The vast majority of proteomic studies to date have relied on mass spectrometric techniques to identify, and in some cases quantify, peptides that have been generated by proteolysis. Current approaches differ in the types of instrument used, their performance profiles, the manner in which they interface with biological research strategies, and their reliance on and use of prior information. Here, we consider the three main mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic approaches used today: shotgun (or discovery), directed and targeted strategies. We discuss the principles of each technique, their strengths and weaknesses and the dependence of their performance profiles on the composition of the biological sample. Our goal is to provide a rational framework for selecting strategies optimally suited to address the specific research issue under consideration.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Schrimpf, S.P. et al. Comparative functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster proteomes. PLoS Biol. 7, e48 (2009).
Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198–207 (2003).
Domon, B. & Aebersold, R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 312, 212–217 (2006).
Bantscheff, M., Schirle, M., Sweetman, G., Rick, J. & Kuster, B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 389, 1017–1031 (2007).
Listgarten, J. & Emili, A. Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 419–434 (2005).
Shevchenko, A., Loboda, A., Ens, W. & Standing, K.G. MALDI quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry: a powerful tool for proteomic research. Anal. Chem. 72, 2132–2141 (2000).
Medzihradszky, K.F. et al. The characteristics of peptide collision-induced dissociation using a high-performance MALDI-TOF/TOF tandem mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 72, 552–558 (2000).
Beausoleil, S.A., Villen, J., Gerber, S.A., Rush, J. & Gygi, S.P. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1285–1292 (2006).
de Godoy, L.M. et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 455, 1251–1254 (2008).
Denny, P. et al. The proteomes of human parotid and submandibular/sublingual gland salivas collected as the ductal secretions. J. Proteome Res. 7, 1994–2006 (2008).
Parag Mallick, P. & Bernhard Kuster, B. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 695–709 (2010).
Tabb, D.L. et al. Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 9, 761–776 (2010).
Paulovich, A.G. et al. Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 242–254 (2010).
Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D. & Yates, J.R. III. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 242–247 (2001).
Bell, A.W. et al. A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 6, 423–430 (2009).
Kuster, B., Schirle, M., Mallick, P. & Aebersold, R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 577–583 (2005).
Duncan, M., Aebersold, R. & Caprioli, R. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 659–664 (2010).
Syka, J.E., Coon, J.J., Schroeder, M.J., Shabanowitz, J. & Hunt, D.F. Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9528–9533 (2004).
Coon, J.J. Collisions or electrons? Protein sequence analysis in the 21st century. Anal. Chem. 81, 3208–3215 (2009).
Schmidt, A. et al. An integrated, directed mass spectrometric approach for in-depth characterization of complex peptide mixtures. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 2138–2150 (2008).
Domon, B. & Broder, S. Implications of new proteomics strategies for biology and medicine. J. Proteome Res. 3, 253–260 (2004).
Jaffe, J.D. et al. Accurate inclusion mass screening: a bridge from unbiased discovery to targeted assay development for biomarker verification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1952–1962 (2008).
Schmidt, A., Claassen, M. & Aebersold, R. Directed mass spectrometry: towards hypothesis-driven proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 510–517 (2009).
Baty, J.D. & Robinson, P.R. Single and multiple ion recording techniques for the analysis of diphenylhydantoin and its major metabolite in plasma. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 4, 36–41 (1977).
Stahl-Zeng, J. et al. High sensitivity detection of plasma proteins by multiple reaction monitoring of N-glycosites. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1809–1817 (2007).
Picotti, P. et al. A database of mass spectrometric assays for the yeast proteome. Nat. Methods 5, 913–914 (2008).
Pan, C., Olsen, J.V., Daub, H. & Mann, M. Global effects of kinase inhibitors on signaling networks revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 2796–2808 (2009).
Malmstrom, J. et al. Proteome-wide cellular protein concentrations of the human pathogen Leptospira interrogans. Nature 460, 762–765 (2009).
Addona, T.A. et al. Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 633–641 (2009).
Ross, P.L. et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 1154–1169 (2004).
Gerber, S.A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M.W. & Gygi, S.P. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6940–6945 (2003).
Rivers, J., Simpson, D.M., Robertson, D.H., Gaskell, S.J. & Beynon, R.J. Absolute multiplexed quantitative analysis of protein expression during muscle development using QconCAT. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1416–1427 (2007).
Wolf-Yadlin, A., Hautaniemi, S., Lauffenburger, D.A. & White, F.M. Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5860–5865 (2007).
Picotti, P. et al. High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat. Methods 7, 43–46 (2010).
We thank P. Picotti, A. Schmidt and N. Selevsek for the preparation of figures. The Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 3100AO-107679), SystemsX.ch, the Swiss initiative for systems biology and the European Research Council are acknowledged for financial support.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Domon, B., Aebersold, R. Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy. Nat Biotechnol 28, 710–721 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1661
Clinical biomarker discovery by SWATH-MS based label-free quantitative proteomics: impact of criteria for identification of differentiators and data normalization method
Journal of Translational Medicine (2019)
BMC Bioinformatics (2019)