Letter | Published:

Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system

Nature volume 555, pages 657661 (29 March 2018) | Download Citation


Imaging human brain function with techniques such as magnetoencephalography1 typically requires a subject to perform tasks while their head remains still within a restrictive scanner. This artificial environment makes the technique inaccessible to many people, and limits the experimental questions that can be addressed. For example, it has been difficult to apply neuroimaging to investigation of the neural substrates of cognitive development in babies and children, or to study processes in adults that require unconstrained head movement (such as spatial navigation). Here we describe a magnetoencephalography system that can be worn like a helmet, allowing free and natural movement during scanning. This is possible owing to the integration of quantum sensors2,3, which do not rely on superconducting technology, with a system for nulling background magnetic fields. We demonstrate human electrophysiological measurement at millisecond resolution while subjects make natural movements, including head nodding, stretching, drinking and playing a ball game. Our results compare well to those of the current state-of-the-art, even when subjects make large head movements. The system opens up new possibilities for scanning any subject or patient group, with myriad applications such as characterization of the neurodevelopmental connectome, imaging subjects moving naturally in a virtual environment and investigating the pathophysiology of movement disorders.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Magnetoencephalography: detection of the brain’s electrical activity with a superconducting magnetometer. Science 175, 664–666 (1972).

  2. 2.

    , , & A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer. Nature 422, 596–599 (2003).

  3. 3.

    & A compact, high performance atomic magnetometer for biomedical applications. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 8153–8161 (2013).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation, and applications to non-invasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 413–497 (1993)

  5. 5.

    et al. Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage 65, 349–363 (2013).

  6. 6.

    , , & High-sensitivity atomic magnetometer unaffected by spin-exchange relaxation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 130801 (2002).

  7. 7.

    , , & Subpicotesla atomic magnetometry with a microfabricated vapour cell. Nat. Photon. 1, 649–652 (2007)

  8. 8.

    , & Detection of very weak magnetic fields (10–9 gauss) by 87Rb zero-field level crossing resonances. Phys. Lett. A 28, 638–639 (1969)

  9. 9.

    . et al. A 20-channel magnetoencephalography system based on optically pumped magnetometers. Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 8909–8923 (2017)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Magnetoencephalography of epilepsy with a microfabricated atomic magnetrode. J. Neurosci. 34, 14324–14327 (2014).

  11. 11.

    et al. Magnetic field imaging with microfabricated optically-pumped magnetometers. Opt. Express 25, 7849–7858 (2017).

  12. 12.

    et al. A new generation of magnetoencephalography: room temperature measurements using optically-pumped magnetometers. Neuroimage 149, 404–414 (2017).

  13. 13.

    , & Magnetoencephalography with a two-color pump-probe, fiber-coupled atomic magnetometer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 243703 (2010)

  14. 14.

    , & Multi-sensor magnetoencephalography with atomic magnetometers. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 6065–6077 (2013).

  15. 15.

    et al. Human magnetoencephalogram measurements using newly developed compact module of high-sensitivity atomic magnetometer. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 026601 (2015)

  16. 16.

    et al. Multi-channel atomic magnetometer for magnetoencephalography: a configuration study. Neuroimage 89, 143–151 (2014).

  17. 17.

    & Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 1842–1857 (1999).

  18. 18.

    , , & Neuromagnetic imaging of movement-related cortical oscillations in children and adults: age predicts post-movement beta rebound. Neuroimage 51, 792–807 (2010).

  19. 19.

    et al. Aging reduces experience-induced sensorimotor plasticity. a magnetoencephalographic study. Neuroimage 104, 59–68 (2015).

  20. 20.

    et al. Abnormal visuomotor processing in schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin. 12, 869–878 (2016).

  21. 21.

    & Abnormal neural oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 100–113 (2010).

  22. 22.

    et al. Abnormal task driven neural oscillations in multiple sclerosis: A visuomotor MEG study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 2441–2453 (2017).

  23. 23.

    et al. Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging. Neuroimage 39, 1788–1802 (2008).

  24. 24.

    , , & Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44, 867–880 (1997)

  25. 25.

    & Novel gradient coils designed using a boundary element method. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part B Magn. Reson. Eng. 31, 162–175 (2007)

  26. 26.

    , , & Design and evaluation of shielded gradient coils. Magn. Reson. Med. 26, 191–206 (1992).

  27. 27.

    Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 327–339 (2017).

  28. 28.

    et al. Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16783–16788 (2011).

  29. 29.

    , , , & Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 884–890 (2012).

  30. 30.

    . et al. Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7676–7681 (2007)

  31. 31.

    Analytical design method of shelf shielded planar coils. J. Appl. Phys. 67, 4349 (1990)

  32. 32.

    & Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Methods 25, 249–271 (2001).

  33. 33.

    & in Recent Advances in Biomagnetism (eds et al.) 302–305 (Tohoku Univ. Press, 1998)

  34. 34.

    & The resolving power of gross Earth data. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 16, 169–205 (1968)

  35. 35.

    Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 32, 11–22 (1987)

Download references


This study was funded by a Wellcome Collaborative Award in Science (203257/Z/16/Z and 203257/B/16/Z) awarded to G.R.B., R.B. and M.J.B. We also acknowledge the UK Quantum Technology Hub for Sensors and Metrology, funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013294/1). We acknowledge Medical Research Council Grants (MR/K005464/1 and MR/M006301/1). The Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging is supported by core funding from Wellcome (203147/Z/16/Z). OPM sensor development at QuSpin was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R44HD074495 and R44MH110288. The scanner-casts were designed and manufactured by M. Lim at Chalk Studios.

Author information

Author notes

    • Elena Boto
    • , Niall Holmes
    • , James Leggett
    •  & Gillian Roberts

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • Gareth R. Barnes
    • , Richard Bowtell
    •  & Matthew J. Brookes

    These authors jointly supervised this work.


  1. Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

    • Elena Boto
    • , Niall Holmes
    • , James Leggett
    • , Gillian Roberts
    • , Karen J. Mullinger
    • , Richard Bowtell
    •  & Matthew J. Brookes
  2. QuSpin Inc., 331 South 104th Street, Suite 130, Louisville, Colorado 80027, USA

    • Vishal Shah
  3. Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK

    • Sofie S. Meyer
    • , Leonardo Duque Muñoz
    • , Tim M. Tierney
    • , Sven Bestmann
    •  & Gareth R. Barnes
  4. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17–19 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, UK

    • Sofie S. Meyer
  5. Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

    • Karen J. Mullinger
  6. Sobell Department for Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square House, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK

    • Sven Bestmann


  1. Search for Elena Boto in:

  2. Search for Niall Holmes in:

  3. Search for James Leggett in:

  4. Search for Gillian Roberts in:

  5. Search for Vishal Shah in:

  6. Search for Sofie S. Meyer in:

  7. Search for Leonardo Duque Muñoz in:

  8. Search for Karen J. Mullinger in:

  9. Search for Tim M. Tierney in:

  10. Search for Sven Bestmann in:

  11. Search for Gareth R. Barnes in:

  12. Search for Richard Bowtell in:

  13. Search for Matthew J. Brookes in:


E.B.: system design and fabrication, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing paper. N.H.: system design and fabrication, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing paper. J.L.: system design and fabrication, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing paper. G.R.: system design and fabrication, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing paper. V.S.: system design and fabrication. S.S.M.: data interpretation, writing paper. L.D.M.: data interpretation, writing paper. K.J.M.: data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing paper. T.M.T.: data interpretation, writing paper. S.B.: data collection, data interpretation, writing paper. G.R.B.: conceptualization, system design and fabrication, data interpretation, writing paper. R.B.: conceptualization, system design and fabrication, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing paper. M.J.B.: conceptualization, system design and fabrication, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing paper.

Competing interests

V.S. is the founding director of QuSpin, the commercial entity selling OPM magnetometers. QuSpin built the sensors used here and advised on the system design and operation, but played no part in the subsequent measurements or data analysis. This work was funded by a Wellcome award which involves a collaboration agreement with QuSpin.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Brookes.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks S. Baillet and R. Leahy for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Life Sciences Reporting Summary

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains: Trial-by-trial analysis of data; Spatiotemporal resolution and orientation robustness analysis; Evoked response analysis; Methods for OPM calibration to account for background fields; Discussion of the field nulling coil system; OPM MEG versus EEG comparison; Example applications in the measurement of brain connectivity; Simulation and experimental measurements of crosstalk between OPM sensors; Reduction of interference from muscle artifacts and Supplementary equipment schematics.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.