A ubiquitin-dependent signalling axis specific for ALKBH-mediated DNA dealkylation repair

Published online:


DNA repair is essential to prevent the cytotoxic or mutagenic effects of various types of DNA lesions, which are sensed by distinct pathways to recruit repair factors specific to the damage type. Although biochemical mechanisms for repairing several forms of genomic insults are well understood, the upstream signalling pathways that trigger repair are established for only certain types of damage, such as double-stranded breaks and interstrand crosslinks1,2,3. Understanding the upstream signalling events that mediate recognition and repair of DNA alkylation damage is particularly important, since alkylation chemotherapy is one of the most widely used systemic modalities for cancer treatment and because environmental chemicals may trigger DNA alkylation4,5,6. Here we demonstrate that human cells have a previously unrecognized signalling mechanism for sensing damage induced by alkylation. We find that the alkylation repair complex ASCC (activating signal cointegrator complex)7 relocalizes to distinct nuclear foci specifically upon exposure of cells to alkylating agents. These foci associate with alkylated nucleotides, and coincide spatially with elongating RNA polymerase II and splicing components. Proper recruitment of the repair complex requires recognition of K63-linked polyubiquitin by the CUE (coupling of ubiquitin conjugation to ER degradation) domain of the subunit ASCC2. Loss of this subunit impedes alkylation adduct repair kinetics and increases sensitivity to alkylating agents, but not other forms of DNA damage. We identify RING finger protein 113A (RNF113A) as the E3 ligase responsible for upstream ubiquitin signalling in the ASCC pathway. Cells from patients with X-linked trichothiodystrophy, which harbour a mutation in RNF113A, are defective in ASCC foci formation and are hypersensitive to alkylating agents. Together, our work reveals a previously unrecognized ubiquitin-dependent pathway induced specifically to repair alkylation damage, shedding light on the molecular mechanism of X-linked trichothiodystrophy.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.



  1. 1.

    & Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol. Cell 49, 795–807 (2013)

  2. 2.

    & DNA damage response: three levels of DNA repair regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012724 (2013)

  3. 3.

    , , & Crosstalk between ubiquitin and other post-translational modifications on chromatin during double-strand break repair. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 426–434 (2014)

  4. 4.

    et al. Alkylation damage in DNA and RNA—repair mechanisms and medical significance. DNA Repair 3, 1389–1407 (2004)

  5. 5.

    , & Balancing repair and tolerance of DNA damage caused by alkylating agents. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 104–120 (2012)

  6. 6.

    , , , & Repair of alkylated DNA: recent advances. DNA Repair 6, 429–442 (2007)

  7. 7.

    et al. DNA unwinding by ASCC3 helicase is coupled to ALKBH3-dependent DNA alkylation repair and cancer cell proliferation. Mol. Cell 44, 373–384 (2011)

  8. 8.

    & Understanding and targeting alkylator resistance in glioblastoma. Cancer Discov. 4, 1120–1122 (2014)

  9. 9.

    et al. Novel transcription coactivator complex containing activating signal cointegrator 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 5203–5211 (2002)

  10. 10.

    & The ubiquitin code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 203–229 (2012)

  11. 11.

    et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin recognition by the CUE domain of Vps9p. Cell 113, 609–620 (2003)

  12. 12.

    . et al. Promiscuous interactions of gp78 E3 ligase CUE domain with polyubiquitin chains. Structure 20, 2138–2150 (2012)

  13. 13.

    et al. Human SHPRH is a ubiquitin ligase for Mms2-Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18107–18112 (2006)

  14. 14.

    et al. A critical role for the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc13 in initiating homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 25, 663–675 (2007)

  15. 15.

    et al. Histone H1 couples initiation and amplification of ubiquitin signalling after DNA damage. Nature 527, 389–393 (2015)

  16. 16.

    et al. Dynamic protein-protein interaction wiring of the human spliceosome. Mol. Cell 45, 567–580 (2012)

  17. 17.

    et al. A novel X-linked trichothiodystrophy associated with a nonsense mutation in RNF113A. J. Med. Genet. 52, 269–274 (2015)

  18. 18.

    et al. Identification of C7orf11 (TTDN1) gene mutations and genetic heterogeneity in nonphotosensitive trichothiodystrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 510–516 (2005)

  19. 19.

    , , & Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 138, 389–403 (2009)

  20. 20.

    et al. Noncanonical regulation of alkylation damage resistance by the OTUD4 deubiquitinase. EMBO J. 34, 1687–1703 (2015)

  21. 21.

    , & An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994)

Download references


We thank B. Sleckman, G. Oltz, T. Stappenbeck, S. Virgin, and K. Murphy for their advice on this manuscript. J.R.B. and A.K.B. are supported by a Cell and Molecular Biology Training Grant (5T32GM007067-40), and J.R.B. is also supported by a Shawn Hu and Angela Zeng Student Scholarship. J.M.S. is supported by a Monsanto Graduate Program Fellowship. P.M.L. is supported by a fellowship from the American Cancer Society (PF-14-182-01-DMC). We thank the patients and their families, whose help and participation made this work possible. We acknowledge the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University and Barnes-Jewish Hospital for the use of the GEiC Core. The Siteman Cancer Center is supported by a National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA091842; Eberlein, PI). This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 GM108648 to A.V., R01 GM109102 to C.W., and R01 CA193318 to N.M.), the Alvin Siteman Cancer Research Fund, the Siteman Investment Program (both to N.M.), and the Children’s Discovery Institute of St. Louis Children’s Hospital (MC-II-2015-453 to N.M.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Jennifer M. Soll
    •  & Patrick M. Lombardi

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA

    • Joshua R. Brickner
    • , Jennifer M. Soll
    • , Miranda C. Mudge
    • , Clement Oyeniran
    • , Meagan E. Sullender
    • , Andrea K. Byrum
    • , Yu Zhao
    •  & Nima Mosammaparast
  2. Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA

    • Patrick M. Lombardi
    • , Elyse Blazosky
    •  & Cynthia Wolberger
  3. Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway

    • Cathrine B. Vågbø
    • , Renana Rabe
    •  & Geir Slupphaug
  4. PROMEC Core Facility for Proteomics and Metabolomics, NTNU and the Central Norway Regional Health Authority, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway

    • Cathrine B. Vågbø
    •  & Geir Slupphaug
  5. Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, USA

    • Jessica Jackson
    •  & Alessandro Vindigni
  6. Adelaide Medical School and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia

    • Mark A. Corbett
    •  & Jozef Gécz
  7. Healthy Mothers and Babies, South Australian Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia

    • Jozef Gécz
  8. Genetics of Learning Disability Service, Hunter Genetics, Waratah, New South Wales 2298, Australia

    • Michael Field


  1. Search for Joshua R. Brickner in:

  2. Search for Jennifer M. Soll in:

  3. Search for Patrick M. Lombardi in:

  4. Search for Cathrine B. Vågbø in:

  5. Search for Miranda C. Mudge in:

  6. Search for Clement Oyeniran in:

  7. Search for Renana Rabe in:

  8. Search for Jessica Jackson in:

  9. Search for Meagan E. Sullender in:

  10. Search for Elyse Blazosky in:

  11. Search for Andrea K. Byrum in:

  12. Search for Yu Zhao in:

  13. Search for Mark A. Corbett in:

  14. Search for Jozef Gécz in:

  15. Search for Michael Field in:

  16. Search for Alessandro Vindigni in:

  17. Search for Geir Slupphaug in:

  18. Search for Cynthia Wolberger in:

  19. Search for Nima Mosammaparast in:


J.R.B., J.M.S., C.O., M.E.S. and N.M. performed cellular and biochemical experiments. P.M.L. performed isothermal titration calorimetry experiments. C.B.V. and R.R. performed alkylated lesion quantification. M.C.M., A.K.B. and Y.Z. assisted with providing reagents and technical help. P.M.L. and E.B. performed the structural analysis. M.A.C., J.G. and M.F. provided X-TTD patient cells. J.J. performed DNA fibre analysis and was supervised by A.V. C.W. supervised P.M.L. and E.B. G.S. supervised C.B.V. and R.R. N.M. supervised the project and wrote the manuscript with J.R.B., with input from all other authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Mosammaparast.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Life Sciences Reporting Summary

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Figure 1

    This file contains uncropped western blots and gels used in this study. Black rectangles denote how the blots and gels were cropped for final figures.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Table 4

    All antibodies used in this study with concentrations noted. The antibodies were produced in either rabbit or mouse. Applications include Western blot (WB), immunofluorescence microscopy (IF), flow cytometry (FC) and proximity ligation assay (PLA).

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

    Mass spectrometry data for TAP-ASCC2 purified from HeLa-S cells with or without prior exposure to MMS.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Table 2

    A comprehensive list of each shRNA, including TRC numbers, used in the focused shRNA screen to identify the relevant E3 ligase.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Table 3

    Mass spectrometry data for TAP-ASCC2 WT or the TAP-ASCC2 L506A CUE mutant purified from HeLa-S cells after MMS treatment.