Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

DNA goes to court

This article has been updated

DNA profiling is playing a growing role in solving crimes, identifying victims of natural and unnatural disasters and even tracking diplomats. Some forensic experts are looking to advances in genome technologies to gain further ground against criminals.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Forty shades of color.
Figure 2: STR profiles.

Fluorescent yield

Figure 3: Blue marks the criminal.
Figure 4: Locations of national DNA databases.

Change history

  • 21 December 2012

    In the version of this article initially published, on p. 1050, column 1, Illumina's MiSeq platform was said to require 50 ng of DNA input. When used in conjunction with the company's Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation Kit, however, it requires 1 ng. The legend for Figure 1 referred to “blue” eye color, even though the figure also showed brown eyes, and stated that 40 different shades of blue eye color are determined by IrisPlex system. The system is not limited to blue eye color. A typo in the Figure 4 legend “pperational” has been corrected to “operational.” The errors have been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.


  1. 1

    Liu, F. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies five loci influencing facial morphology in Europeans. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002932 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Illumina Enters Collaborative Research Agreement with UNTHSC for Next-Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Analysis. October 4, 2011, available at:

  3. 3

    Kayser, M. & deKnijff, P. Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 179–192 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Jobling, M. & Gill, P. Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 739–751 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Thompson, W. The myth of infallibility. in Genetic Explorations: Sense and Nonsense (eds. Krimsky, S. & Gruber, J.) 227–255 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA in press).

  6. 6

    Haskell v. Harris, — F.3d — (9th Cir. (Cal) 2012).

  7. 7

    Ackerman, M.J., Tester, D.J., Porter, J. & Edwards, W. Molecular diagnosis of the inherited Long QT syndrome in a woman who died after near drowning. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 1121–1125 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Tester, D.J., Medeiros-Domingo, A., Will, M.L., Haglund, C.M. & Ackerman, M.J. Cardiac channel molecular autopsy: insights from 173 consecutive cases of autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death referred for postmortem genetic testing. Mayo Clin. Proc. 87, 524–539 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Akerman, M.J. et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. Heart Rhythm 8, 1308–1339 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


SS received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottowa, Canada.

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, C., Strauss, S. & DeFrancesco, L. DNA goes to court. Nat Biotechnol 30, 1047–1053 (2012).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing