Bioinformatic imputation of epigenomic marks promises to supplement catalogs of experimental data.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
ENCODE Project Consortium. Science 306, 636–640 (2004).
Bernstein, B.E. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 1045–1048 (2010).
Adams, D. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 224–226 (2012).
Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 364–376 (2015).
Bock, C. & Lengauer, T. Bioinformatics 24, 1–10 (2008).
Marchini, J. & Howie, B. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 499–511 (2010).
Stolovitzky, G., Monroe, D. & Califano, A. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1115, 1–22 (2007).
Farlik, M. et al. Cell Rep. 10, 1386–1397 (2015).
Smallwood, S.A. et al. Nat. Methods 11, 817–820 (2014).
Teschendorff, A.E. et al. Genome Med. 4, 24 (2012).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebert, P., Bock, C. Improving reference epigenome catalogs by computational prediction. Nat Biotechnol 33, 354–355 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3194