for the chemical synthesis of RNA using 2′-O-thionocarbamate-protected nucleoside phosphoramidites in the solid phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11540–11556 (2011).

  7. 7

    Deleavey, G.F. & Damha, M.J. Designing chemically modified oligonucleotides for targeted gene silencing. Chem. Biol. 19, 937–954 (2012).

  8. 8

    Eckstein, F. Phosphorothioates, essential components of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Ther. 24, 374–387 (2014).

  9. 9

    Dellinger, D.J., Sheehan, D.M., Christensen, N.K., Lindberg, J.G. & Caruthers, M.H. Solid-phase chemical synthesis of phosphonoacetate and thiophosphonoacetate oligodeoxynucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 940–950 (2003).

  10. 10

    Hendel, A. et al. Quantifying genome-editing outcomes at endogenous loci with SMRT sequencing. Cell Reports 7, 293–305 (2014).

  11. 11

    Cradick, T.J., Fine, E.J., Antico, C.J. & Bao, G. CRISPR-Cas9 systems targeting beta-globin and CCR5 genes have substantial off-target activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 9584–9592 (2013).

  12. 12

    Tebas, P. et al. Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of persons infected with HIV. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 901–910 (2014).

  13. 13

    Lombardo, A. et al. Site-specific integration and tailoring of cassette design for sustainable gene transfer. Nat. Methods 8, 861–869 (2011).

  14. 14

    Voit, R.A., Hendel, A., Pruett-Miller, S.M. & Porteus, M.H. Nuclease-mediated gene editing by homologous recombination of the human globin locus. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 1365–1378 (2014).

  15. 15

    Hsu, P.D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832 (2013).

  16. 16

    Cradick, T.J., Qiu, P., Lee, C.M., Fine, E.J. & Bao, G. COSMID: a web-based tool for identifying and validating CRISPR-Cas off-target sites. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, e214 (2014).

  17. 17

    Yi, G. et al. CCR5 gene editing of resting CD4(+) T cells by transient ZFN expression from HIV envelope pseudotyped nonintegrating lentivirus confers HIV-1 resistance in humanized mice. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, e198 (2014).

  18. 18

    Mandal, P.K. et al. Efficient ablation of genes in human hematopoietic stem and effector cells using CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell 15, 643–652 (2014).

  19. 19

    Gilbert, L.A. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159, 647–661 (2014).

  20. 20

    Chen, B. et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 155, 1479–1491 (2013).

  21. 21

    O'Connell, M.R. et al. Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. Nature 516, 263–266 (2014).

  22. 22

    Threlfall, R.N., Torres, A.G., Krivenko, A., Gait, M.J. & Caruthers, M.H. Synthesis and biological activity of phosphonoacetate- and thiophosphonoacetate-modified 2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 10, 746–754 (2012).

  23. 23

    Brinkman, E.K., Chen, T., Amendola, M. & van Steensel, B. Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e168 (2014).

  24. 24

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.H. was supported by the Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation. R.O.B. was supported through an Individual Postdoctoral grant (DFF–1333-00106B) and a Sapere Aude, Research Talent grant (DFF–1331-00735B), both from the Danish Council for Independent Research, Medical Sciences. M.H.P. gratefully acknowledges the support of the Amon Carter Foundation, the Laurie Krauss Lacob Faculty Scholar Award in Pediatric Translational Research and US National Institutes of Health grant support PN2EY018244 and R01-AI097320. We thank R. Perriman, and Porteus laboratory members and C. Carstens, S. Laderman and Agilent laboratories members for helpful input, comments and discussion.

Author information

A.H. and R.O.B. contributed equally to this work. A.H., R.O.B., J.T.C., A.B.W., R.B., A.B.K. and D.E.R. performed and designed experiments. D.D., D.E.R. and R.J.K. chose the specific modification types and the positions for their incorporation into the sgRNAs. S.R., B.D.L. and R.J.K. performed synthesis and purification of all the sgRNAs. I.S. and A.T. developed and applied the sequencing data analysis pipeline used to analyze the deep sequencing data. L.B. and M.H.P. directed the research. A.H. and R.O.B. wrote the manuscript with help from all authors.

Correspondence to Laurakay Bruhn or Matthew H Porteus.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.B.K., D.E.R., I.S., B.D.L., R.J.K., A.T., D.D. and L.B. are employees of Agilent Technologies. M.H.P. is a consultant and has equity interest in CRISPR Tx, but CRISPR Tx had no input into the design, execution, interpretation or publication of the results herein.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–16, Supplementary Tables 1–5 and Supplementary Notes 1 and 2 (PDF 999 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hendel, A., Bak, R., Clark, J. et al. Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nat Biotechnol 33, 985–989 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3290

Download citation

Further reading