This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
WTO/FAO/WHO. The WTO and the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius (2011). <http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/coher_e/wto_codex_e.htm>.
Anonymous. Nature 356, 1–2 (1992).
FDA. Statement of policy—food derived from new plant varieties. (FDA, 2010). <http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/Biotechnology/ucm096095.htm> (accessed 8/5/11).
<http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/report/765/REP11_FLe.pdf> (accessed October 14, 2011).
FAO/WHO. Note to the press issued by WHO on the outcome of the 34th Codex Alimentarius Commission. (FAO/WTO, 2011). <ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/CAC/cac34/Codex_note_EN.pdf> (accessed August 5, 2011).
Anonymous. Codex Alimentarius adopts labeling of genetically modified foods. (Food Freedom, July 5, 2011). <http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/codex-alimentarius-adopts-labeling-of-genetically-modified-foods/> (accessed August 5, 2011).
Anonymous. Consumer rights victory as US ends opposition to GM labelling guidelines. (Consumers International, July 5, 2011). <http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/news/2011/07/gm-labelling-victory-as-us-ends-opposition> (accessed August 5, 2011).
Brown, E. Genetically modified food labels don't sit well in US. (Los Angeles Times, July 10, 2011). <http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/10/health/la-he-gmo-foods-20110710> (accessed August 5, 2011).
FAO/WHO. Report of the Thirty-Ninth Session of the Codex Committee on Food Labeling. REP11/FL, Appendix III (FAO and WTO, 2011). <http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/archives.jsp>.
Anonymous. Codex Alimentarius negotiations progress and prospects. (Council of the European Union, May 10, 2011). <http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/11/st09/st09859.en11.pdf> (accessed August 5, 2011).
Miller, H.I. A label we don't need. (Hoover Daily Report, November 18, 2002). <http://www.hoover.org/news/daily-report/25572> (accessed August 5, 2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, H., Kershen, D. A label we don't need. Nat Biotechnol 29, 971–972 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2027
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2027