Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Large emissions from floodplain trees close the Amazon methane budget

Nature volume 552, pages 230–234 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 December 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Wetlands are the largest global source of atmospheric methane (CH4)1, a potent greenhouse gas. However, methane emission inventories from the Amazon floodplain2,3, the largest natural geographic source of CH4 in the tropics, consistently underestimate the atmospheric burden of CH4 determined via remote sensing and inversion modelling4,5, pointing to a major gap in our understanding of the contribution of these ecosystems to CH4 emissions. Here we report CH4 fluxes from the stems of 2,357 individual Amazonian floodplain trees from 13 locations across the central Amazon basin. We find that escape of soil gas through wetland trees is the dominant source of regional CH4 emissions. Methane fluxes from Amazon tree stems were up to 200 times larger than emissions reported for temperate wet forests6 and tropical peat swamp forests7, representing the largest non-ebullitive wetland fluxes observed. Emissions from trees had an average stable carbon isotope value (δ13C) of −66.2 ± 6.4 per mil, consistent with a soil biogenic origin. We estimate that floodplain trees emit 15.1 ± 1.8 to 21.2 ± 2.5 teragrams of CH4 a year, in addition to the 20.5 ± 5.3 teragrams a year emitted regionally from other sources. Furthermore, we provide a ‘top-down’ regional estimate of CH4 emissions of 42.7 ± 5.6 teragrams of CH4 a year for the Amazon basin, based on regular vertical lower-troposphere CH4 profiles covering the period 2010–2013. We find close agreement between our ‘top-down’ and combined ‘bottom-up’ estimates, indicating that large CH4 emissions from trees adapted to permanent or seasonal inundation can account for the emission source that is required to close the Amazon CH4 budget. Our findings demonstrate the importance of tree stem surfaces in mediating approximately half of all wetland CH4 emissions in the Amazon floodplain, a region that represents up to one-third of the global wetland CH4 source when trees are combined with other emission sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Sampling site locations and CH4 flux distributions.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 13 December 2017

    Please see accompanying Erratum (http://doi.org/10.1038/nature25191). In this Letter, author ‘Humberto Ribeiro’ has been corrected to ‘Humberto Marotta’, and the Acknowledgements and Author Contributions have been corrected accordingly.

References

  1. Kirschke, S. et al. Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat. Geosci. 6, 813–823 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom, A. A., Palmer, P. I., Fraser, A. & Reay, D. S. Seasonal variability of tropical wetland CH4 emissions: the role of the methanogen-available carbon pool. Biogeosciences 9, 2821–2830 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Melack, J. M. et al. Regionalization of methane emissions in the Amazon Basin with microwave remote sensing. Glob. Change Biol. 10, 530–544 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergamaschi, P. et al. Inverse modeling of global and regional CH4 emissions using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals. J. Geophys. Res. D 114, (2009)

  5. Frankenberg, C. et al. Pressure broadening in the 2 nu(3) band of methane and its implication on atmospheric retrievals. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 5061–5075 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pangala, S. R., Hornibrook, E. R. C., Gowing, D. J. & Gauci, V. The contribution of trees to ecosystem methane emissions in a temperate forested wetland. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2642–2654 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pangala, S. R., Moore, S., Hornibrook, E. R. C. & Gauci, V. Trees are major conduits for methane egress from tropical forested wetlands. New Phytol. 197, 524–531 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Devol, A. H., Richey, J. E., Forsberg, B. R. & Martinelli, L. A. Seasonal dynamics in methane emissions from the Amazon River floodplain to the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res. D 95, 16417–16426 (1990)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartlett, K. B. et al. Methane flux from the central Amazonian floodplain. J. Geophys. Res. D 93, 1571–1582 (1988)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ringeval, B. et al. Methane emissions from floodplains in the Amazon Basin: Challenges in developing a process-based model for global applications. Biogeosciences 11, 1519–1558 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Webb, A. J. et al. CH4 concentrations over the Amazon from GOSAT consistent with in situ vertical profile data. J. Geophys. Res. D 121, 11006–11020 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chou, W. W. et al. Net fluxes of CO2 in Amazonia derived from aircraft observations. J. Geophys. Res. D 107, (2002)

  13. Frankenberg, C., Meirink, J. F., van Weele, M., Platt, U. & Wagner, T. Assessing methane emissions from global space-borne observations. Science 308, 1010–1014 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bloom, A. A. et al. Global methane emission estimates from ultraviolet irradiation of terrestrial plant foliage. New Phytol. 187, 417–425 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martinson, G. O. et al. Methane emissions from tank bromeliads in neotropical forests. Nat. Geosci. 3, 766–769 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Beck, V. et al. Methane airborne measurements and comparison to global models during BARCA. J. Geophys. Res. D 117, (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rusch, H. & Rennenberg, H. Black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) trees mediate methane and nitrous oxide emission from the soil to the atmosphere. Plant Soil 201, 1–7 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pangala, S. R., Gowing, D. J., Hornibrook, E. R. C. & Gauci, V. Controls on methane emissions from Alnus glutinosa saplings. New Phytol. 201, 887–896 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sawakuchi, H. O. et al. Methane emissions from Amazonian Rivers and their contribution to the global methane budget. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2829–2840 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Belger, L., Forsberg, B. R. & Melack, J. M. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions from interfluvial wetlands in the upper Negro River basin, Brazil. Biogeochemistry 105, 171–183 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaefer, H. et al. A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by 13CH4 . Science 352, 80–84 (2016)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hess, L. L. et al. Wetlands of the lowland Amazon basin: extent, vegetative cover, and dual-season inundated area as mapped with JERS-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar. Wetlands 35, 745–756 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Covey, K. R., Wood, S. A., Warren, R. J., Lee, X. & Bradford, M. A. Elevated methane concentrations in trees of an upland forest. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, (2012)

  24. Pitz, S. & Megonigal, J. P. Temperate forest methane sink diminished by tree emissions. New Phytol. 214, 1432–1439 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Z. P. et al. Methane emissions from the trunks of living trees on upland soils. New Phytol. 211, 429–439 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson, C. et al. Contribution of regional sources to atmospheric methane over the Amazon Basin in 2010 and 2011. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 400–420 (2016)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Latrubesse, E. M. et al. Damming the rivers of the Amazon basin. Nature 546, 363–369 (2017)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hess, L. L., Melack, J. M., Novo, E., Barbosa, C. C. F. & Gastil, M. Dual-season mapping of wetland inundation and vegetation for the central Amazon basin. Remote Sens. Environ. 87, 404–428 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Siegenthaler, A., Welch, B., Pangala, S. R., Peacock, M. & Gauci, V. Semi-rigid chambers for methane gas flux measurements on tree stems. Biogeosciences 13, 1197–1207 (2016)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bastviken, D., Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L. & de Bogert, M. C. Fates of methane from different lake habitats: connecting whole-lake budgets and CH4 emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 113, G02024 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fisher, R., Lowry, D., Wilkin, O., Sriskantharajah, S. & Nisbet, E. G. High-precision, automated stable isotope analysis of atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide using continuous-flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 20, 200–208 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Keppler, F. et al. Measurements of 13C/12C methane from anaerobic digesters: comparison of optical spectroscopy with continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 5067–5073 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Santiago, L. S., Goldstein, G., Meinzer, F. C., Fownes, J. H. & Mueller-Dombois, D. Transpiration and forest structure in relation to soil waterlogging in a Hawaiian montane cloud forest. Tree Physiol. 20, 673–681 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Melack, J. M . et al. Monthly mean flooded wetlands habitat, Central Amazon Basin : 1979–1996. LBA-ECO LC-07(Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, 2011); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1049.

  35. Miller, J. B. et al. Airborne measurements indicate large methane emissions from the eastern Amazon basin. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L10809 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Draxler, R. R. & Hess, G. D. An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modelling system for trajectories, dispersion, and deposition. Aust. Meteorol. Mag. 47, 295–308 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The bottom-up measurement study was funded by grants from the following bodies: UK Natural Environment Research Council to V.G. (Principal Investigator, grant NE/J010928/1) and E.R.C.H. (co-investigator, NE/J009032/1); several CNPq (Brazil National Council of Research and Development) and FAPERJ (Science Foundation from the State of Rio de Janeiro) grants to A.E.-P.; Swedish Research Council, VR (grant 2012-00048) to D.B.; and the Swedish-Brazilian collaboration STINT/CAPES to D.B. and A.E.-P. (grant 2012-2085). Atmospheric CH4 vertical profile measurements were funded by the following agencies: NERC consortium AMAZONICA, which is led by E.G. (grant NE/F005806/1) and includes L.V.G. and J.B.M.; FAPESP (State of Sao Paulo Science Foundation) via the Carbon Tracker project and FAPESP-NERC via the ACO project (grants 08/58120-3, 11/51841-0); the EU via the 7th-Framework Programme project GEOCARBON (grant 283080); and CNPq (grant 403241/2012-3, awarded to L.V.G.). NASA, NOAA, IPEN and INPE contributed to the construction and maintenance of the GHG laboratory in Brazil. We also acknowledge support from the FAPESP-NERC ACO project for a workshop that brought bottom-up and top-down data together. V.G. and E.G. thank the NERC consortium MOYA (grant NE/N015606/1) and D.B. thanks the Swedish Research Council (VR) for salary contributions. V.G. and S.R.P. acknowledge support from the AXA Research Fund. We thank T. Silva for assistance with tree species identification and A. Breves, E. Cristina, F. M. Silva, J. Valle, J. P. Felizardo, L. Rodrigues, L. Valladares, P. Souto, R. Pollery and V. Figueiredo for field work assistance. We thank A. Dwarakanath for data analysis and P. Monaghan and A. McAleer for performing δ13C-CH4 analyses.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sunitha R. Pangala

    Present address: Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK

    Sunitha R. Pangala & Vincent Gauci

  2. Department of Thematic Studies, Environmental Change, Linköping University, Linköping, SE-581 83, Sweden

    Alex Enrich-Prast & David Bastviken

  3. Department of Botany, Institute of Biology, University Federal of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Alex Enrich-Prast, Roberta Bittencourt Peixoto, Luana Silva Braucks Calazans & Cassia Mônica Sakuragui

  4. Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Comissao Nacional de Energia Nuclear (CNEN), Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory, 2242 Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, Cidade Universitaria, Sao Paulo, CEP 05508-000, Brazil

    Luana S. Basso & Luciana V. Gatti

  5. School of Earth Sciences, The University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen’s Road, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK

    Edward R. C. Hornibrook

  6. Department of Earth, Environmental and Geographic Sciences, Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 1177 Research Road, Kelowna, V1V 1V7, British Columbia, Canada

    Edward R. C. Hornibrook

  7. National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Center for Earth System Science (CCST), Greenhouse Gas Laboratory (LaGEE), Av. Dos Astronautas 1758, Sao Jose dos, CEP 12227-010, Campos, Brazil

    Luciana V. Gatti

  8. Ecosystems and Global Change Laboratory (LEMG-UFF)/International Laboratory of Global Change (LINCGlobal), Biomass and Water Management Research Center (NAB-UFF), Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Avenido Edmundo March, Niteroi/Rio de Janeiro, 24210-310, Brazil

    Humberto Marotta

  9. Department of Geography, Sedimentary and Environmental Processes Laboratory (LAPSA-UFF), Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Avenida General Milton Tavares de Souza, Niteroi/Rio de Janeiro, 24210-346, Brazil

    Humberto Marotta

  10. Environmental Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Federal University of Rondônia, Rondônia, Brazil

    Wanderley Rodrigues Bastos

  11. Radioisotopes Laboratory, Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Olaf Malm

  12. School of Geography, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS9 2JT, UK

    Emanuel Gloor

  13. Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 325 Broadway, Boulder, 80305, Colorado, USA

    John Bharat Miller

Authors
  1. Sunitha R. Pangala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex Enrich-Prast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luana S. Basso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roberta Bittencourt Peixoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Bastviken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Edward R. C. Hornibrook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Luciana V. Gatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Humberto Marotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Luana Silva Braucks Calazans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Cassia Mônica Sakuragui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wanderley Rodrigues Bastos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Olaf Malm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Emanuel Gloor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. John Bharat Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Vincent Gauci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.R.P., V.G., A.E.-P. and D.B. conceived and designed the bottom-up measurement study. The Brazil expeditions (bottom-up measurements) in 2013 and 2014 were planned and organised by A.E.-P., O.M., W.R.B., R.B.P. and S.R.P. and carried out by S.R.P., R.B.P., H.M., L.S.B.C. and W.R.B. The δ13C-CH4 analysis was performed by E.R.C.H., who also interpreted those data. L.S.B.C. and C.M.S. identified the tree species in the 2014 Brazil expedition. The top-down measurement study was designed and carried out by L.S.B., L.V.G., J.B.M. and E.G. V.G. coordinated the integration of the various elements of the study. S.R.P., V.G., L.S.B., E.G., D.B., E.R.C.H. and A.E.-P. contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sunitha R. Pangala or Vincent Gauci.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks C. Frankenberg, F. Keppler, P. Megonigal and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-2 and Supplementary Tables 1-5. (PDF 1382 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pangala, S., Enrich-Prast, A., Basso, L. et al. Large emissions from floodplain trees close the Amazon methane budget. Nature 552, 230–234 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24639

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24639

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing