Letter | Published:

Global elevational diversity and diversification of birds

Nature volume 555, pages 246250 (08 March 2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Mountain ranges harbour exceptionally high biodiversity, which is now under threat from rapid environmental change. However, despite decades of effort, the limited availability of data and analytical tools has prevented a robust and truly global characterization of elevational biodiversity gradients and their evolutionary origins1,2. This has hampered a general understanding of the processes involved in the assembly and maintenance of montane communities2,3,4. Here we show that a worldwide mid-elevation peak in bird richness is driven by wide-ranging species and disappears when we use a subsampling procedure that ensures even species representation in space and facilitates evolutionary interpretation. Instead, richness corrected for range size declines linearly with increasing elevation. We find that the more depauperate assemblages at higher elevations are characterized by higher rates of diversification across all mountain regions, rejecting the idea that lower recent diversification rates are the general cause of less diverse biota. Across all elevations, assemblages on mountains with high rates of past temperature change exhibit more rapid diversification, highlighting the importance of climatic fluctuations in driving the evolutionary dynamics of mountain biodiversity. While different geomorphological and climatic attributes of mountain regions have been pivotal in determining the remarkable richness gradients observed today, our results underscore the role of ongoing and often very recent diversification processes in maintaining the unique and highly adapted biodiversity of higher elevations.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Global gradients in vertebrate diversity predicted by historical area-productivity dynamics and contemporary environment. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001292 (2012)

  2. 2.

    Global analysis of bird elevational diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 346–360 (2009)

  3. 3.

    The relationship among area, elevation, and regional species richness in neotropical birds. Am. Nat. 149, 875–902 (1997)

  4. 4.

    et al. The origin and maintenance of montane diversity: integrating evolutionary and ecological processes. Ecography 37, 711–719 (2014)

  5. 5.

    et al. Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds. Nature 509, 222–225 (2014)

  6. 6.

    Distribution on environmental gradients: theory and a preliminary interpretation of distributional patterns in the avifauna of the Cordillera Vilcabamba, Peru. Ecology 52, 23–40 (1971)

  7. 7.

    , , & Scale effects and human impact on the elevational species richness gradients. Nature 453, 216–219 (2008)

  8. 8.

    et al. A global inventory of mountains for bio-geographical applications. Alp. Bot. 127, 1–15 (2016)

  9. 9.

    & Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13384–13389 (2007)

  10. 10.

    & Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297, 1548–1551 (2002)

  11. 11.

    & The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 70–76 (2000)

  12. 12.

    & Niche conservatism drives elevational diversity patterns in Appalachian salamanders. Am. Nat. 176, 40–54 (2010)

  13. 13.

    , , & How diversification rates and diversity limits combine to create large-scale species-area relationships. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 366, 2514–2525 (2011)

  14. 14.

    et al. Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84, 3105–3117 (2003)

  15. 15.

    et al. Horizontal and elevational phylogeographic patterns of Himalayan and Southeast Asian forest passerines (Aves: Passeriformes). J. Biogeogr. 39, 556–573 (2012)

  16. 16.

    et al. Goldilocks meets Santa Rosalia: an ephemeral speciation model explains patterns of diversification across time scales. Evol. Biol. 39, 255–261 (2012)

  17. 17.

    , , , & The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012)

  18. 18.

    , & A definition of mountains and their bioclimatic belts for global comparisons of biodiversity data. Alp. Bot. 121, 73–78 (2011)

  19. 19.

    , , , & New insights into New World biogeography: an integrated view from the phylogeny of blackbirds, cardinals, sparrows, tanagers, warblers, and allies. Auk 132, 333–348 (2015)

  20. 20.

    et al. The drivers of tropical speciation. Nature 515, 406–409 (2014)

  21. 21.

    & Speciation has a spatial scale that depends on levels of gene flow. Am. Nat. 175, 316–334 (2010)

  22. 22.

    & The uncertain role of diversity dependence in species diversification and the need to incorporate time-varying carrying capacities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150217 (2016)

  23. 23.

    , & in Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives (Univ. Chicago Press, 1993)

  24. 24.

    & Explaining species richness from continents to communities: the time-for-speciation effect in emydid turtles. Am. Nat. 161, 112–128 (2003)

  25. 25.

    Ecological and evolutionary drivers of geographic variation in species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 369–392 (2015)

  26. 26.

    Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. Am. Nat. 101, 233–249 (1967)

  27. 27.

    et al. Latitude, elevational climatic zonation and speciation in New World vertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 194–201 (2012)

  28. 28.

    The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405, 907–913 (2000)

  29. 29.

    , , & Transverse alpine speciation driven by glaciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 916–926 (2016)

  30. 30.

    & The latitudinal gradient in recent speciation and extinction rates of birds and mammals. Science 315, 1574–1576 (2007)

  31. 31.

    , & The Great American Biotic Interchange in birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21737–21742 (2009)

  32. 32.

    , , , & A latitudinal phylogeographic diversity gradient in birds. PLoS Biol. 15, e2001073 (2017)

  33. 33.

    & Parameter-expanded data augmentation for Bayesian analysis of capture–recapture models. J. Ornithol. 152, 521–537 (2012)

  34. 34.

    & Applied Hierarchical Models in Ecology (Academic, 2015)

  35. 35.

    JAGS: A Program for Analysis of Bayesian Graphical Models using Gibbs Sampling (2003)

  36. 36.

    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015)

  37. 37.

    & Numerical Ecology (Elsevier, 2012)

  38. 38.

    , & EarthEnv-DEM90: A nearly-global, void-free, multi-scale smoothed, 90m digital elevation model from fused ASTER and SRTM data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 87, 57–67 (2014)

  39. 39.

    & Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972–976 (2007)

  40. 40.

    , & apcluster: Affinity Propagation Clustering (2013)

  41. 41.

    , & Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biol. 5, e157 (2007)

  42. 42.

    , , , & (eds.). Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive (Lynx Edicions, 2015)

  43. 43.

    , & in Statistical Models in S (eds. & ) (Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, 1992)

  44. 44.

    , & Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 151–159 (2012)

  45. 45.

    & Species richness estimation of bird communities: how to control for sampling effort? Ibis 143, 413–419 (2001)

  46. 46.

    , , & Bayesian computing with INLA: New features. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 67, 68–83 (2013)

  47. 47.

    & raster: Geographic Analysis and Modeling with raster. Data (Kbh.) (2012)

  48. 48.

    , & rgdal: Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library (2015)

  49. 49.

    & rjags: Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC (2013)

  50. 50.

    , & Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Stat. Comput. 24, 997–1016 (2014)

  51. 51.

    , & Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 71, 319–392 (2009)

  52. 52.

    , & Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. Science 288, 2349–2350 (2000)

  53. 53.

    Automatic detection of key innovations, rate shifts, and diversity-dependence on phylogenetic trees. PLoS One 9, e89543 (2014)

  54. 54.

    et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004)

  55. 55.

    , , & A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas. Clim. Res. 21, 1–25 (2002)

  56. 56.

    et al. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526, 569–573 (2015)

  57. 57.

    , , , & Simulating Arctic climate warmth and icefield retreat in the last interglaciation. Science 311, 1751–1753 (2006)

  58. 58.

    , & An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012)

  59. 59.

    , , , & Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. E. Ricklefs, P. V. A. Fine, T. Price, C. D. Cadena, J. Beck, E. Spriggs, N. Upham and R. Freckleton for manuscript comments; members of the Future Earth Global Mountain Biodiversity Assessment, including C. Körner, E. Spehn, M. Fischer, and D. Payne for feedback; B. Klempay, A. Houston and A. Ranipeta for help collecting the elevational data; and the ‘Monitoring Häufige Brutvögel (MBH)’ project of the Vogelwarte Sempach (M. Kery) for sharing data on the Swiss breeding bird survey from 2007. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output. This material is based upon work supported by NSF grants DGE-1122492, DEB-1441737, and DBI-1262600.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

    • Ignacio Quintero
    •  & Walter Jetz
  2. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK

    • Walter Jetz

Authors

  1. Search for Ignacio Quintero in:

  2. Search for Walter Jetz in:

Contributions

I.Q. and W.J. designed the research and wrote the manuscript. I.Q. conducted the analyses.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Quintero.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks A. Antonelli and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Life Sciences Reporting Summary

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text, Supplementary references and Supplementary Figures 1-46.

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

    Elevational ranges for each species for each mountain range they inhabit. The fields are: Species, following the taxonomy of (Jetz et al. 2012); Country, specifies, for Andean species only (i.e., Mountain ID 404), which country the elevational range corresponds to; Mountain ID, specifies the mountain system the elevational range corresponds to (Mountain ID can be matched with the name in Table S3); Minimum Elevation and Maximum Elevation, corresponds to the elevational range used in this study; Source and Notes, species-specific references and, sometimes, specific decisions for certain elevational ranges.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Table 2

    Field surveys along elevation we used to compare and validate the assemblage richness data (Extended Data Fig. 3). The fields are: ID, the ID of each independent elevational transect; N_sites, number of localities where species richness was assessed; min_ele and max_ele, the elevational extent of the survey; Effort_months, an approximate measure of time spent in the filed during the survey (in months); Bird Group, the focal subset of bird species surveyed, ALL = all species, F = Forest species, B = breeding species only; Locality; Country; Reference; Notes, transect specific notes for some of the surveys.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Table 3

    Compilation of mountain ranges uplift times from the literature. The fields are: Continent; Mountain ID, specifies the mountain system; Mountain Range, specifies the mountain range the Mountain ID corresponds to; Uplift Ages, the first pulse of uplift (Start) and the most recent one (Last) and other significant ones in between (Other significant); Notes, specific notes related to the information compiles; Reference, numeric correspondence with the articles below where the information was obtained.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Table 4

    Specific Global Climate Models and Modeling groups used in this study.

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Table 5

    Cross tables summarizing parameter changes from the sensitivity analyses.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25794

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.