Letter | Published:

Ultra-selective looming detection from radial motion opponency

Nature volume 551, pages 237241 (09 November 2017) | Download Citation


Nervous systems combine lower-level sensory signals to detect higher-order stimulus features critical to survival1,2,3, such as the visual looming motion created by an imminent collision or approaching predator4. Looming-sensitive neurons have been identified in diverse animal species5,6,7,8,9. Different large-scale visual features such as looming often share local cues, which means loom-detecting neurons face the challenge of rejecting confounding stimuli. Here we report the discovery of an ultra-selective looming detecting neuron, lobula plate/lobula columnar, type II (LPLC2)10 in Drosophila, and show how its selectivity is established by radial motion opponency. In the fly visual system, directionally selective small-field neurons called T4 and T5 form a spatial map in the lobula plate, where they each terminate in one of four retinotopic layers, such that each layer responds to motion in a different cardinal direction11,12,13. Single-cell anatomical analysis reveals that each arm of the LPLC2 cross-shaped primary dendrites ramifies in one of these layers and extends along that layer’s preferred motion direction. In vivo calcium imaging demonstrates that, as their shape predicts, individual LPLC2 neurons respond strongly to outward motion emanating from the centre of the neuron’s receptive field. Each dendritic arm also receives local inhibitory inputs directionally selective for inward motion opposing the excitation. This radial motion opponency generates a balance of excitation and inhibition that makes LPLC2 non-responsive to related patterns of motion such as contraction, wide-field rotation or luminance change. As a population, LPLC2 neurons densely cover visual space and terminate onto the giant fibre descending neurons, which drive the jump muscle motor neuron to trigger an escape take off. Our findings provide a mechanistic description of the selective feature detection that flies use to discern and escape looming threats.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Summation and inhibition in the frog’s retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 119, 69–88 (1953)

  2. 2.

    ., ., & What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 47, 1940–1951 (1959)

  3. 3.

    & Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106–154 (1962)

  4. 4.

    Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. Br. J. Psychol. 49, 182–194 (1958)

  5. 5.

    & The anatomy and output connection of a locust visual interneurone; the lobular giant movement detector (LGMD) neurone. J. Comp. Physiol. A 91, 257–266 (1974)

  6. 6.

    & Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons. Nature 356, 236–238 (1992)

  7. 7.

    & Loom-sensitive neurons link computation to action in the Drosophila visual system. Curr. Biol. 22, 353–362 (2012)

  8. 8.

    et al. Neural circuits underlying visually evoked escapes in larval zebrafish. Neuron 89, 613–628 (2016)

  9. 9.

    & Comparative approaches to escape. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 41, 167–173 (2016)

  10. 10.

    et al. Visual projection neurons in the Drosophila lobula link feature detection to distinct behavioral programs. eLife 5, e21022 (2016)

  11. 11.

    et al. A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors. Nature 500, 212–216 (2013)

  12. 12.

    et al. A visual motion detection circuit suggested by Drosophila connectomics. Nature 500, 175–181 (2013)

  13. 13.

    & The optic lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. I. A Golgi analysis of wild-type structure. Cell Tissue Res. 258, 441–475 (1989)

  14. 14.

    et al. A spike-timing mechanism for action selection. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 962–970 (2014)

  15. 15.

    et al. Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations. Nat. Methods 11, 338–346 (2014)

  16. 16.

    , & Optimized tools for multicolor stochastic labeling reveal diverse stereotyped cell arrangements in the fly visual system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E2967–E2976 (2015)

  17. 17.

    & Local motion detectors are required for the computation of expansion flow-fields. Biol. Open 4, 1105–1108 (2015)

  18. 18.

    et al. Two-photon calcium imaging from head-fixed Drosophila during optomotor walking behavior. Nat. Methods 7, 535–540 (2010)

  19. 19.

    et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013)

  20. 20.

    et al. The emergence of directional selectivity in the visual motion pathway of Drosophila. Neuron 94, 168–182 (2017)

  21. 21.

    et al. Neural circuit to integrate opposing motions in the visual field. Cell 162, 351–362 (2015)

  22. 22.

    , & The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. IV. The preference for small field stimuli. J. Exp. Biol. 68, 157–185 (1977)

  23. 23.

    , & Short- and long-range synchronous activities in dimming detectors of the frog retina. Vis. Neurosci. 16, 1001–1014 (1999)

  24. 24.

    et al. Approach sensitivity in the retina processed by a multifunctional neural circuit. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1308–1316 (2009)

  25. 25.

    , , & Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature 420, 320–324 (2002)

  26. 26.

    & Spike frequency adaptation mediates looming stimulus selectivity in a collision-detecting neuron. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 318–326 (2009)

  27. 27.

    & Synchronized neural input shapes stimulus selectivity in a collision-detecting neuron. Curr. Biol. 20, 2052–2057 (2010)

  28. 28.

    & The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res. 17, 205–242 (1970)

  29. 29.

    et al. Feature integration drives probabilistic behavior in the Drosophila escape response. Neuron 94, 1190–1204 (2017)

  30. 30.

    et al. A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell Reports 2, 991–1001 (2012)

  31. 31.

    et al. Genome-scale functional characterization of Drosophila developmental enhancers in vivo. Nature 512, 91–95 (2014)

  32. 32.

    et al. Refinement of tools for targeted gene expression in Drosophila. Genetics 186, 735–755 (2010)

  33. 33.

    , , & A neural command circuit for grooming movement control. eLife 4, e08758 (2015)

  34. 34.

    et al. The neuronal architecture of the mushroom body provides a logic for associative learning. eLife 3, e04577 (2014)

  35. 35.

    et al. Bruchpilot, a protein with homology to ELKS/CAST, is required for structural integrity and function of synaptic active zones in Drosophila. Neuron 49, 833–844 (2006)

  36. 36.

    et al. Axon patterning requires DN-cadherin, a novel neuronal adhesion receptor, in the Drosophila embryonic CNS. Neuron 19, 77–89 (1997)

  37. 37.

    , , , & V3D enables real-time 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of large-scale biological image data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 348–353 (2010)

  38. 38.

    , , & FluoRender: an application of 2D image space methods for 3D and 4D confocal microscopy data visualization in neurobiology research. In Proc. IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (eds , & ) 201–208 (IEEE, 2012)

  39. 39.

    , & Direct observation of ON and OFF pathways in the Drosophila visual system. Curr. Biol. 24, 976–983 (2014)

  40. 40.

    & Les phénoménes de pseudopupille dans l’oeil compose de Drosophila. Kybernetik 9, 159–182 (1971)

  41. 41.

    , & ScanImage: flexible software for operating laser scanning microscopes. Biomed. Eng. Online 2, 13 (2003)

  42. 42.

    , & Transformation of olfactory representations in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Science 303, 366–370 (2004)

  43. 43.

    , & Computation of object approach by a wide-field, motion-sensitive neuron. J. Neurosci. 19, 1122–1141 (1999)

  44. 44.

    , & NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012)

Download references


We thank the Janelia FlyLight Project Team for help with brain dissections, histology, and confocal imaging, Janelia Scientific Computing for image processing and data analysis tools, the Janelia FlyLight Project Team, M. Wu, and T. Ngo for help with split-GAL4 screening, H. Dionne for split-GAL4 molecular biology, and E. Gruntman for feedback on stimulus design. We thank Janelia Instrument Design and Fabrication and Vidrio Technologies for advice and help with the two-photon microscope setup. We thank S. Namiki and the Janelia Descending Interneuron Project for the empty split-GAL4 line. We also thank K. Svoboda, A. Chuong, and members of the Card and Reiser laboratories for discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information


  1. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA

    • Nathan C. Klapoetke
    • , Aljoscha Nern
    • , Martin Y. Peek
    • , Edward M. Rogers
    • , Patrick Breads
    • , Gerald M. Rubin
    • , Michael B. Reiser
    •  & Gwyneth M. Card


  1. Search for Nathan C. Klapoetke in:

  2. Search for Aljoscha Nern in:

  3. Search for Martin Y. Peek in:

  4. Search for Edward M. Rogers in:

  5. Search for Patrick Breads in:

  6. Search for Gerald M. Rubin in:

  7. Search for Michael B. Reiser in:

  8. Search for Gwyneth M. Card in:


N.C.K., A.N., M.B.R. and G.M.C. designed all experiments. A.N. carried out all anatomical characterizations. M.Y.P. performed electrophysiology. P.B. performed behaviour experiments. A.N. and G.M.R. generated the split-GAL4 lines. E.M.R. generated additional combination lines. N.C.K. performed all calcium imaging. All authors contributed to the writing.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michael B. Reiser or Gwyneth M. Card.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks T. Baden, H. Krapp and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Tables

    This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-3.

  2. 2.

    Life Sciences Reporting Summary


  1. 1.

    LPLC2 dendritic branching pattern in the lobula plate

    Rotating view of a single LPLC2 neuron showing branching pattern (same cell as Fig. 1d,e) on reference neuropil (grey, anti-Brp). Dendrites in each lobula plate layer are colored differently.

About this article

Publication history







By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.