Letter | Published:

A single population of red globular clusters around the massive compact galaxy NGC 1277

Nature volume 555, pages 483486 (22 March 2018) | Download Citation


Massive galaxies are thought to form in two phases: an initial collapse of gas and giant burst of central star formation, followed by the later accretion of material that builds up their stellar and dark-matter haloes1,2,3,4. The systems of globular clusters within such galaxies are believed to form in a similar manner. The initial central burst forms metal-rich (spectrally red) clusters, whereas more metal-poor (spectrally blue) clusters are brought in by the later accretion of less-massive satellites5,6,7,8,9,10. This formation process is thought to result in the multimodal optical colour distributions that are seen in the globular cluster systems of massive galaxies8,11,12. Here we report optical observations of the massive relic-galaxy candidate NGC 1277—a nearby, un-evolved example of a high-redshift ‘red nugget’ galaxy13,14,15,16,17. We find that the optical colour distribution of the cluster system of NGC 1277 is unimodal and entirely red. This finding is in strong contrast to other galaxies of similar and larger stellar mass, the cluster systems of which always exhibit (and are generally dominated by) blue clusters11. We argue that the colour distribution of the cluster system of NGC 1277 indicates that the galaxy has undergone little (if any) mass accretion after its initial collapse, and use simulations of possible merger histories to show that the stellar mass due to accretion is probably at most ten per cent of the total stellar mass of the galaxy. These results confirm that NGC 1277 is a genuine relic galaxy and demonstrate that blue clusters constitute an accreted population in present-day massive galaxies.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & A simple model for the size evolution of elliptical galaxies. Astrophys. J. 648, L21–L24 (2006)

  2. 2.

    ., ., . & The cosmological size and velocity dispersion evolution of massive early-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. 744, 63 (2012)

  3. 3.

    ., ., & Early formation of massive, compact, spheroidal galaxies with classical profiles by violent disc instability or mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 3291–3310 (2015)

  4. 4.

    . et al. The growth of massive galaxies since z=2. Astrophys. J. 709, 1018–1041 (2010)

  5. 5.

    & Compositions of halo clusters and the formation of the galactic halo. Astrophys. J. 225, 357–379 (1978)

  6. 6.

    ., & The formation of giant elliptical galaxies and their globular cluster systems. Astrophys. J. 501, 554–570 (1998)

  7. 7.

    ., ., ., & On the formation of globular cluster systems in a hierarchical Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 333, 383–399 (2002)

  8. 8.

    The metallicity bimodality of globular cluster systems: a test of galaxy assembly and of the evolution of the galaxy mass-metallicity relation. Astrophys. J. 762, 39 (2013)

  9. 9.

    ., & The bifurcated age–metallicity relation of Milky Way globular clusters and its implications for the accretion history of the galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 122–135 (2013)

  10. 10.

    Globular clusters as the relics of regular star formation in normal high-redshift galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 1658–1686 (2015)

  11. 11.

    . et al. The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey. IX. The color distributions of globular cluster systems in early-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. 639, 95–119 (2006)

  12. 12.

    & Extragalactic globular clusters and galaxy formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 193–267 (2006)

  13. 13.

    . et al. Red nuggets at z=1.5. Compact passive galaxies and the formation of the Kormendy relation. Astrophys. J. 695, 101–115 (2009)

  14. 14.

    . et al. An over-massive black hole in the compact lenticular galaxy NGC 1277. Nature 491, 729–731 (2012)

  15. 15.

    ., ., ., & NGC 1277: a massive compact relic galaxy in the nearby Universe. Astrophys. J. 780, L20 (2014)

  16. 16.

    . et al. The initial mass function of a massive relic galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 1081–1089 (2015)

  17. 17.

    . et al. The structural and dynamical properties of compact elliptical galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 4216–4245 (2017)

  18. 18.

    & Globular cluster systems and their host galaxies: comparison of spatial distributions and colors. Astrophys. J. 796, 62 (2014)

  19. 19.

    . et al. Optical and infrared photometry of globular clusters in NGC 1399: evidence for color–metallicity nonlinearity. Astrophys. J. 746, 88 (2012)

  20. 20.

    . et al. Nonlinear color-metallicity relations of globular clusters. III. On the discrepancy in metallicity between globular cluster systems and their parent elliptical galaxies. Astrophys. J. 743, 150 (2011)

  21. 21.

    . et al. An optical/NIR survey of globular clusters in early-type galaxies. III. On the colour bimodality of globular cluster systems. Astron. Astrophys. 539, A54 (2012)

  22. 22.

    ., ., ., & The tidal stripping of satellites. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 366, 429–437 (2006)

  23. 23.

    ., & Sizes and surface brightness profiles of quiescent galaxies at z=2. Astrophys. J. 749, 121 (2012)

  24. 24.

    . et al. MRK 1216 and NGC 1277 – an orbit-based dynamical analysis of compact, high-velocity dispersion galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 1792–1816 (2015)

  25. 25.

    . et al. A massive, dead disk galaxy in the early Universe. Nature 546, 510–513 (2017)

  26. 26.

    . et al. The diverse evolutionary paths of simulated high-z massive, compact galaxies to z=0. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456, 1030–1048 (2016)

  27. 27.

    . et al. Size evolution of normal and compact galaxies in the EAGLE simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 722–738 (2017)

  28. 28.

    & Modeling the metallicity distribution of globular clusters. Astrophys. J. 718, 1266–1288 (2010)

  29. 29.

    & SExtractor: software for source extraction. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 117, 393–404 (1996)

  30. 30.

    Automated morphometry with SExtractor and PSFEx. ASP Conf. Ser. 442, 435–438 (2011)

  31. 31.

    . & Measuring reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey stellar spectra and recalibrating SFD. Astrophys. J. 737, 103 (2011)

  32. 32.

    Perfecting the photometric calibration of the ACS CCD cameras. Astron. J. 152, 60 (2016)

  33. 33.

    Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization 7–11 (John Wiley & Sons, 1992)

  34. 34.

    et al. The SLUGGS survey: kinematics for over 2500 globular clusters in 12 early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 428, 389–420 (2013)

  35. 35.

    The influence of the atmospheric and instrumental dispersion on the brightness distribution in a galaxy. Bol. Asoc. Argentina Astron. 6, 41–43 (1963)

  36. 36.

    et al. A database of Cepheid distance moduli and tip of the red giant branch, globular cluster luminosity function, planetary nebula luminosity function, and surface brightness fluctuation data useful for distance determinations. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 128, 431–459 (2000)

  37. 37.

    & A maximum likelihood analysis of globular cluster luminosity distributions in the Virgo ellipticals. Astron. J. 105, 1358–1368 (1993)

  38. 38.

    et al. The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey. XII. The luminosity function of globular clusters in early-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 171, 101–145 (2007)

  39. 39.

    et al. The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey. XV. The formation efficiencies of globular clusters in early-type galaxies: the effects of mass and environment. Astrophys. J. 681, 197–224 (2008)

  40. 40.

    et al. Globular cluster systems in brightest cluster galaxies. bimodal metallicity distributions and the nature of the high-luminosity clusters. Astrophys. J. 636, 90–114 (2006)

  41. 41.

    , , & Globular clusters in Virgo ellipticals: unexpected results for giants and dwarfs from advanced camera for surveys imaging. Astron. J. 132, 2333–2345 (2006)

  42. 42.

    et al. The ACS Fornax Cluster Survey. IX. The color–magnitude relation of globular cluster systems. Astrophys. J. 710, 1672–1682 (2010)

  43. 43.

    et al. Superdense galaxies and the mass-size relation at low redshift. Astrophys. J. 762, 77 (2013)

  44. 44.

    et al. Superdense massive galaxies in wings local clusters. Astrophys. J. 712, 226–237 (2010)

  45. 45.

    , , , & Massive relic galaxies prefer dense environments. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 156–163 (2016)

  46. 46.

    , , & The environment of massive quiescent compact galaxies at 0.1<z<0.4 in the COSMOS field. Astrophys. J. 815, 104 (2015)

  47. 47.

    , , & A cosmological context for compact massive galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 449, 2396–2404 (2015)

  48. 48.

    et al. Superdense Massive Galaxies in the Nearby Universe. Astrophys. J. 692, L118–L122 (2009)

  49. 49.

    et al. On the dearth of compact, massive, red sequence galaxies in the local Universe. Astrophys. J. 720, 723–741 (2010)

  50. 50.

    et al. New constraints on the evolution of the stellar- to-dark matter connection: a combined analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing, clustering, and stellar mass functions from z=0.2 to z=1. Astrophys. J. 744, 159 (2012)

  51. 51.

    et al. The Universal stellar mass-stellar metallicity relation for dwarf galaxies. Astrophys. J. 779, 102 (2013)

  52. 52.

    , , & Globular cluster systems in nearby dwarf galaxies – III. Formation efficiencies of old globular clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406, 1967–1984 (2010)

Download references


We thank C. dalla Vecchia, J. Sanchez Almeida, C. Brook, S. Wellons, M. Fouesneau, A. Vazdekis, B. Dullo, J. Read and G. van de Ven for discussions, and J. Roman and A. Serrano Borlaf for assistance with image alignment. M.A.B. and I.T. acknowledge support from grant AYA2016-77237-C3-1-P from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO). R.L. acknowledges funding from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada PDF award. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with NASA, and is based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with programme GO-14215. Support for this work was provided by NASA through grant HST-GO-4215 from the Space Telescope Science Institute, operated by AURA under NASA contract NAS 5-26555 This research has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System and extensive use of Python and Scipy.

Author information


  1. Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Calle Vía Láctea, La Laguna, Spain

    • Michael A. Beasley
    •  & Ignacio Trujillo
  2. University of La Laguna, Avenida Astrofísico Francisco. Sánchez, La Laguna, Spain

    • Michael A. Beasley
    •  & Ignacio Trujillo
  3. Max-Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany

    • Ryan Leaman
  4. Department of Astronomy, Yale University, 06511 New Haven, Connecticut, USA

    • Mireia Montes


  1. Search for Michael A. Beasley in:

  2. Search for Ignacio Trujillo in:

  3. Search for Ryan Leaman in:

  4. Search for Mireia Montes in:


M.A.B. led the data processing and analysis, contributed to the interpretation and HST proposal preparation and produced Figs 1, 2, 3 and Extended Data Figs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. I.T. contributed to the analysis and the interpretation, produced Extended Data Fig. 1 and lead the HST proposal preparation. R.L. generated and analysed the analytic merger models, produced Fig. 4 and Extended Data Figs 7, 8, and contributed to the analysis, interpretation and HST proposal preparation. M.M. contributed to the analysis, interpretation and HST proposal preparation. All authors contributed to the overall design of this project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Beasley.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks R. Abraham, K. Glazebrook and L. Spitler for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history







By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.