Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

A label we don't need

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. WTO/FAO/WHO. The WTO and the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius (2011). <http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/coher_e/wto_codex_e.htm>.

  2. Anonymous. Nature 356, 1–2 (1992).

  3. FDA. Statement of policy—food derived from new plant varieties. (FDA, 2010). <http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/Biotechnology/ucm096095.htm> (accessed 8/5/11).

  4. <http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/report/765/REP11_FLe.pdf> (accessed October 14, 2011).

  5. FAO/WHO. Note to the press issued by WHO on the outcome of the 34th Codex Alimentarius Commission. (FAO/WTO, 2011). <ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/CAC/cac34/Codex_note_EN.pdf> (accessed August 5, 2011).

  6. Anonymous. Codex Alimentarius adopts labeling of genetically modified foods. (Food Freedom, July 5, 2011). <http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/codex-alimentarius-adopts-labeling-of-genetically-modified-foods/> (accessed August 5, 2011).

  7. Anonymous. Consumer rights victory as US ends opposition to GM labelling guidelines. (Consumers International, July 5, 2011). <http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/news/2011/07/gm-labelling-victory-as-us-ends-opposition> (accessed August 5, 2011).

  8. Brown, E. Genetically modified food labels don't sit well in US. (Los Angeles Times, July 10, 2011). <http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/10/health/la-he-gmo-foods-20110710> (accessed August 5, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. FAO/WHO. Report of the Thirty-Ninth Session of the Codex Committee on Food Labeling. REP11/FL, Appendix III (FAO and WTO, 2011). <http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/archives.jsp>.

  10. Anonymous. Codex Alimentarius negotiations progress and prospects. (Council of the European Union, May 10, 2011). <http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/11/st09/st09859.en11.pdf> (accessed August 5, 2011).

  11. Miller, H.I. A label we don't need. (Hoover Daily Report, November 18, 2002). <http://www.hoover.org/news/daily-report/25572> (accessed August 5, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry I Miller.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, H., Kershen, D. A label we don't need. Nat Biotechnol 29, 971–972 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2027

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2027

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research