An important US Supreme Court ruling means that prudent owners, end users and other courts will proceed with caution.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Lee, D.H. et al. Nature 382, 525–528 (1996).
Zheng, J. et al. Nature 461, 74–77 (2009).
Baumann, K. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 266–267 (2013).
Engelman, A. & Cherepanov, P. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 279–290 (2012).
See Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 312–313 (1980).
See J.E.M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Intern, Inc., 534 U.S. 124 (2001).
The Plant Patent Act of 1930, as amended in 1952 (placing plant patents into Chapter 15 of Title 35 entitled “Patents for Plants” at 35.U.S.C. §§161–164.4).
The Plant Variety Protection Act of 1970, as amended (7 U.S.C. §§2321–2582).
Pardey, P. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 25–29 (2013).
Ledford, H. Nature News Blog (15 April 2013). <http://blogs.nature.com/news/2013/04/us-supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-gene-patent-case.html>
Mears, B. CNN Health (17 April 2013). <http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/15/health/court-genes>
Francisco, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 268 (2013).
Bowman v. Monsanto Co., et al. 657 F. 3d 1341, affirmed.
Briefs of record, including brief of respondents Monsanto Co., et al. in opposition filed 27 February, 2012 and Supplemental brief of petitioner Vernon Hugh Bowman filed 4 September 2012 (collectively, “the record”).<http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/bowman-v-monsanto-co/>
Anonymous. Encyclopedia Britannica Online Library Edition, Web 18 (2013) <http://britannica.com/search?query=soybean>.
Singh, P. et al. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety 7, 14–28 (2008).
USDA Economic Research Service. Soybeans & oil crops: background (22 January 2013). <http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/soybeans-oil-crops/background.aspx>
See asserted claims 1-2, 4-5 and 102–108, 115–117, 119, 122–123, 126 and 128–130, respectively.
Burchfiel, K.J. Biotechnology and the Federal Circuit, Second Edition. (BNA Bloomberg, 2012).
Brief amicus curiae of CropLife America, filed 23 January, 2013.
Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 553 US 617, 128 S. Ct. 2109, 170 L. Ed. 2d 996, 86 USPQ 2d 1673, 2008 ILRC 2003 (2008). <http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/quanta-v-lg/>
Acknowledgements
The views expressed herein are for educational purposes only, are not to be construed as legal advice, nor do they represent the view of Sughrue or any of its clients. The author thanks K.J. Burchfiel for insightful discussions and J.E. Dyer for her assistance in preparing this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simmons, W. Bowman v. Monsanto and the protection of patented replicative biologic technologies. Nat Biotechnol 31, 602–606 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2625
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2625