The Japanese Intellectual Property High Court recently issued two decisions that bolster the market exclusivity period for brand biologic manufacturers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Tessensohn, J.A. & Yamamoto, S. World Intell. Prop. Law Rep. 23, 31–32 (2009).
Connolly, C. & Shear, M.D. Discord on health care dulls luster of new pacts. Washington Post 9 July 2009, A1.
Anonymous. Biotech bottleneck. Washington Post 29 July 2009, A16.
Pollack, A. Costly drugs known as biologics prompt exclusivity debate. New York Times 22 July 2009, B1.
Belsey, M.J., Harris, L.M., Das, R.R. & Chertkow, J. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 535–536 (2006).
Anonymous. Merck to storm Japan with generic biologics. Nihon Keizai Shimbun 3 March 2010.
Anonymous. Nichi-Iko eyes biodrug sales in 3 years with Sanofi-Aventis' help. Nihon Keizai Shimbun 1 June 2010.
GlaxoSmithKline acquired the ex-Japan development and marketing rights to JCR's biosimilar JR-013, a FOB recombinant human erythropoietin kappa that has been approved for renal anaemia in kidney dialysis patients and premature infants, JCR Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., Press Release: Comprehensive Agreement on Biopharmaceuticals Business, Dec. 18, 2009.
Anonymous. Teva-Kowa, Nippon Kayaku to develop generic for chemotherapy. Nihon Keizai Shimbun 20 April 2010.
Immunex Corp. v. Commissioner of Japan Patent Office, H-21 (gyo-ke) No. 10092 and H-21 (gyo-ke) No. 10093 dated Dec. 3, 2009, Intellectual Property High Court of Japan.
Wyeth, K.K. & Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Press release: announcing launch of ENBREL, treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. http://www.takeda.com/press/article_1097.html (29 March, 2005).
Jacobsen, T.M. & Wertheimer, A.I. Modern Pharmaceutical Industry: A Primer (Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, USA, 2010).
Tessensohn, J.A. & Yamamoto, S. World. Intell. Prop. Law Rep. 19, 21–22 (2005).
Tessensohn, J.A. & Yamamoto, S. World. Intell. Prop. Law Rep 2010/1 18–19 (2010). http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2010/01/article_0007.html.
Japan Patent Office. Annual Report 2006 (Japanese Version) (JPO, Tokyo, 2006).
Japan Patent Office. Annual Report 2009 (Japanese Version) (JPO, Tokyo, 2009).
Schellekens, H. & Moors, E. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 28–31 (2010).
US Department of Health and Human Services et al. Guidance for industry Q5E comparability of biotechnological/biological products subject to changes in their manufacturing process. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm128076.pdf (June 2005).
Tessensohn, J.A. Modified-Release Drug Delivery Technology. (Rathbone, M.J. et al., eds.) 45–51 (Informa Healthcare, New York, 2008).
Wyeth v. Kappos, 93 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1227 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
Tomomi, A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 533–535 (2007).
Tessensohn, J.A. & Yamamoto, S. Biotechnol. Law Rep. 28 483–496 (2009).
Tessensohn, J.A. & Yamamoto, S. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 815–818 (2009).
Acknowledgements
The views and considerations of this article reflect only those of the authors and should not be attributed to Shusaku Yamamoto Co. or to any of its past, present or future clients.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tessensohn, J., Yamamoto, S. Patent term extensions for biologic innovators in Japan. Nat Biotechnol 29, 34–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1743
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1743