Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Blazar spectral variability as explained by a twisted inhomogeneous jet


Blazars are active galactic nuclei, which are powerful sources of radiation whose central engine is located in the core of the host galaxy. Blazar emission is dominated by non-thermal radiation from a jet that moves relativistically towards us, and therefore undergoes Doppler beaming1. This beaming causes flux enhancement and contraction of the variability timescales, so that most blazars appear as luminous sources characterized by noticeable and fast changes in brightness at all frequencies. The mechanism that produces this unpredictable variability is under debate, but proposed mechanisms include injection, acceleration and cooling of particles2, with possible intervention of shock waves3,4 or turbulence5. Changes in the viewing angle of the observed emitting knots or jet regions have also been suggested as an explanation of flaring events6,7,8,9,10 and can also explain specific properties of blazar emission, such as intra-day variability11, quasi-periodicity12,13 and the delay of radio flux variations relative to optical changes14. Such a geometric interpretation, however, is not universally accepted because alternative explanations based on changes in physical conditions—such as the size and speed of the emitting zone, the magnetic field, the number of emitting particles and their energy distribution—can explain snapshots of the spectral behaviour of blazars in many cases15,16. Here we report the results of optical-to-radio-wavelength monitoring of the blazar CTA 102 and show that the observed long-term trends of the flux and spectral variability are best explained by an inhomogeneous, curved jet that undergoes changes in orientation over time. We propose that magnetohydrodynamic instabilities17 or rotation of the twisted jet6 cause different jet regions to change their orientation and hence their relative Doppler factors. In particular, the extreme optical outburst of 2016–2017 (brightness increase of six magnitudes) occurred when the corresponding emitting region had a small viewing angle. The agreement between observations and theoretical predictions can be seen as further validation of the relativistic beaming theory.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Observed optical light curve of CTA 102 in the last two observing seasons of the WEBT campaign.
Figure 2: Spectral energy distributions of CTA 102 and orientation of the emitting regions of the jet.
Figure 3: Multifrequency behaviour of the jet emission of CTA 102 in 2008–2017.
Figure 4: Schematic representation of the proposed inhomogeneous jet model.


  1. 1

    Blandford, R. D. & Königl, A. Relativistic jets as compact radio sources. Astrophys. J. 232, 34–48 (1979)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Ghisellini, G., Celotti, A. & Costamante, L. Low power BL Lacertae objects and the blazar sequence. Clues on the particle acceleration process. Astron. Astrophys. 386, 833–842 (2002)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Marscher, A. P. & Gear, W. K. Models for high-frequency radio outbursts in extragalactic sources, with application to the early 1983 millimeter-to-infrared flare of 3C 273. Astrophys. J. 298, 114–127 (1985)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Sikora, M., Błażejowski, M., Begelman, M. C. & Moderski, R. Modeling the production of flares in gamma-ray quasars. Astrophys. J. 554, 1–11 (2001)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Marscher, A. P. Turbulent, extreme multi-zone model for simulating flux and polarization variability in blazars. Astrophys. J. 780, 87 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Villata, M. & Raiteri, C. M. Helical jets in blazars I. The case of Mkn 501. Astron. Astrophys. 347, 30–36 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Marscher, A. P. et al. The inner jet of an active galactic nucleus as revealed by a radio-to-gamma-ray outburst. Nature 452, 966–969 (2008)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Abdo, A. A. et al. A change in the optical polarization associated with a γ-ray flare in the blazar 3C 279. Nature 463, 919–923 (2010)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Larionov, V. M. et al. Exceptional outburst of the blazar CTA 102 in 2012: the GASP-WEBT campaign and its extension. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 3047–3056 (2016)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Casadio, C. et al. A multi-wavelength polarimetric study of the blazar CTA 102 during a gamma-ray flare in 2012. Astrophys. J. 813, 51–64 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Camenzind, M. & Krockenberger, M. The lighthouse effect of relativistic jets in blazars. A geometric origin of intraday variability. Astron. Astrophys. 255, 59–62 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ostorero, L., Villata, M. & Raiteri, C. M. Helical jets in blazars. Interpretation of the multifrequency long-term variability of AO 0235+16. Astron. Astrophys. 419, 913–925 (2004)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Rieger, F. M. On the geometrical origin of periodicity in blazar-type sources. Astrophys. J. 615, L5–L8 (2004)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Villata, M. et al. The correlated optical and radio variability of BL Lacertae. WEBT data analysis 1994–2005. Astron. Astrophys. 501, 455–460 (2009)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Ghisellini, G. & Tavecchio, F. Canonical high-power blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 397, 985–1002 (2009)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Marcotulli, L. et al. High-redshift blazars through NuSTAR eyes. Astrophys. J. 839, 96 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Mignone, A., Rossi, P., Bodo, G., Ferrari, A. & Massaglia, S. High-resolution 3D relativistic MHD simulations of jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 402, 7–12 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Villata, M. et al. The unprecedented optical outburst of the quasar 3C 454.3. The WEBT campaign of 2004–2005. Astron. Astrophys. 453, 817–822 (2006)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Raiteri, C. M. et al. Infrared properties of blazars: putting the GASP-WEBT sources into context. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 442, 629–646 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Impey, C. D. & Neugebauer, G. Energy distributions of blazars. Astron. J. 95, 307–351 (1988)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Malmrose, M. P., Marscher, A. P., Jorstad, S. G., Nikutta, R. & Elitzur, M. Emission from hot dust in the infrared spectra of gamma-ray bright blazars. Astrophys. J. 732, 116 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Urry, C. M. & Padovani, P. Unified schemes for radio-loud active galactic nuclei. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 107, 803–845 (1995)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Savolainen, T. et al. Relativistic beaming and gamma-ray brightness of blazars. Astron. Astrophys. 512, A24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Fromm, C. M. et al. Catching the radio flare in CTA 102. III. Core-shift and spectral analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 557, A105 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Britzen, S. et al. A swirling jet in the quasar 1308+326. Astron. Astrophys. 602, A29 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Perucho, M., Kovalev, Y. Y., Lobanov, A. P., Hardee, P. E. & Agudo, I. Anatomy of helical extragalactic jets: the case of S5 0836+710. Astrophys. J. 749, 55 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Lyutikov, M. & Kravchenko, E. V. Polarization swings in blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 3876–3886 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Raiteri, C. M., Villata, M., Lanteri, L., Cavallone, M. & Sobrito, G. BVR photometry of comparison stars in selected blazar fields. II. Photometric sequences for 9 quasars. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 130, 495–500 (1998)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Doroshenko, V. T. et al. BVRI CCD-photometry of comparison stars in the fields of galaxies with active nuclei. V. Astrophysics 56, 343–358 (2013)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Jordi, K., Grebel, E. K. & Ammon, K. Empirical color transformations between SDSS photometry and other photometric systems. Astron. Astrophys. 460, 339–347 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Teräsranta, H. et al. Fifteen years monitoring of extragalctic radio sources at 22, 37 and 87 GHz. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 132, 305–331 (1998)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Agudo, I., Thum, C., Wiesemeyer, H. & Krichbaum, T. P. A. 3.5 mm polarimetric survey of radio-loud active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 189, 1–14 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Gurwell, M. A., Peck, A. B., Hostler, S. R., Darrah, M. R. & Katz, C. A. Monitoring phase calibrators at submillimeter wavelengths. In From Z-Machines to ALMA: (Sub)Millimeter Spectroscopy of Galaxies (ASP Conf. Ser. 375) (eds Baker, A. J. et al. ) 234–237 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2007)

  34. 34

    Larionov, V. M., Villata, M. & Raiteri, C. M. The nature of optical and near-infrared variability of BL Lacertae. Astron. Astrophys. 510, A93 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Massaro, E., Perri, M., Giommi, P. & Nesci, R. Log-parabolic spectra and particle acceleration in the BL Lac object Mkn 421: Spectral analysis of the complete BeppoSAX wide band X-ray data set. Astron. Astrophys. 413, 489–503 (2004)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Simonetti, J. H., Cordes, J. M. & Heeschen, D. S. Flicker of extragalactic radio sources at two frequencies. Astrophys. J. 296, 46–59 (1985)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Hufnagel, B. R. & Bregman, J. N. Optical and radio variability in blazars. Astrophys. J. 386, 473–484 (1992)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio, F. & Chiaberge, M. Structured jets in TeV BL Lac objects and radiogalaxies Implications for the observed properties. Astron. Astrophys. 432, 401–410 (2005)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Sikora, M., Rutkowski, M. & Begelman, M. C. A spine-sheath model for strong-line blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 1352–1358 (2016)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Tramacere, A., Giommi, P., Perri, M., Verrecchia, F. & Tosti, G. Swift observations of the very intense flaring activity of Mrk 421 during 2006. I. Phenomenological picture of electron acceleration and predictions for MeV/GeV emission. Astron. Astrophys. 501, 879–898 (2009)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The Acknowledgements are listed in the Supplementary Information.

Author information




C.M.R. and M.V. managed the WEBT observing campaign, analysed the data, developed the geometric interpretation and wrote the manuscript. J.A.A.-P., A.A.A., M.I.C., N.C.-S., N.V.E., A.D.P., A.G., C.L., F.P., C.P., F.J.R.-L. and G.R.-C. performed near-infrared and optical observations and the related data reduction. I.A., C.C., A.F., J.L.G. and S.N.M. performed photometric and polarimetric optical and radio observations and the related data reduction. E.B., J.E., C.E., T.S.G., D.H., S.G.J., M.J., E.N.K., V.M.L., E.G.L., L.V.L., M.P.M., A.P.M., R.M., A.A.M., J.W.M., D.A.M., S.S.S., Yu.V.T., I.S.T. and A.A.V. acquired and reduced optical photometric and polarimetric data. R.B., G.V.B., G.A.B., V.B., M.S.B., P.C., D.C., W.-P.C., G.D., Sh.A.E., H.J., B.J., K.K., O.M.K., S.O.K., C.S.L., K.M., B.McB., B.Mi., M.M., D.O.M., S.V.N., M.G.N., J.M.O., D.N.O., E.O., T.A.P., N.R., K.S., A.C.S., M.R.S., E.S., B.A.S., L.S.-M., I.A.S., A.S. and O.V. carried out optical observations and the related data reduction. M.A.G., A.L., J.T., C.T. and M.T. performed radio observations and the related data reduction. W.B. acquired and reduced optical spectra. T.P. made optical photometric and spectroscopic observations and the related data reduction. P.S.S. carried out optical photometric, polarimetric and spectroscopic observations and reduced the data. F.D. and all the above authors reviewed and contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to C. M. Raiteri or M. Villata.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Observed light curves of CTA 102 in the optical BVRI and near-infrared JHK bands.

The curves are built with data from 39 telescopes (marked with different symbols and colours) in 28 observatories participating in the WEBT project. Measurement errors (1 s.d.) are smaller than the symbol size.

Extended Data Figure 2 Four episodes of noticeable and well-sampled intranight variability.

Magnifications of the R-band light curve of Fig. 1 during the phases of the 2016–2017 optical outburst with the most dramatic changes reveal very fast brightness variations. Error bars represent 1 s.d. measurement errors.

Extended Data Figure 3 Colour behaviour of CTA 102.

a, The R-band light curve; red dots represent the data points used to build the colour indices. b–c, The B − R colour index as a function of time and R-band magnitude. Error bars were obtained by summing in quadrature the 1-s.d. measurement errors of the corresponding B and R data. The dashed line indicates the average BR value. The parameter α is the spectral index of the F να law. The redder-when-brighter trend that characterizes faint source states (R > 15) turns into a slight bluer-when-brighter trend as the source flux increases.

Extended Data Figure 4 Optical spectra of CTA 102 in different brightness states.

Data are from the Steward (blue) and Roque de los Muchachos (TNG and NOT; black and red, respectively) observatories and have been corrected for Galactic extinction. The observing epochs are given on the right, expressed in JD − 2,450,000. The main broad emission lines (more visible in faint states) are indicated. As the flux increases, the source spectrum first softens (redder-when-brighter trend) and then gradually hardens (bluer-when-brighter).

Extended Data Figure 5 Results of time-series analysis on the optical fluxes.

a, Structure function of R-band flux densities, corrected for the long-term trend due to variable relativistic beaming (see Fig. 3). b, Autocorrelation function of the same corrected fluxes. τ is the time separation between points, expressed in 1-day bins. Filled blue and empty red symbols refer to bright (more beamed) and faint (less beamed) observed states, respectively, and show that variation timescales are halved when the Doppler factor doubles.

Extended Data Figure 6 Temporal behaviour of the polarization of CTA 102.

a, The jet optical flux densities. b, The jet polarization fraction Pjet. The horizontal dotted line indicates the average value over the whole period and crosses show the mean values in each observing season. Error bars represent 1 s.d. c, The electric vector polarization angle. The red solid line displays the trend of the viewing angle in the R band (rescaled to fit in the plot; see Fig. 3) and the vertical lines mark the most interesting events, which are discussed in the text.

Extended Data Figure 7 One-zone model fits to the SEDs of CTA 102.

The standard one-zone model40 has been used to fit three SEDs in intermediate-, high- and low-brightness states (see also Fig. 2). Once the physical parameters of the emitting zone are adjusted to reproduce the intermediate-brightness state, the other two model fits are obtained by changing only the Doppler factor to match the optical data. As a result, the millimetre-wavelength flux is largely over- or under-estimated. In all model fits, the thermal component (accretion disk and torus; black line and symbols) was added to the one-zone model synchrotron component.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains the full acknowledgements. (PDF 92 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raiteri, C., Villata, M., Acosta-Pulido, J. et al. Blazar spectral variability as explained by a twisted inhomogeneous jet. Nature 552, 374–377 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing